Hiring A Historical Figure Psychology Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Hiring A Historical Figure Psychology Essay
The Penn State psychology department is hiring a historical figure! Select one historical figure from the field and create a brief historical resume for them based on their actual life events. Below is a list of some potential candidates to consider for the project. If you wish to use someone not on this list, please make sure you have your instructor’s approval before you start.
Potential Historical Figures to Consider for the Assignment
Erik Erikson
Joyce Brothers
Leon Festinger
Maria Montessori
Carl Jung
Lawrence Kohlberg
Stanley Milgram
Helen T. Woolley
Ivan Pavlov
Burrhus F. Skinner
Edward Thorndike
Reiko True
John Watson
David Wechsler
Wilhelm Wundt
Edward Titchener
Francis Galton
Diana Baumrind
William James
Uri Bronfenbrenner
Francis Cecil Sumner
Mary W. Calkins
Karen Horney
John Bowlby
Margaret F. Washburn
Mary Ainsworth
James Cattell
Diane Fossey
Edward Tolman
Clark L. Hull
Muriel Lezak
Max Wertheimer
Eleanor J. Gibson
Alfred Binet
Carol Gilligan
Noam Chomsky
Herman von Helmholtz
Gustav Fechner
Abraham Maslow
Olivia Hooker
Gordon Allport
Inez Beverly Prosser
Pierre Flourens
Ruth Winifred Howard
Franz Gall
Mamie Phipps Clark
Aaron Beck
Alberta Banner Turner
John Dewey
Anna Freud
Brenda Milner
William Stern
Melanie Klein
Hugo Munsterberg
Florence Denmark
Leta Stetter Hollingworth
Jean Piaget
Mary Cover Jones
Herman George Canaday
Instructions
The resume should include the following elements:
Brief Personal Information/History: This should include their name, major city & country of origin, birth date, and a picture of the individual. Additionally, this section should have a short paragraph outlining a little about the individuals personal history. This section could reflect their family life or possibly certain challenges or tragedies they may have overcome. You should also consider including a “special notes” section where you could mention something particularly unusual yet fascinating that you learned about the individual. Note, this doesn’t have to relate directly to psychology, but could be something related to their personal life. This special note doesn’t need to be more than a couple sentences but can be longer if desired.
Objective: A quick statement or two of the type of positions the historical figure might be seeking along with the major focus area of that position.
Educational Background: school names, years attended, degrees earned, and areas of interest and/or study. Do your best to dig up as much of this information you can through various resources.
Employment history: An outline of their major work/job experience(s). Again, do your best to dig up as much information here through multiple resources.
Accomplishments and Awards: Any awards or honors that they received for certain achievements that you can find. This can also include significant life events, which shaped their perspective on psychology and/or the history of the field.
Primary Areas of Interest and Study: Here you should start by listing the area of psychology that is most associated with your historical figure (e.g. developmental, physiological, cognitive, etc.). Then, provide a couple of examples of specific areas and/or ideas that the individual contributed to this area. Finally, also include a list of any other areas of interest/study associated with your historical figure – both related to and outside of the field of psychology.
Major Publications (References): Provide a list of major publications that are associated with your historical figure. Think of those papers, books, talks or book chapters they may be proudest to display on a resume.
Summary of One Piece of Work: Then, provide a description of one of those references to demonstrate you understand the content of that reference. Here, try to get ahold of the original source (if possible) rather than relying on secondary sources/descriptions.
Resume Project Sources: Finally, provide a reference list of the resources you used to complete the project. It would be expected that you would have to enlist the help of at least 3-5 resources to have a comprehensive project. Please avoid using resources (such as Wikipedia or About.com) which may be questionable on content accuracy. Acceptable resources tend to be peer reviewed such as book or book chapters written by someone with a degree in psychology, published articles (e.g. via PsycINFO) or websites written by reputable organizations (e.g. APA) related to psychology.
Quick Note: There is an example resume on CANVAS (Granville Stanley Hall), which can provide you with a basis on how to go about constructing your own historical resume. While the resume should be as comprehensive as possible and involve multiple sources, the total length of the project should not exceed 3 pages. If you have questions, please let us know!
Hiring A Historical Figure Psychology Essay
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!