Health and Medical Question Essay Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Health and Medical Question Essay Assignment
Hi,
Please read and contribute to peer discussion in 100 words with at least 2-3 credible references in APA style.
Peer 1
Strong, robust systems for capturing health program data are essential to tracking progress toward health objectives, such as the Millennium Development Goals, and will be central to supporting data-informed decisions as part of the new Sustainable Development Goals. The data quality assessment tools were originally developed as part of global efforts to combat AIDS, malaria, and tuberculosis.
Ambitious plans for national programs and donor-funded projects were in the works to reduce the burden of disease in countries around the world. Measuring the success and improving the management of these initiatives is predicated on strong monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems that produce good-quality data related to program implementation. In the spirit of the “Three Ones,” the “Stop TB Strategy,” and the “Roll Back Malaria Global Strategic Plan,” a number of multilateral and bilateral organizations collaborated to develop the Data Quality Audit (DQA) Tool.
This tool captures high-priority indicators from HIV and AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria programs and offers a common approach to assessing and improving overall data quality. Having a single tool helps to ensure that standards are harmonized and allows for joint implementation by partners and national programs. Implementing the DQA tool revealed the need for a capacity-building and self-assessment version.
To that end, MEASURE Evaluation (funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development), the World Health Organization, the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria worked together to develop the Routine Data Quality Assessment (RDQA) Tool. We designed it to build the capacity of health programs to assess and improve the quality of their data.
The tool has subsequently been applied many times—both by individual health programs and by country health management information systems (HMIS). The RDQA tool verifies the quality of reported data and assesses the underlying data management and reporting systems for standard program-level output indicators.
Purpose: Performance standards for birth defects surveillance are intended to improve and standardize operations, outcomes, and surveillance functions across state programs, thereby making data more consistent and useful for a variety of purposes at local, state, multi-state, and national levels.
Format: This assessment tool lists performance indicators and associated measurements for data quality. Each line item measurement identifies the level of standards performance. Performance indicators are organized into completeness, timeliness, and accuracy categories.
Definition-explanations: Each performance indicator is followed by the definition that provided clarification of how to interpret the indicator and the reason/explanation for the specific performance indicator. (Data Quality Assessment Tool, n.d.)
Data quality assessment tool for birth defects surveillance:
Check the highest Performance level that applies.. Level1 – Unable to achieve Level3 – Achieved
Completeness Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Types of data sources are used systemically and routinely to identify potential cases at the population-based level. Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Birth defects included using standard definitions Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Pregnancy outcomes included Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Systematic and routine identification of cases during ascertainment period (age of diagnosis) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Data elements collected Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Timeliness Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Time of case data completion for “core” list Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Time of case data completion for “recommended” list Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Accuracy Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Data quality procedures for verification of case diagnosis Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Scope of birth defects verified Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level of expertise for individuals who perform case diagnosis verification Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Database quality assurance process Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 References
Data Quality Assessment Tool. (n.d.). National Birth Defects Prevention Network. Retrieved February 3, 2022, from https://www.nbdpn.org/docs/BD_data_quality_assessment_tool_2015_2016DEC14.pdf
Routine Data Quality Assessment Tool – User Manual — MEASURE Evaluation. (n.d.). MEASURE Evaluation. Retrieved February 3, 2022, from https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/ms-17-117.html
Peer 2
The paper-based medical record has been largely being replaced in most United States (U.S.) healthcare facilities with the Electronic Health Record (EHR). The EHR is like a paper one, except all the information gets stored electronically. The EHR has the same components necessary for the patient’s information. The components are and are not limited to name, date of birth, gender, marital status, demographics address. Additional components included insurance information, vital signs, diagnoses, medical history, immunization dates, progress notes, lab data, imaging reports, and allergies. The purpose of EHR is to ensure that the patients receive the best quality of care. In the U.S. if a person has been seen by a healthcare provider a medical record will and has been created and all this information is called data (Digital Health, 2020) Data is formulated by multiple providers along the patient’s care continuum all data must have integrity, be reliable and be accurate.
The Health Information Management (HIM) staff ensures that all data in the EHR is reliable and accurate. The American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA along with the AHIMA Governance Principles for Healthcare (IGPHC) enacted key principles for data information (AHIMA, 2015).
The measures of data quality are Accountability, Transparency Integrity, Protection, Compliance, Availability, Retention, and Disposition. Oachs & Watters,( 2020) “ healthcare delivery systems are increasingly using quality metrics to benchmark and assess the quality of care, and inform improvement initiatives”. In conclusion, the best practice for the HIM department to achieve “data goals” of integrity, reliability, and accuracy is the have a Data Quality Tool Kit (DQTK) for EHR as indicated below.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!