ENG 112 090N – Organization Analysis Paper
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
ENG 112 090N – Organization Analysis Paper
ENG 112 090N – Organization Analysis Paper
Due Date: March 28, 2018 Points Worth: 15 Page Requirement: 4-6
Organization Analysis Paper
You will write a 4-6 page paper analyzing the organization of an article surrounding a current event found online. The topic is open ended, but must be classroom appropriate. Following the Checklist found in From Critical Thinking to Argument on page 228, you will examine how the article handles the topic, makes claims, offers support, organizes the information, and communicates everything to the reader in their attempt to be successful. At least 3-5 quotes are required to be cited in this paper in order to help you fully explain your analysis. Use the checklist on page 191 to check your own paper’s elements as well. See schedule for due dates.
Paper Format
All papers should be double-spaced, in 12 point, Times New Roman font, with one inch margins. Always document sources throughout your paper carefully and accurately. Use MLA guidelines to document your sources (See Rules for Writers or the Purdue OWL link on Blackboard).
Things to Consider:
A Checklist for Organizing an Argument (228)
- Does the introduction let the readers know where the author is taking them?
- Does the introduction state the problem or issue?
- Does it state the claim (the thesis)?
- Does it suggest the organization of the essay, thereby helping the reader to follow the argument?
- Do subsequent paragraphs support the claim?
- Do they offer evidence?
- Do they face objections to the claim and offer reasonable responses?
- Do they indicate why the author’s claim is preferable?
- Do transitions (signposts such as Furthermore, In contrast, and Consider as an example) guide the reader through the argument?
- Does the essay end effectively, with a paragraph bringing a note of closure – for instance, by indicating that the proposed solution is relatively simple? By admitting that although the proposed solution will be difficult to implement, it is certainly feasible? By reminding the reader of the urgency of the problem?
Organization Analysis Paper
WRITERS – ASK YOURSELF
- Did I end up talking about anything in the introduction?
- Did I comment on the author’s direction of the paper?
- Did I mention anything about the thesis or claim?
- Am I giving them the thesis?
- Do I introduce everything I’m analyzing?
- Do I cite examples for what I’m analyzing?
- Do I explain what I see and actually analyze?
WRITERS – ASK YOURSELF
- Did I end up talking about anything in body paragraphs?
- Did I comment on the author’s claims in those paragraphs?
- Did I mention anything about the evidence given?
- Do I talk about the flow or order of paragraphs?
- Do I introduce everything I’m analyzing?
- Do I cite examples for what I’m analyzing?
- Do I explain what I see and actually analyze?
WRITERS – ASK YOURSELF
- Did I end up talking about anything in the conclusion?
- Did I comment on the author’s note of closure?
- Did I mention anything about the possible research needed to be done?
- Do I talk about the possible send-off given?
- Do I introduce everything I’m analyzing?
- Do I cite examples for what I’m analyzing?
- Do I explain what I see and actually analyze?
- Keep the following in mind about constructing an Introduction:
- Introduction
- Orientate the reader.
- Grab their attention
- Introduce the topic.
- Give background information if needed
- Define important key terms or ideas.
- Identify the focus/purpose
- Introduce the essay at hand.
- Develop your stance on the organization of it.
- Choose a definite view on the effective of the organization.
- Outline the scope of the essay.
- Provide a map for the reader.
- Show where the argument will go.
- State thesis.
- Give thesis and supporting claims
- Remember some things we can do with our body paragraphs:
- Body Paragraphs
- Topic Sentence
- Tell the reader what the paragraph is about.
- State the supporting claim for the thesis.
- Supporting Details
- Introduce an idea for the topic.
- Give an example/evidence to support the topic.
- Explain the use/application of the evidence.
- What does it say?
- What does it mean?
- How does it apply?
- Repeat evidences and explanation as necessary.
- Concluding Sentence
- Summarize the mini argument.
- Tie everything together.
- Transition to next topic.
- Remember some things we can do in our Conclusions:
- Conclusion
- Restate the thesis.
- Remind the reader of the purpose of the essay.
- Summarize the argument.
- Remind the reader what they just read.
- Explain why it is all important.
- Tie it together and explain how it proves the thesis.
- Offer further research.
- Were there things you couldn’t find?
- Are there other things to consider?
- Leave the reader with a send-off.
- Leave the reader thinking.
- End on a strong note.
- Ask a question if your thesis is the answer.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!