ET310 Week 2 Nodal and Mesh Analysis Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ET310 Week 2 Nodal and Mesh Analysis Discussion
Complete Discussion and reply to the peer posts below
Nodal and Mesh Analysis and Thevenin Equivalents
Please answer BOTH of the questions.
o Discuss a general approach for applying nodal and mesh analysis.
o Discuss how the determination of the Thevenin Equivalent circuit simplifies the design of complex circuits
o Reply to both peer posts below. Comments should discuss the topic, simple confirmation is not acceptable. Therefore, add some technical aspects of the topic in the comment on others.
Nasrudeen Ismail
This week discussion topic talked about the definition of the Node Voltage and mesh Current method, which is used to solve Linea problems, I found that the Node Voltage method and the Mesh current method are very useful for solving electronic circuit problems. First, you need to collect the information require to solve the problem, such as using the node voltage by applying kcl at each unknown node in the circuit and look for any supper node then sum the current flowing the node voltage uning these two method kcl and kvl to set the equation to zero and sum the current then put them in matrix format which I found to be difficult in the beginning but after I practice a view examples and used the octove online plateform to solve the matrix which maded easy for me to understand how the two method work and when you should apply them more lucky when we have more than three nodes and three meshes in the circuit we solve the node voltage we define one node to be zero volt then sum the equation. By finding the mesh loop that make up the circuit then we circulate each mesh current around the loops or the current then we will label the voltage drops on each component and we write the KVL equation around each mesh to Convert voltage equations to mesh-current equations using Ohm’s law.
Thevenin theorem is an analytical method used to break down a complex circuit into a simple circuit which state that any liner circuit contains multiple resistors and voltage can be changed by single resistor in series connected to load and it is not impossible to simplify any electronic circuit to an equivalent two terminal circuit.
https://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/dccircuits/dcp_7.html
o
Jason Coon
For nodal analysis, it is best to make the circuit as simple as possible, with no crossing wires. Next is to find essential nodes, which are nodes with 3 or more components connected to it. One essential node can be made the reference, and can be ignored, the reference node will most often be of ground, with 0 volts. Once nodes are defined, KCL will be used to solve for voltages by putting the equations into a matrix. Supernodes are best done if nodes contain a source between them.
For mesh, follow the first step of nodal by making the circuit as simple as possible. The next step will be making mesh loops. Then KVL can be done to find the currents. These KVL equations can be put into a matrix and then solved. A supermesh is best done if two meshes share a power source.
By knowing the Thevenin equivalent, a complex circuit can be simplified down to a single component and a power source. This would make designing additions onto the circuit much easier, and would not need complex calculations to see how the circuit would react
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!