Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
questions
1- Assume you are the Director of Maintenance for a Part 135 operator. You need trained, experienced technicians to maintain and inspect your fleet. You have several Airframe and Powerplant (A&P) technicians and certificated repairmen on your staff. It is the end of the overnight maintenance shift, and a 100-hour inspection has just been completed on a King Air. You have just arrived in the morning and are looking for someone to sign an airworthiness release in accordance with 14 CFR Part 135.443.
a. Can Patricia, a certified repairman who did part of the work on the 100-hour inspection, sign the airworthiness release? (Read through Parts 135.443 and 65.105, and the BCAM text Chapter 3)
b. Or, do you need to have Joe, an A&P tech who also worked on the 100-hour inspection, sign the airworthiness release? (See 135.443 and 65.81)
a.
b.2- Assume that you are the Director of Maintenance of a Part 135 air taxi company that has its own in-house maintenance organization which can do some, but not all, maintenance, inspection, and repair functions on its fleet of Beech KIng Airs and Cessna Citation. There are other Part 145 repair stations (otherwise known as MROs-Maintenance and Repair Organizations) available for you to use for some of your company’s work. They generally specialize in “heavy maintenance and repair”. As the DOM, would you have the following work done “in-house” or by an outside MRO, and why (use your imagination)
a. Nose-gear collapse repair, King Air (aircraft can be ferried)
b. 100-hour inspection including oil change
c. 3500-hour hot section inspection of PT-6 engine
d. replacement of a starter-generator on a Citation Jet
a.
b.
c.
d.3- Compare and contrast the maintenance requirements required for a Fractional Ownership Program (see 14 CFR Part 91K; 91.1001 and others) and a Part 135 air taxi/commercial operator (see CFR Part 119.71 and others), covering such areas as:
a- Is a Director of Maintenance required for a Part 91K program?
b- Is a Director of Maintenance required for a Part 135 operation (119.71)?
c- Is a General Maintenance Manual (GMM) required for both Part 91 Subpart K; and for Part 135 Subpart J?
d- How about a maintenance technician employee training program? required for Part 91K? (91.1433) or Part 135 (135.433) , or both?
a-
b-
c-
d-4- Part 135.411 gives some options for different maintenance program for “9 passenger or less” aircraft. One of these is the option for an operator to develop its own Approved Aircraft Inspection Program under 135.419. Contrast these options with the aircraft maintenance program for Fractional Ownership Program aircraft, required under 91.1109, 91.1411, and 91.1413. What are those options?
5- Assume that your Part 135 company, which operates Beech King Airs, needs to find a new Director of Maintenance (DoM). Ms. Allen has the following recent experience within the past 6 years:
-2 years of experience maintaining single-engine Cessna 208 turboprops for a Part 135 cargo operator.
-2 years of experience repairing aircraft at a Part 145 repair station, but no experience in approving aircraft for return to service at that employer.
a-Does the applicant Ms. Allen meet Part 119.71 requirements to be a Part 135 Director of Maintenance?
b-If not, is there a way in the regulations that you can make an appeal to the FAA for a review of her qualifications?
a-
b-
answers
Question 1
a) a. A certified repairman will sign the airworthiness release as provided in part 65.Question 2
a. nose gear collapse repair, King Air
• Can be done in, in house repair this is because King Air ‘in house’ repair has been approved to repair landing gears by FAA
b. 100 hour inspection including oil change
• Can be done in, in house repair this because it is done more frequently.
c. 3500 hour hotspot inspection of PT6 engine
• Can be done in an outside MRO this is because a complete replacement may be required.
d. Replacement of starter generator on a citation jet
• Can be done in, in house repair this because a starter generator can fail at any given time.
Question 3
a. Is a Director of Maintenance required for a Part 91K program?
• Yes, as instructed by FAA program
b. Is a Director of Maintenance required for a Part 135 operation (11.71)?
• Yes
c. Is General Maintenance Manual (GMM) required for part 91 subpart K; and for part 135 subpart J?
• No.
• For part 91 subpart K requires program operating manual
d. How about a maintenance technician employee training program? Required for part 91K? (91.1433) or part 135 (135.433) or both?
• Both require a training program.
Question 4
Options given in part 135.411
• Seats of an aircraft that carry passengers excluding any pilot seats can be maintained under maintenance program 135.415.
• An operator who is not otherwise required may elect to maintain its aircraft under paragraph (a) of part 135.11
Fractional ownership program is a maintenance under airworthiness and a director of maintenance or equivalent position should be employed to work under CAMPQuestion 5
a. Ms. Allen cannot fit to be a director of maintenance. She didn’t met part 119.71 requirements to be part 135
b. A certificate holder may request a deviation for her if the manager of air transport division find her experience comparable and can perform the functions in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and the procedures outlined in the certificate holder’s manual.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!