Content Dissemination Over VANET: Boosting Utility Based Heuristics Using Interests
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Content Dissemination Over VANET: Boosting Utility Based Heuristics Using Interests
Introduction:
This paper focuses on dissemination of decentralized opinion polls over VANETs (Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks) of self-interested peers. For comparing heuristics, we compute utility of achieved dissemination from senders perspective. The main goal is to calculate behaviour of self-interested senders. Utility model is also generated where the highest is given to the items generated by sender followed by similar opinion and least is given to opposite opinion. Based on VANET experiments we determine parameters for the model.
Theoretical and Empirical issues:
In this paper, there are a few logical inconsistencies. Like on page 1, he failed to give more insight about the DV-CAST broadcasting protocol and the way he justified it by giving a reason due to increase in performance is disappointing. Some of the measures used in this study were validated by past studies but when placed together there are overlaps among the measures. The author also did a logical assumption that in uninformed heuristics all peers are interested in all the items current peer has, he did not give enough justification to prove his theory. If he did so, then it would give a good understanding to the reader. He also mentioned that the communication model presumes that each device broadcast data which it wants to disseminate at the same time it processes and listens to data that is broadcasted by nearby devices. But he could have also given more explanation for this, I suspect that even other readers would expect this in the paper.
Assumptions:
In this paper in some instances the author has given unexplained assumptions that need more clarification. I stated some of them below.
In page 1, each device is owned by user and the system is assumed to be open which means that user has complete control over the device.
In page 2, Software agents on wireless ad-hoc devices are assumed to broadcast messages consistently.
In page 4, queues that are used for sending data are long enough to supply data for the whole time and
In page 5, the author assumed that Np< Positives:
I appreciate the great work done by the author and I mentioned some of them below.
In page 3, simpler algorithms are used to handle received vote and witness messages it also carries other items.
In page 6, in the three scenarios the number of messages is successfully transmitted, and they are also shown in a proper tabular format.
Negatives:
I mentioned some of the drawbacks of the paper below on which the author should work on.
In page 2, In DirectDemocracyP2P, peer agents only store last signature given by each constituent for each motion.
In page 4, the author included some mathematical formulas, but he did not explain them clearly.
In page 6, the author mentioned that configuration of the network is automated on Windows and Linux but while on MacOS it must be done manually.
Overall, this the selected topic is interesting and despite its flaws it offers informative data to the readers.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!