groupthink assignment
Order ID | 53563633773 |
Type | Essay |
Writer Level | Masters |
Style | APA |
Sources/References | 4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order | 5-10 Pages |
A minimum of 100 words each and ReferencesResponse (#1–6) KEEP RESPONSE WITH ANSWER
Make sure the responses include (a) a thorough comprehension of the weekly material, as evidenced by a scholarly resource, and (b) a probing question. (c) stick to the theme
This whole groupthink phenomenon reminds me of a group of kids who want to play a game; each child has their own game in mind, but the game that is usually chosen is by the bunch’s most dominating member. My employer once told me that this was how she chose the group’s leaders. My prior supervisor would make proposals and, of course, no one would answer, so she would pick a team leader based on who opted to respond to her ideas. I don’t believe this is a fair method, but I always say, “If you snooze, you lose.” What I mean is that if you miss your turn to get up and say something, you lose that opportunity and time runs out. Where else have you witnessed groupthink at its finest?
The concept of making decisions based on what is best for the group as a whole rather than what is best for oneself is known as group mentality. Although group think has the potential to limit members’ ideas, it is frequently used subconsciously to minimize group conflict, increase cohesion, and speed up decision-making. Trying to determine where to lunch with friends is an example of groupthink. You desire sushi, but don’t mention it; instead, recommend a restaurant that you know everyone will appreciate to avoid wasting time debating about where to dine. Peer pressure, complacency, and self-censorship are all important variables that contribute to group thought. One strategy to eliminate group thought is to be dissatisfied with the group’s beliefs if they don’t match your own ideals. Another strategy to avoid groupthink is to resist peer pressure and express your views honestly.
There are se
The Kennedy administration’s decision to dump a group of CIA-trained Cuban refugees on the beaches of Cuba’s Bay of Pigs without providing air cover to foster the overthrow of Fidel Castro’s regime, and the Johnson administration’s decision to increase the number of American soldiers in Vietnam are just a few examples provided in our book (Gilovich, Keltner, Chen, & Nisbett, 2019). Groupthink influences group decisions because members are more concerned with social pressures to reach an agreement than with the issues at hand (Gilovich, et al., 2019). Shallow analysis of facts, limiting assessment of options, a sense of moral superiority, and self-censorship are all thought to contribute to group think (Gilovich, et al., 2019). This is especially true if there is a strong leader in the group; people may be less willing to speak up or offer their ideas. To combat groupthink, I believe that open communication should always be promoted, and that everyone should feel free to voice their thoughts and opinions. If there is a strong leader, they could hold off on expressing their ideas or preferences at the start of the discussion so that people don’t conform to the idea without sharing their own, or they could even withdraw from the discussion at times to give people the freedom to talk about whatever they want (Gilovich, et al., 2019). Outside sources and professional viewpoints should always be welcomed, flaws should always be identified, and the plan should always be thoroughly examined.
After some deliberation, I’ve come to the following conclusion. I don’t consider myself to be a member of such a group. I belong to a dancing club group for my daughter’s dance class, as well as family and work-at-home clubs. As primary and secondary groups, which turn out to be necessary and optional gatherings. In these conditions, I have by and large felt deindividuation and experienced it when I was another worker with my new job at home, and I went along with what the group needed to accomplish since I lacked sufficient self-assurance and inspiration to make a decision. When working on a family project, there have been times when less and inconsistent effort has been put into assignments when working as a group as opposed to working alone. In the workplace, I have generally seen social support where a program might be implemented, and I have found that working in groups is more profitable than working alone.
I struggled a little with this question since I am a very private person who does not consider herself to be a member of any group other than my family. Any groups in which I participate appear to be quite brief. For example, I imagine I was among a group of football parents when my son was playing football. Because I work seasonally, I consider the other servers and I to be a group when I’m on the job. Apart from that, I don’t consider myself to be a member of any group. I can relate to social facilitation the best out of the three terms deindividuation, social loafing, and social facilitation. Although I am certain that I have experienced deindividuation, I am unable to recall any specific occurrences. I can think of situations where I’ve tried to help my fiancé and his friends move something heavy and noticed that I’m not doing nearly as much work as I would if I were doing it alone, which is the closest thing I can think of to social loafing, which is exerting less effort on a group task when individual contributions can’t be measured (Gilovich, Keltner, Chen, & Nisbett, 2019). If my assistance is ineffective or unnecessary, I usually go on to another work. However, I can recall countless instances of social facilitation from my own life. For example, I used to compete in track and field, and the arousal generated by the presence of others aided my performance significantly. As a result, when I’ve tried to study something new, such as the piano, I’ve found that I perform far better when I’m alone than when someone is listening.
I am a member of a number of organizations. Parent of a youth wrestler and youth football player, firefighter, paramedic, and student in a Jiu Jitsu club. Social loafing, deindividualization, and social facilitation are all prevalent in the fire service. During group drills on the fire field or cleaning the station, social loafing is common. When the rest of the crew is being monitored, that individual will not put out as much effort or work as hard. When new guys/girls join the service, deindividualization develops. They are taught that their opinions don’t matter and that they should learn how the agency works. Although I disagree with this, it appears to be the industry standard. As a result, we lock down the individual, preventing them from learning from them or feeling open and free to speak and educate. When I’ve been on a stressful call and another medic arrives, he or she makes the situation worse by becoming wound up and “spazzy.” When I’m alone or with another calm medic, it ends up distracting me more.