Factors to Consider in the Preparation of Proposal Budgets
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Factors to Consider in the Preparation of Proposal Budgets
Author Note
I have no known conflict of interest to disclose.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to
2
MEASURING SUCCESS 2
Costs of Proposal/Service
Introduction
The budget of any proposal, including the costs of materials, resources, and the time frame of the project must be prepared in an accurate, appealing, and justifiable way to help the organization realize profitability. The preparation of a proposal budget requires one to consider five key factors including research and development, salaries, travel costs, the profit margin, and operational costs.
Factors to Consider in the Preparation of Proposal Budgets
The effective estimation of costs on a proposal budget requires the consideration of commitment and efforts among the stakeholders including employers and employees, estimating methods, cost sharing, and allowability. For example, in relation to a principal investigator proposing budgets for Stanford University, it is the responsibility for the PI to assure Stanford University, and the potential sponsors that the finances of the projects are represented in an accurate way. Moreover, the federal government must define certain prerequisites, such as the cost principles under §200 of the Uniform Guidance. Furthermore, the PI must ensure that the budget proposal is consistent to the requirements imposed by the CAS (federal Cost Accounting Standards) board; must be observed and at the proposal phase, in addition to where the funds will be used.
Salary Costs
The process of preparation of proposal budgets involves the need for an individual to calculate the salary costs for the proposals. Determining costs also requires one to determine the participants of the projects and how these people will be compensated for their efforts. For instance, an advertising agency could support their clients with media buyers, copy writers, account executives, art directors, and creative directors (Shim et al., 2011). In contrast, a software firm could depend on an implementation specialist, a support representative, and a customer success representative. Upon identifying the people who will support the project’s prospect if they decide to work with the organization, it will be necessary to determine the amount of money they will make in an hour (Shim et al., 2011). On the other hand, calculating the salary costs will require one to multiply the amount of money they make per hour with the number of hours needed to complete the project.
Research and Development Costs
Alongside estimating salary costs, it is crucial to consider the costs of research and development when preparing budget. When preparing budgets, it is important for the budget planners to determine whether the firm had a viable market and offering (Shim et al., 2011). For instance, Apple Inc. invest heavily in research and development to help its marketing to understand, market trends, the changing preferences of customers in relation to changing technologies, as well as what their competitors are offering in the tech industry. In determining Apple’s research and development costs, the marketers had to determine the amount of capital the firm spent creating the products and other offerings in its portfolio. As such, Apple Inc. recognizes that, although the firm would not put the burden to recoup the R&D costs on a single market segment/ customer base, it is important to consider these costs as they help the company realize profitability.
Travel Costs
Travel costs are also an important factor to consider, especially if the employees must travel. For example, when a company wants to have its products reach emerging markets, it would require that the firm sends some employees-marketers, to assess the potential for profits in that market (Mauskopf et al., 2015). In other words, if personnel must travel to satisfy the needs and outcomes of the proposal, it would require budget planners to calculate and estimate travel costs. For instance, when Samsung wanted to expand its customer base in emerging markets across Africa, the executives had the responsibility of not only identifying the trainers, salespeople, account managers, and implementation specialists, but also estimate and allocate travel costs for these delegates’ on-site visits to target clients (Mauskopf et al., 2015). Therefore, to estimate travel costs, an individual must multiply the number of travelers, with the costs of return tickets to their destinations.
Operational Costs
Another cost to consider in preparing budget proposal is operational expenses. Operational costs include expenses like utilities, general staff, rent, marketing, maintenance, and sales expenses. which organizations must incur to continue its business operations (Buckley, 2017). The process of estimating operating costs of a proposal or service also requires the budget planners to outline the aspect of cost sharing. For instance, in a university setting, when a principal investigator proposes a specific project, the University usually agrees to cost share University resources. According to Buckley (2017), to ensure effective utilization of resources and reducing operational costs, the University is obligated to provide the stated resources in the performance of the project. Furthermore, based on the administrative responsibilities and requirements that are integral within the cost sharing efforts, the PI must weigh the cost effectiveness versus the expected benefit of each cost.
Conclusion
The preparation of a proposal budget requires planners to consider various factors, including travel costs, salary costs, operational costs, and research and development costs. Effective implementation of projects requires the optimal utilization of resources, materials, and time, aimed at reducing operational costs.
References
Buckley, S. (2017). Preparing the budget. Making an Effective Bid: A Practical Guide for Research, Teaching and Consultancy, 73.
Mauskopf, J. A., Earnshaw, S., & Mullins, C. D. (2015). Budget impact analysis: review of the state of the art. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research, 5(1), 65-79.
Shim, J. K., Siegel, J. G., & Shim, A. I. (2011). Budgeting basics and beyond (Vol. 574). John Wiley & Sons.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!