Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Educational Law Professional Development Session
Create a PowerPoint based on your outline from Week 4. You will turn the outline into a 10- to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation (not including separate title and reference slides) in which you develop a policy proposal for implementing the changes that you seek.The purpose of this PowerPoint is to practice and gain feedback as you present introductory information on your chosen topic. Ensure that you are using graphics in a meaningful way and that you are using each section of notes (under each slide) to elaborate on the key points of your slide. The notes section is for you to be able to use it as a script for what you would say during the presentation.
The outline from Week 4 has been attached.
attachment
ECE673Week4Assignment.docx
Educational Law Professional Development Session
2Presentation topic: Teacher Negligence
Shakina D. McBride
ECE 673: Advocacy, Policy, and Social Justice in Early Childhood Education
Dr. Cindy Washington
December 7, 2020
Presentation Topic: Teacher Negligence
Attention getter: The probable explanation an educator will confront lawful activity is in carelessness where the students are hurt while under the school’s insurance.
Presentation purpose: The purpose of the presentation is to analyze the four elements of negligence that must be satisfied for teachers to be held liable for the injury of students.
Background information: Once inside the schoolhouse door, public school teachers do not enjoy the same rights as they enjoy outside the school. They need to take the risk of teacher negligence seriously. Teachers are expected to create safe learning environments for children.
Main point 1: The first element of negligence is the duty of care
a. One of the factors that constitute teacher negligence is the failure of care by the teachers. Teachers have a duty to protect students from injuries. The obligation of care isn’t total as it just reaches out to assurance from hurt where the danger of injury is sensibly predictable (Fowler, 2019).
b. For example, they must separate students who want to engage in a fight. Teachers also must discipline the ongoing bullying of a student
c. Courts must determine whether the injury was foreseeable. Foreseeable injuries are the ones that a teacher would have prevented. The factors examined when establishing whether an injury was foreseeable are the experience of a teacher, the risk of the situation, and the age of the student.
Main point 2: The second element is the breach of duty
a. After establishing the duty of care, it must be proved that the teacher acted in a way that breached the duty.
b. The norm of care expected of an educator is that of a sensible parent (Newnham, 2020).
c. When establishing a breach of duty, it is necessary to show that a reasonably prudent person would have acted differently and would have upheld the duty of care.
Main point 3: Causation
A. There must be an actual link between the harm suffered by the student and the negligence of the teacher. This is the causal connection between the failed duties of the teacher and the injury. Causation is often the most difficult element to establish (Stader, 2013).
B. The teacher’s breach of duty has to result in the injury either directly or indirectly.
C. An example is when a child runs with scissors and trips injuring themselves. This could be the teacher’s fault because he should have condoned the behavior. A reasonably prudent person has to know to keep the children from running with scissors.
Main point 4: Damages
a. The damages are the actual injuries suffered by the children. It has to be established that the child has suffered an injury with measurable damages (Stader, 2013).
b. Medical bills are normally used to determine the extent of an injury or damages. The higher the medical bills, the more serious the injury was, and the longer it will take for the child to recover.
c. The students might suffer psychological financial or physical damages.
Closing summary
The four components of teacher negligence are the duty of care, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Teachers should ensure that they understand the tort of negligence to avoid potential lawsuits by the parents. Whenever there is an accident, teachers should follow the school policies. They should also ensure that they document adequate details about the events such as how the mishap has happened and the idea of wounds.
References
Fowler, M. (2019). Negligence in schools: Educating educators about their liability. Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper, (22).
Newnham, H. (2020). When is a teacher or school liable for negligence? Australian Journal of teacher education, 25(1), 5.
Stader, D. L. (2013). Law and ethics in educational leadership (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://www.vitalsource.com
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!