FIN 4303 Commercial Bank Project Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
FIN 4303 Commercial Bank Project Assignment
FIN 4303 – Commercial Banking Assignment – Part 1
Return on equity equals the product of the equity multiplier and return on assets. It measures the
net income produced for each dollar of equity capital. The equity multiplier reflects the amount of leverage the bank uses to finance its assets. As the equity multiplier increases, the firm’s solvency risk increases. Return on assets measures net income produced for each dollar of total assets. Return on assets is the product of asset turnover and profit margin. Profit margin represents the firm’s ability to control expenses. Asset turnover measures the ability to produce net income from assets. These ratios are most useful when used as relative valuations against other firms in the commercial banking industry or over time1.
1 Saunders, Anthony. Financial Markets and Institutions
Return on Assets .5%
Asset Turnover 3%
Equity Multiplier 12.1 times
Return on Equity 6.3%
Profit Margin 17.3%
2
Figure 1: JPMorgan Chase & Co. 15
Figure 2: Industry 15
Figure 3:
Ratio Analysis 15
15 http://www.fdic.gov
3
Interpreting the Trends
From 2000 to 2001, JPMorgan Chase & Co.’s (JPM) ROE decreased resulting from a decline in net income, and thus profit margin. The recession had a large impact on JPM in 2001. Net income dropped due to unfavorable spreads, reductions in asset values, and less liquidity in equity markets2. Losses on private equity investments and lower investment banking fees caused revenues to decline3. The investment banking segment’s operating revenue shrank in reaction to reduced demand for M&A and equity underwriting in the market4. The firm also incurred higher non-interest expenses, namely merger and restructuring costs, related to the JP Morgan and Chase merger. JPM recognized higher than expected charge-offs in consumer and loan portfolios, forcing them to increase their provisions for loan losses5.
Over the next years, from 2002 to 2003, JPM was able to significantly increase its profit margin as a result of a 64% decrease in the provisions for loan losses that had been increased the previous year. This decrease reflects improvement in JPM’s previously troubled commercial loan portfolio, as well as a higher volume of credit card securitizations. The higher profit margin caused ROE to increase from 1.6% to 11.5%, and also resulted in an increased ROA. JPM’s total assets declined relative to equity, and they had to turn to outside, more costly debt financing due to reduced demand for their loans; these actions were at the root of the decreasing equity multiplier6.
From 2003 to 2004, JPM’s previously inflated ROE decreased from 11.5% to 2.9% as a result of a large increase in equity capital, primarily the result of JPM’s merger with Bank One. Also as a result of this merger, noninterest expenses increased from $19 trillion to $30 trillion. Although this 8.6% decrease in ROE is large, it merely offsets the prior increase of 9.9%, and in fact the 2.9% ROE remains higher than the 1.6% that was recorded at the beginning of 2002. JPM’s lower net income in 2004 can be attributed to merger costs, charges to conform to accounting policies as a result of the merger, and a charge to increase litigation reserves. Lower net income in this period led to a lower ROE, ROA, and profit margin. According to the annual report, had JPM not incurred these charges, ROE would have been 11% 7. Further eroding potential earning was an increase in competitive pressures which forced prices down for loan models8.
ROE significantly increased from 2004 to 2005. Due to healthy growth in the economy, net income increased and resulted in higher profit margins and ROA than the previous year. During this time, short term interest rates continued to rise and capital and equity markets remained strong9. The equity markets remained strong in 2006, and JPM’s margins and returns held steady. This would later be recognized as the calm before the storm.
In 2007, the mortgage crisis weakened the credit market10, and ultimately caused many troubled wholesale and consumer loans. JPM had not planned for this to happen and was forced to once again increase provisions for loan losses. JPM’s acquisition of Washington Mutual and Bear Stearns resulted in
2 2001 Annual Report, pg. 24 3 2002 Annual Report, pg. 69 4 2001 Annual Report, pg. 30 5 2002 Annual Report, pg. 69 6 2003 Annual Report, pg. 24 7 2004 Annual Report, pg. 20 8 “Report on the condition of the U.S. banking industry: 4th Quarter, 2004.” Federal Reserve Reports FRY-9C and FR Y-9LP. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Report+on+the+condition+of+the+U.S.+banking+industry:+fourth+quarter,-a0134672382. 9 2005 Annual Report, pg. 25 10 2008 Annual Report, pg. 35
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!