Deeper Learning Through Teaching Power Point Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Description / paper instructions
NO SUMMARY OR DRAFT IS REQUIRED!
You will create a PowerPoint presentation and presentation script for the final assignment in this course, which you will share with your organization’s official and informal leaders in order to prepare for an organizational change process. The Belmont Abbey teaching case will act as a vehicle for demonstrating your ideas. You will be expected to use graphical presentations of information and systems diagrams in your presentation to demonstrate the case’s organizational dynamics.
What You Should Know About Teaching for Deeper Learning
The following short essays demonstrate the importance of explaining concepts to others and anticipating their queries. Teaching as a genuine practice exercise is almost as effective as teaching others. The Feynman Technique is easy to use and understand. It will become second nature if you use it on a regular basis throughout your doctoral study.
Farman Street is a street in Farman, New York (n.d.). The Feynman method is the most effective approach to learn anything. [Blog entry]. R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. Rusczyk, R. (2013). Teaching is a method of learning. Learning via teaching was extracted from https://artofproblemsolving.com/news/articles/learning-through-teaching.
Two noteworthy quotes from the aforementioned readings:
Your ideas will never be more powerful than your capacity to communicate them to others. (Ruscyzk, para. 1; Ruscyzk, para. 1; Ruscyzk, para. 1
…Richard Feynman recognized the distinction between understanding something and knowing its name… (Paragraph 3 of Farnum Street, n.d.)
A Quick Overview of Systems ThinkingThis is a classic introduction to systems thinking that is easier to follow if you have some prior knowledge of systems. To help integrate and consolidate knowledge, it’s often beneficial to revisit newly taught concepts in a different format. After studying systems thinking and archetypes, as well as a change process that strongly relies on systems thinking, reading the Kim article below at this point in the course should feel familiar and reinforce your learning of systems thinking at the same time. The goal is for you to improve your understanding of systems thinking principles and methods, as well as your ability to apply systems thinking to real-world organizational situations.
D. H. Kim, D. H. Kim, D. H. Kim, D (1999). [PDF] An introduction to systems thinking. Prepare: Case Study (https://thesystemsthinker.com/introduction-to-systems-thinking/)
GET READY: CASE STUDY
A Real-Life Example
To prepare for this week’s homework, Teaching Case Study: Belmont Abbey, read the following.
R. Anderson and M. A. Roberto (2016). Belmont Abbey College: Developing a Strategy in Tough Times Harvard Business Publishing, Boston, MA.
Instructions for the Assignment
BELMONT ABBEY AS A TEACHING CASE STUDYPreparation
You will create a PowerPoint presentation and a presentation script for this task.
Read the following teaching case if you haven’t already:
R. Anderson and M. A. Roberto (2016). Belmont Abbey College: Developing a Strategy in Tough Times Harvard Business Publishing, Boston, MA.
Review the PowerPoint Presentation Guidelines [PPTX] for more information.
The PowerPoint slides should adhere to the above-mentioned presentation criteria. To describe the organizational dynamics of the case to your students, your slides must incorporate graphical presentations of information and system diagrams. The information from the case exhibits should also be included in your presentations.
The screenplay will serve as your teaching narrative, with explanations for each slide to help your students grasp the topics. Use the comments you received on your homework in Week 7 to address all aspects of the lesson in a clear and correct manner. As you finish your project, anticipate questions and areas of misunderstanding so that your plans are comprehensive and learner-centered. Include graphics if needed, and make use of the information in the case.
Scenario for the AssignmentAssume you are a formal or unofficial leader in your company. You and your supervisor (or the rest of your leadership team) are conducting research on your company’s difficulties and strategic position in order to plan and implement a series of improvement projects. In casual conversation with others in the team, you have shared some of the ideas from this course and piqued their curiosity. As a result, you’ve been requested to convey the course concepts to the entire team so that they, too, can begin to widen and deepen their perspectives on organizational learning, change, and improvement.
You decide to utilize Belmont Abbey as a teaching case to help your staff understand the essential course ideas. You will create a collection of teaching materials in the form of a PowerPoint presentation and a script to convey the course principles for this task. You’ll help your team comprehend systems thinking, systems archetypes, and change and action research inquiry procedures by using examples from the case. You will synthesize course principles and gain a deeper knowledge of their application to practice situations as you create these teaching resources.
Instructions
Create a PowerPoint presentation and accompanying script (or speaker’s notes) that includes the bolded elements below:
Introduce the situation.
Preliminary The Case’s Introduction: Prepare a summary of the case for your staff. Provide a description of the Belmont Abbey case that enables the intended audience to comprehend the case, including events, stakeholders, and difficulties to be discussed.
Analyze practice problems using disciplines from learning organizations.
Disciplines: Apply the four fundamental disciplines (personal mastery, mental models, team learning, and shared vision) to the case and analyze the extent to which the discipline(s) reveals organizational dynamics and contributes to organizational learning or difficulties.
Examine the organizational flaws and system problems in the situation.
Archetypes of Systems: In the case, explain and map at least one example of a systems archetype. At least one system map should be included in your presentation.
Based on the scenario, make recommendations for the organization’s change management practices.
Prior to offering change management techniques, demonstrate critical thinking tools to discover assumptions the stakeholders in the case may have made, and build a set of questions you would ask to help the stakeholders reveal their assumptions and define the steps needed for future advancement. Reference In your remarks, please include the text Critical Thinking: Tools for Taking Charge of Your Learning and Your Life by Paul and Elder.
Describe and explain how the four-stage change process could be used by Belmont Abbey officials to improve the strategic planning process and increase the likelihood of one of the college’s efforts succeeding. Describe how your collection of questions will help you identify stakeholder assumptions and define the steps you’ll need to make progress in the future. Refer to the text “Thinking for Social Change” by Stroh.
Propose an inquiry model for the organization’s next phase of improvement.
Cycle of Inquiry: Demonstrate and explain how the college leadership could use an inquiry approach like ARPP/action research to develop the next step of improvement or change.
Recommendations: Make a list of concrete, realistic suggestions about how the president should proceed. Show how your suggestions are in line with the college’s purpose, vision, and values.
Questions: Finish by posing at least three discussion questions to assist reveal team members’ assumptions and support their investigation and understanding of the major concepts you’ve given.
Additional ConditionsPresentation Length: As needed to meet the assignment’s criteria.
References: As many as you need to back up your argument. At the end of your PowerPoint presentation, include a reference list slide.
Speaker’s Notes or a Separate Script: This can be offered as speaker’s notes or as a separate script.
APA Citation Style and Format: Throughout your presentation, make sure you employ the APA citation style.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!