Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
What did you find to be compelling and enlightening? And what other advice could you give from your experience.
Define the terms culture, ethnocentrism, and prejudice, and describe their relationship to one another.
According to Northouse (2018, Ch. 16), culture is a commonly shared set of beliefs, values, and norms of a group of people. Ethnocentrism is the human inclination to place our own group as the focus of how we see and judge other groups. According to Northouse (2018, Ch. 16), prejudice consists of judgments about others based on fixed attitudes without any factual basis to come to the determination. In relationship to each other, a sense of pride is in all three.
A pride of belonging to the group, or pride in finding faults with other groups. Pride comes with blind spots, and as leaders, blind spots will ultimately harm an organization. If for the sake of pride, decisions are made, they will be unsustainable, and the challenges of overcoming prideful decisions will be the undoing of the leader and the organization. A positive workplace culture that incorporates the bountiful goodness of different individual cultures without ethnocentrism or prejudice will be a powerful entity. If any amount of ethnocentrism or prejudice creeps into the organization, it will become cancerous.
Case study 16.1: Briefly discuss how you see these concepts in action in the case.
Ms. Tanaka is at a crossroads in her leadership development and delivery. From a cultural standpoint, she is more assertive and aggressive than traditional females from Japan. For the sake of argument, although the case study does not specify, the assumption is that she is of Japanese descent. From an ethnocentric perspective, it appears that Ms. Tanaka’s delivery is more in tune with North American workers.
It appears that she identifies more with the scope that being assertive was expected, and thus not well received in a traditional Japanese work environment. The prejudice comes into view when she receives praise from a supervisor who then flips the praise to inform that she is perceived as pushy and not a team player. Had it been a male receiving kudos for performance, it seems unlikely that the male would receive negatives about what image peers have.
How would you coach leadership of the organization in the case to be more effective and supportive of diverse people?
Coaching leadership to embrace the totality of the cultural diversity policy would be the first step. If assimilation into the “ways” of American business is the intent, allowing a performer (Ms. Tanaka) to have a voice is essential. One foot in and one foot out is not the best way to integrate into a culture. If leadership is not comfortable with being all in, they should reconsider their policy and change it. The policy is not worth the paper it is written on if it does not apply to all. Policies that are inclusive and enforceable are best when leadership does their part in implementation and enforcement.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!