Development of an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Evidence-Based Practice Paper
Topic: Development of an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Guideline
- PROBLEM –
- Discussion of the problem and why it is significant to nursing practice and healthcare.
- The PICO question is presented in this section.
- EVIDENCE –
- What databases did you use to find your evidence? What were your search terms for the evidence?
- Summarize the evidence you found on the topic that answers the PICO question.
- Include the appendices to your paper per APA guidelines for formatting. Be sure to reference the Appendices in your paper text.
- What are your specific recommendations for a practice change?
- TRANSLATION –
- What is the feasibility, fit and appropriateness of your recommendations, including potential barriers? Costs, resources, personnel? Barriers to implementation?
- Develop an action plan which will include support and resources needed for implementation.
- What method will you evaluate if the change proposed is effective?
- Specific measurable goals and a timeline for implementation and evaluation.
- How could you disseminate the findings of your proposed change in nursing practice?
- CONCLUSION – brief summary of your paper
- APA Formatting
- Running head, page numbers and title page
- Section headings correct per APA
- Reference page includes articles from Evidence Appendix plus 4 additional ones to support your content in other sections of the paper.
- Appendices placed and formatted per APA guidelines.
- Guidelines for EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE PAPER
- Topic: Development of an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Guideline Scholarly paper about your suggested guideline. Your topic is a nursing focused topic of interest to you that is relevant to your practice setting. Your paper will include sections on
- You will:
- Research and appraise the relevant evidence related to the question for the guideline. You will need additional articles to support your proposed change in additions to the articles you will utilize in developing the APPENDICES. See rubric for more information. Note: You develop the individual Evidence Appendix which requires 2 references for each level of evidence (Dang & Dearholt model).
- Synthesize and discuss the readings and your research findings related to the nursing practice question and the resulting guideline.
- You must address the topics in the grade rubric including the required tables and barriers to implementation in practice. Evidence of synthesis of knowledge gained is expected in the paper.
- Follow APA guidelines for paper, citations, references, and appendices.
- The paper will be based on or utilize class assignments and discussions throughout the course. The course is designed to provide the information to be incorporated into the paper as well as the guideline.
- FINAL EBP PAPER F 2016
FINAL EBP PAPER F 2016 Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose and overview of problem Relevance and significance to practice
50 pts EXCEPTIONAL -Topics are covered in a complete and concise manner. All areas must be addressed.
40 pts GOOD – Topics are covered but limited substance. Missing no more than once area.
30 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT – Topics only slightly covered and paper lacks substance. Missing significant areas in paper discussion.
0 pts LACKING/INSUFFICIENT – Incomplete or confusing. (0 points)
50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence of critical thinking
50 pts EXCEPTIONAL – Demonstrates clear understanding of the topics. Relates readings to research and summarizes information gained and how applies to research and evidenced-based professional nursing practice.
40 pts GOOD – Conveys understanding of the topics. Some inconsistencies in making connections between readings and research and/or summarizing the information. Limited application to research and evidenced-based professional nursing practice.
30 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT – Paper lacks substance, limited evidence of understanding the topic. Connections between readings and research are unclear, not firmly established, or are not obvious. Minimal or unclear application to research and evidenced-based professional nursing practice.
0 pts LACKING/INSUFFICIENT – Lack of understanding. No evidence of connections between readings and research. No application to evidenced-based professional nursing practice. (0 points)
50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence Table Evidence (Dearholt & Dang, p 246) Summary Table with recommendations (Dearholt & Dang, p 250)
30 pts Table contains at least 2 articles per level of evidence Summary table completed with clearly demonstrated understanding of evidence appraisal. References from current peer reviewed nursing journals. Appendices must be included in the paper (30 points)
20 pts Table contains at least 2 articles per level of evidence Summary table completed conveys understanding of evidence appraisal. Lacking appropriate resources or references. (Not nursing or peer reviewed). Appendices must be included in the paper (20 points)
10 pts Table contains 1 article per level of evidence Summary table demonstrated minimal understanding of evidence appraisal. Resources less than relevant or reliable. OR only one Appendix included (10 points)
0 pts LACKING/ INSUFFICIENT – No articles per level of evidence and no understanding of the evidence appraisal. (0 points)
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources / References
30 pts EXCEPTIONAL -Includes at least 4 references from current peer reviewed nursing journals; or 2 from journals and 2 from reading or a reliable education, government or organizational website. These references are in addition to the articles used in the evidence tables. TOTAL 14.
20 pts GOOD- Table contains at least 2 articles per level of evidence Summary table completed conveys understanding of evidence appraisal. Lacking appropriate resources or references. (Not nursing or peer reviewed). total 13
10 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Less than 3 references. Resources less than relevant or reliable. These references are in addition to the articles used in the evidence tables. TOTAL 12 or fewer
0 pts LACKING/ INSUFFICIENT – Resources not mentioned and no reference citations. (0 points)
30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar Spelling
10 pts EXCEPTIONAL – Proper grammar, spelling
6 pts GOOD -Contains minor errors in grammar, spelling
3 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT -Multiple errors in grammar and spelling (5 points)
0 pts LACKING/ INSUFFICIENT – Lacking grammatical or spelling consistency (0 points)
10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
10 pts EXCEPTIONAL – Well organized, thought out, and structured.
6 pts GOOD- Organized and structured. Minor problems with clarity & conciseness
3 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT – Poor structure and/or organization, distracting.
0 pts LACKING/ INSUFFICIENT -Lacks organization or structure. (0 points)
10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format and Citations
20 pts EXCEPTIONAL -APA formatting and citations correct. Paper formatted per APA guidelines. Fewer than 2 errors (30 points.)
15 pts GOOD – Between 3-4 errors in APA formatting. (20 points)
10 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT – Between 5 and 6 APA formatting errors. (10 points)
0 pts LACKING/ INSUFFICIENT -Greater than 6 APA formatting errors (0 points)
20 pts Total Points: 200
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!