Discussion on Replacing Effective Practices
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Discussion on Replacing Effective Practices
a minimum of 500 words
We’re always on the lookout for the next cutting-edge educational practice. Although much of the focus of innovation is on the future, we must find ways to use what we already know to get to new places. You will reflect on how we can use existing knowledge while implementing new educational practices in this discussion. Watch SVP Boston before continuing with this discussion (2012).
Create a first response that addresses the following points:
The first part is dedicated to research.
Find one scholarly resource that looks at how innovative practices are used in education. Technology does not have to be a part of the innovative practice.
Give a complete APA citation for this source.
Give a synopsis of the resource you found. This summary should be at least 100 words long, but no longer than 150.
Part 2: Take a moment to reflect.Please respond to the following questions:
Is it possible to combine “old” and “new”? How can educators make use of their existing knowledge while incorporating new technologies and practices?
Guided Reaction: At least two classmates should receive your responses. Consider the responses of your classmates in your response. You might want to think about the following questions in your response:How do you think you and your classmates feel about innovative practice?
Do you agree or disagree with your classmates’ presentation of the application of prior knowledge?
introduction
Early visual materials, including film, and Pressey’s teaching machine (1926), which was based on E. L. Thorndike’s theories, can be traced back to the early twentieth century (1913). Those early activities, like so many others today, were centered on the media. B. F. Skinner introduced programmed instruction in the 1950s, in which learners are given frequent questions with immediate feedback and are given instruction in small steps.The PLATO system was created at the University of Illinois in the 1960s and was used to deliver instruction until the 1980s. While there was a lot of good courseware created for PLATO, it all started in the electrical engineering department. Educators were quickly interested, but technology was driving progress. Many new technologies for authoring, programming, delivering, and evaluating instruction have emerged in response to technological advancements in industry. Rarely has educational technology been developed solely to meet a need in the classroom. Mobile technologies are a good example. Without understanding the potential effectiveness of such devices, many educators and others quickly concluded that mobile technologies should be used for education because they are ubiquitous.
In this unit, you’ll learn how to make the most of new technology while sticking to tried-and-true practices and paradigms from the past.
ARTICLE
W. O. Lee, W. O. Lee, W. O. Lee, W (2012). Learning for the future: Is the fourth way the emergence of lifelong learning and internationalisation of education? 53-64 in Educational Research for Policy and Practice, vol. 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-011-9122-9The full-text version of this article is available in the Ashford University Library’s ERIC database.
ISVP MULTIMEDIA BOSTON (2012, March 21). Tony Wagner gives a talk on how to create innovators (Links to an external site.). YouTube.Statement on Accessibility (Links to an external site.)
Policy on Personal Information Protection
Examine how innovation and technology are influencing today’s teaching and learning, as well as how educators, administrators, and other leaders can influence change while maintaining traditional strengths.
Propose roles and actions for educators who are change agents and early adopters in order to help them establish new educational paradigms that embrace technology and encourage innovation.
600 x 600 x 600 x 600 x 600 x 600 x 600
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!