Discussion on What Makes A Good Bio
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Discussion on What Makes A Good Bio
Prescriber Bios
What makes a good bio?
Narrative voice: this should be written in third-person narrative (He/She/They), not first-person (“I”). You should be talking about yourself as if you are someone else.
Length – 5-sentence minimum, 7-sentence maximum.
Professional yet personable – this should be your selling point, a chance to create buy-in for a client. Why should a client choose you over any other Prescriber available in their state?
Focus on Mental Health – all details should center around or relate to mental health (no other specialties).
Avoid redundancy – each sentence should add a new idea or piece of information.
This is not a resume – you don’t need to list every single degree or name every school you attended. This can make the bio dry and cause the reader to lose interest. However, emphasize impressive degrees and licenses (typically, the highest achieved degree/license from your top school).
Passion for the mission – this creates continuity within the organization and makes the client feel like you have their best interest at heart.
Personal element – this humanizes you as part of their care team and brings you down to the level of the client. Sometimes it can be intimidating to seek mental health, so being able to feel comfortable with a Prescriber can really make a difference. Clients are more likely to choose you if they can connect with something from your bio.
Spelling, punctuation, and grammar – make sure to proofread your bio to ensure the writing is polished. Utilize Google Search if you are unsure of the correct forms.
QUOTES: this is ideally a mantra you live by which is also relevant to the Prescriber role.
Example: Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds that you plant. – Robert Louis Stevenson
Please do not include quotation marks.
Add a period to the end of the quote.
Provide only one dash between the quote and the speaker.
Introduction with license, specifying Psychiatric if certified (1-2 sentences):
If certified PMHNP, “Jane Doe is a board-certified Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner.”
If not psychiatric certified, “Jane Doe is a board-certified nurse practitioner” (don’t specify family or geriatric, etc).
Origin/Background (1-2 sentences):
She started her career working as a psychiatric assistant in a mental hospital at the age of 18. Jane went on to complete her Registered Nursing Degree and worked in intensive care in several hospitals across the country.
Experience/Education/Specialties/Skills (1-2 sentences):
She then went on to receive a Master of Science in Nursing in Education and served as Assistant Professor at Texas A&M. She has worked in many diverse areas including Cardiology, Urgent Care, Preventative Medicine, Women’s Health, and Psychiatry.
Passion for the mission (1 sentence):
Her training experiences in both large metropolitan areas and very rural areas with limited access to health care have ignited a passion to provide access to affordable, quality mental health care no matter where a patient may be located.
Personal element (1 sentence):
In her free time, you can find her in the gym perfecting her Muay Thai technique, tickling the ivories, or relishing one too many donuts.
Quote (1 sentence):
Don’t judge each day by the harvest you reap but by the seeds that you plant. – Robert Louis Stevenson
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!