Exploring the Asteroid Belt 

Exploring the Asteroid Belt

Description/Paper Instructions

Exploring the Asteroid Belt

The asteroid belt is a region between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter that contains thousands of asteroids, ranging in size from small boulders to massive rocks several hundred kilometers across. For many years, scientists have been fascinated by the asteroids in this region and have sent a number of spacecraft to study them.

One of the key goals of exploring the asteroid belt is to better understand the formation and evolution of our solar system. Asteroids are thought to be remnants from the early solar system, and studying them can help us learn more about the conditions that existed when the planets were forming. By analyzing the composition and structure of asteroids, scientists can gain insights into the processes that shaped the solar system.

Another reason to explore the asteroid belt is to search for resources that could be used for future space missions. Some asteroids contain valuable minerals, such as iron, nickel, and platinum, that could be used to construct spacecraft or space habitats. Additionally, some asteroids contain water, which could be used to sustain human life in space or to create rocket fuel.

One of the most famous missions to explore the asteroid belt was NASA’s Dawn mission, which launched in 2007 and orbited two asteroids, Vesta and Ceres. Vesta is one of the largest asteroids in the belt, and Dawn spent over a year studying the asteroid’s surface, composition, and geology. Ceres, on the other hand, is the largest object in the asteroid belt and is classified as a dwarf planet. Dawn orbited Ceres for several years, studying its surface features and confirming the presence of water ice.

Another mission to explore the asteroid belt is the Japanese Hayabusa2 mission, which launched in 2014 and returned to Earth in 2020. Hayabusa2 landed on the asteroid Ryugu in 2018 and collected samples from its surface, which were then returned to Earth for analysis. These samples are expected to provide valuable insights into the composition and evolution of asteroids in the solar system.

Future missions to explore the asteroid belt are already in the works. NASA is planning to launch the Psyche mission in 2022, which will study a metal-rich asteroid known as 16 Psyche. This asteroid is thought to be the exposed core of a protoplanet that never fully formed, and studying it could provide insights into the early history of the solar system.

Another mission in development is the European Space Agency’s Hera mission, which is planned for launch in 2024. Hera will visit the asteroid Didymos, which is actually a binary asteroid system consisting of two objects orbiting each other. Hera will study the asteroid’s composition and structure and will also test technologies for deflecting asteroids that could potentially pose a threat to Earth.

In conclusion, exploring the asteroid belt is a fascinating and important area of space exploration. By studying asteroids and their composition, scientists can gain valuable insights into the formation and evolution of our solar system. Additionally, the search for resources on asteroids could provide new opportunities for future space missions. With new missions already in the works, the asteroid belt is sure to continue to be a focus of scientific research and exploration for many years to come.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Exploring the Asteroid Belt

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!