goal of intensifying a romantic relationship
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
goal of intensifying a romantic relationship
Week 2: Concept Activity (10 pts)
Objective: in this concept activity you will practice using APA format. You will (a) practice identifying improperly formatted information from a scholarly research report and (b) create a reference sheet.
Directions: Download the .doc titled ‘Week_2_Concept_Activity.’ Follow the directions provided to complete the activity. When you are finished, upload your completed concept activity as a .doc to the assignment link on Blackboard. You will complete this week’s concept activity in two steps. In step 1, you will identify whether or not a re-written paragraph is plagiarized or not based on the in-text citations provided in the paragraph. In step 2, you will read through a list of citations provided in a references sheet and identify if there is anything wrong with the citation and how you would fix it. Make sure to use the text, lecture information, and APA formatting handouts provided to help identify the proper format for in-text citations (Referencing in-text citations_guide) and references list (References_list_citations_guide).
- Below is an original paragraph from a research report (research article). Read through the paragraph. Following this paragraph are examples of re-written paragraphs that use this information. Read each one and identify (a) if it is plagiarized or if it is properly cited, (b) if it is plagiarized what makes it plagiarized, and (c) what, if any, corrections would you make to fix the paragraph so it is not plagiarized. (10 pts)
- Below is a list of citations from a references list. Read through the list and identify whether or not each citation adheres to APA format. If it does not, explain what you would do to correct it (10 pts).
Due: January 20th (11:59 PM)
Step 1 (5 points)
This is an original paragraph from a research report (research article). Read through the paragraph. After this paragraph are re-written paragraphs that cite this information. Read each one and identify (a) if it is plagiarized or if it is properly cited, (b) if it is plagiarized what makes it plagiarized, and (c) what, if any, corrections would you make to fix the paragraph so it is not plagiarized.
From: Kunkel, Wilson, Robson, & Olufowote, 2004, p. 27
“The goal of intensifying a romantic relationship is associated with the potential threat of appearing overly dependent more so than starting or ending such relationships. Individuals attempting to further solidify the commitment of a relational partner are vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner.”
Example #1: The goal of intensifying a romantic relationship is associated with the potential threat of appearing overly dependent more so than starting or ending such relationships. Individuals attempting to further solidify the commitment of a relational partner are vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner.
Example #2: The goal of intensifying a romantic relationship is associated with the potential threat of appearing overly dependent more so than starting or ending such relationships. Individuals attempting to further solidify the commitment of a relational partner are vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner (Kunkel, Wilson, Robson, & Olufowote, 2004).
Example #3: When individuals want to intensify a romantic relationship, there is a potential threat of appearing over dependent. In attempting to solidify the commitment of a relational partner, they may be vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner.
Example #4: “The goal of intensifying a romantic relationship is associated with the potential threat of appearing overly dependent more so than starting or ending such relationships. Individuals attempting to further solidify the commitment of a relational partner are vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner” (Kunkel, Wilson, Robson, & Olufowote, 2004, p.27).
Example #5: When individuals want to intensify a romantic relationship, there is a potential threat of appearing over dependent. In attempting to solidify the commitment of a relational partner, they may be vulnerable to looking as though they are “needy,” “clingy,” or too attached to their partner (Kunkel, Wilson, Robson, & Olufowote, 2004).
Example #6: When individuals want to make a romantic relationship more intense, being overly dependent is a potential threat. In trying to solidify the commitment of another person, they may seem vulnerable to looking as though they are too attached to their partner (Kunkel, Wilson, Robson, & Olufowote, 2004).
Example #8: When individuals want to make a romantic relationship more intense, being overly dependent is a potential threat. In trying to solidify the commitment of another person, they may seem vulnerable to looking as though they are too attached to their partner.
Step 2 (5 points)
The following citations were taken from the references list of a literature review. Read through each citation and identify (a) if the reference is properly cited according to APA format and (b) if it is not properly cited, provide the correct citation for the reference below (10 pts).
References
Brown, Big Bad. (1995). Sick opossums. Los Angeles: Animal Press.
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Carlson, U. H. (1999). Marsupial woes. Retrieved from http://www.animalkinds/marsupials.com
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Denver, C. O. (2001). A case study involving a possum with a low socioeconomic status and multiple siblings. Journal of Low Socioeconomic Status and Number of Siblings, 1, 13-15. doi: 10.738/688902865
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Johnson, A. J. (1999). One Hundred And One Roadkill Recipes. Retrieved August 12, 2003, from http://www.rednecksforever.com
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Mars, U. P. (2002). Why they call it playing possum possibly plays on the play of possums. Journal of the Improvement for all Pouched Mammals, 3. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3738-2
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Red, E. E., & Iam, O. K. (1990). Roadkill and other societal ills. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 145, 253-259. doi:10.1407/11299-035-3739
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Show, M. E. Possum personality. Los Angeles: Animal Press.
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Thompson, A. B. (1988). Borderline personality disorders in marsupials. Journal of Zookeepers, 101-114. Doi: 10.1177/000276486029005003
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
Zany, M. O., and Steele, R. E. (1976). Why they run into the highway. Journal of Animal Disorders, 34, 23-67. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199
Correct citation? (Yes/No):
If no, state what it needs to be correct (i.e., what is missing):
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!