Evaluating Time-Lapse of China’s Construction Miracle
Evaluating, Time, Lapse, China’s, Construction, Miracle
A “project charter” is an official, characteristically document which are brief that outlines the scheme in its wholeness. It includes what the goals and objectives are, the way it is going to be undertaken, and who the shareholders are. It is a vital ingredient in the preparation of the scheme since it is employed in the entire lifecycle of the project.
This charter is focusing on the time-lapse of China’s construction miracle as a result of constructing a 15-store building hotel in less than 6 days.
Project Title:
The title of the project is called Changsha Ark Hotel and was 15 stories building. This project was projected to take less than 6 days and that is exactly what happened. The sponsor for this project was China’s Broad Group.
Business Need:
The key need for constructing these 15 stories building in less than 6 days was that China’s Broad Group desired to demonstrate the efficiency and speed of its novel technology when it comes to construction, hence in a record period, they constructed the “Ark Hotel in Changsha”.
Deliverables
The deliverable was to make sure that this project of 15 stories has been completed on time stipulated. Through this, the project sponsors desire was met which was to showcase the efficiency and speed when it comes to technological advancement in the field of constructions.
Risks and issues.
The risk associated with this construction was that it could not be in a position to withstand an earthquake which could be beyond a 9.0 magnitude. Another issue what that the building was not meant to serve for a long period since it was constructed through the use of prefabricated parts. Also, the time frame was challenging if they could have decided to construct material on-site and assemble them. Instead, they opted to manufacture the materials off-site which possibly took weeks to produce them completely.
Assumptions/Dependencies.
The assumption on this project was that for them to complete within the 6 days a record time, everything will be available on-site on time since the materials were fabricated of the site.
Financials.
Even though the total cost was not disclosed, the “Ark Hotel” was constructed on one-sixth the material for the construction of an equivalent sized construction with a 20% cost saving.
Milestone Schedule.
Using a group of 200 workforces the physical outline was erected in only 46.5 hours and the exterior covering and interior non- physical surfaces were finished in another 90 hours. In a total of fewer than 6 days, a 15 stories building was complete and that was the time-lapse of China’s construction miracle.
Reference
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE
NO RESPONSE
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY
SATISFACTORY
GOOD
EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever.
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!