The issue of term limits provides a fascinating intersection between the theoretical and practical. In a democracy, the will of people would theoretically be paramount. As such, if the people wish to re-elect their leaders, then it seems anti-democratic to put limits on their wishes. But, the real world poses some practical issues. Unrelated to populist sentiment that seasoned politicians have likely been corrupted by the political system and, as such, should be compelled to leave, there exists unquestionable advantages for incumbents against new comers. For example, incumbents have received several years of publicity due to their office. Therefore, their name recognition usually substantially exceeds their opponents. Further, due to the nature of our political system, incumbents are in position to provide political benefits to powerful interests and those powerful interests, in turn, then have a vested interest in keeping their political ally in office. Fortunately, you now have the power to change the Constitution. In 2-3 total paragraphs, please evaluate each of these proposals regarding term limits. Your evaluation should indicated which proposal you wish to adopt and your reasoning for your position. Presidential Term Limits: Proposal 1: Term limits are removed. Proposal 2: Presidents are elected for 1 six year term. No reelection ever. Proposal 3: Presidents are elected for 1 six year term. At the six year point, the President can run for a 2 year reelection. Proposal 4: Keep the system "as is" – two terms Congressional Term Limits: Proposal 1: Members of the House of Representatives may only serve for 10 years. (5, two year terms) Proposal 2: No term limits for members of the House of Representatives Proposal 3: Members of the Senate may only serve for 18 years (3 – 6 year year terms)