Conflict Resolution through Negotiation
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Homework 1
Conflict Resolution – Negotiation
Respond to the thread below. It must be a minimum of 400 words in length. In these responses you are to:
Reflect upon what youve learned from another students Initial Thread.
Tell us how it contributes to or furthers your understanding of this Courses subject matter.
Describe how you could apply what youve learned from another students Initial Thread in your work with clients either now or in the future.
Chapter 4: Power-Based Negotiation
Interpersonal power refers to the capacity of individuals or groups to influence each others attitudes and behaviors (Murdach, 2008). A person with interpersonal power skills can have a strong advantage in power-based negotiations (PBN). The PBN implies one party has power over the other, creates competition, and has no rules for fair play. As much as I do not think of myself as a power negotiator, there is use in the helping professional field. For example, in addition signing a behavioral agreement and acknowledging rules at the beginning of treatment, a client has been spoken with twice about repeatedly breaking rules or creating dangerous situations for others. Upon the third occurrence should I put the client on a behavior contract with specific expectations that if violated will result in administrative discharge from the program? I must examine my motives and determine if my behaviors are ethical which could include many variables. Does this client have the mental capacity to understand his actions and consequences or is he a bully? Has he made any progress? Should I be looking for a different level of care? Am I simply following my organizations standards or am I using my power?
Power is related to how we think, feel, behave, socialize and orient ourselves (Walch, 2012). Again, I see this as part of being mindful. Knowing and utilizing power-based strategies and tactics will empower me professionally and personally. Slide #9 of the power point lists persuasion strategies and in any form of negotiation persuasion can be useful, especially power based. I feel using reciprocity, scarcity, likeability, authority, consistency, and consensus would be allow me at times to get some sort of agreement. By making something sweet to others I can gain a bit of ground in the negotiation process. Keeping BATNA, or Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement, is powerful to me also. The stronger your BATNA, the stronger your negotiating power (p. 167). After all, negotiations can be long and arduous.
Chapter 5: Rights-Based Negotiation
Rights-based negotiation (RBN) is an adversarial process in which each party tries to prove he is right in the sense of being accurate, appropriate, fair, or consistent with relevant rules and laws (p.194). The pros and cons listed on slide #5 of the power point state RBN is just, fair, objective, rational, and civil. Cons are that it promotes relationship struggle, stagnates creativity, there is no win-win, and it leads to blaming. Like PBN it is adversarial, however power cant be used due to laws prohibiting certain behaviors and encouraging others such as fair play and due process. Concessions are made but can be challenging due to morals, beliefs, and values. RBN focuses on just finding a solution.
Chapter 6: Interest-Based Negotiation
Interest-Based Negotiation (IBN) promotes collaboration in relationships to act in the best interests of all parties, not positions. Utilizing communication theory to openly share interests and social exchange theory where tangible and intangible resources can be utilized to alleviate conflict. Rational decision-making theory where although people usually act in the best interests of self, they will be motivated to work with other parties interests because both will benefit, and this creates a win-win situation. Participants ask about each others needs, brainstorm options for the benefit of both parties, identify and apply objective criteria, identify, and resolve past miscommunication problems if they exist, anticipate future problems to get ahead of them, identify constructive strategies, consider alternatives, and obtain commitments.
The problem with IBN can be if the parties involved have strong emotions, distrust, fear, and/or anger. Emotions must be balanced with reason for effective IBN. Also, if core values differ significantly IBN may not be the right way to go. Observing cultural biases, having equal goals, and the desire to come to mutually satisfying agreement are necessary for IBN to be successful.
References:
Barsky, A. E. (2017). Conflict Resolution for the Helping Professions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Barsky, A. E. (2018, 8 30). Power Point.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!