compensation package of a CEO
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
compensation package of a CEO
Running head: CASE STUDY 3
Abstract
As the human resource director, Don must analyze the compensation package of the CEO to ensure that all employees are being paid fairly. Outlining all factors that are considered when creating the compensation package is vital for all employees. Frontline staff is very important to an organization, but the success of an organization can depend on the retention of the CEO. The compensation package can determine the retention of the CEO.
There are many components that make up executive pay and it is the responsibility of Don, the director of human resources to summarize each component. Based on the criteria to establish the pay rate for the CEO, it may be required for Don to collect additional information. Three prominent theories describe the processes related to setting executive compensation: agency theory, tournament theory, and social comparison theory (Marticchio, 2017). If the agency theory is used, Don may want to stress the CEO’s ownership within the organization. However, if the social comparison theory is utilized to outline the CEO’s salary, he may want to get information on the market rates of the CEO’s in the similar industries. It is also important for Don to identify the parts of the CEO’s salary that are associated with their performance. Although the company is not financially secure, Don should point out information that show the success that the CEO has accomplished in leading the company. With this information, Don may be able to show that although the organization is struggling financially, the state of the organization could be worse if it was not for the leadership of the CEO.
Don, the director of human resources, must navigate between adopting standardized “best practices” for their CEO’s pay plans, on the one hand, and customizing their CEO’s pay to align their particular CEO’s goals with those of shareholders, on the other (Hou, Priem, & Goranova). It is expected that Don will encounter difficult situations about the logic and fairness of a profitable compensation package for the CEO. Don should outline the pay differences to Oakwood employees by highlighting the connection with the CEO’s pay and performance. The skills, knowledge and expertise that is required by the CEO should be explained as they are greater than frontline employees and makes it necessary to offer a higher compensation package for the sake of retention. Organizations that pay higher equity-based compensation to executives should have a lower incidence of managerial decisions that are non-value maximizing because such actions would reduce the manager’s own personal wealth (Brisker, Colak, & Peterson, 2014). The contributions and professional milestones of the CEO that has helped the organization grow or sustain should be presented to the employees so they are able to recognize the ability the CEO has to continue to more the company forward, especially during a time when the organization is struggling financially.
The CEO’s salary is directly related to the success of the company and it is Dan’s responsibility to ensure that all employees are aware how the compensation package is created. Since 2007-2008, CEO compensation has drawn a great deal of attention and scrutiny from academics, regulators and the general public at large (Harper & Zin, 2016). Many scholars have researched the inequality of CEOs pay compared to other employees within the organization. After accounting for economically drivers of pay, such as size of the company, industry affiliation, and macroeconomics conditions (Gupta & Wowak, 2017) they were not able to determine the pay is always fair. The inconsistent findings on the extent to which CEOs are rewarded or penalized in response to their companies’ performance have been a particular source of controversy (Gupta & Wowak, 2017). The majority of the employees will not be rewarded or penalized in the same manner as the CEO based on the success or failure of the organization. The compensation package for the CEO of an organization is designed to reward the CEO for leading the company in a direction the is profitable, however if the CEO makes decisions that will cost the organization resources they will be penalized in their salary and bonus pay.
Don must decide the best method to explain the pay disparities to the employees within in the organization. One approach he could use to defining how the compensation package is created for the CEO for the organization. All factors, such as benefits, pay for performance, vacation, and retirement benefits, that are used to create the compensation package for the CEOs and other employees. As we know, the compensation package for the CEO will be different from other top executives due to the CEO is ultimately responsible for the success of the organization. Market-based theories predict that differences in CEO skills lead to potentially large differences in pay, but it is challenging to quantify the CEO skill premium in pay (Falato, Li, & Milbourn, 2015). Although all employees will have similar benefits, due to the hierarchy of the CEO they will have a much higher compensation package than executive leadership within the organization. In some industries, the CEO has skills that are very rare which would require the organization to create a more competitive compensation package. In any organization, the goal is to have a high retention rate in the CEO position. Although the frontline employees are the backbone of any organization, the CEO is the major decision maker for the organization. The CEO is responsible for making decisions that would move the organization forward.
In conclusion, Don must analyze the compensation package for the CEO to ensure that it is equitable and fair. As the human resources director, Don is responsible for making sure that all employees are paid fairly. Many may feel the CEO of the organization is overpaid, however they don’t take into consideration that the success and failures of the organization is riding on the shoulders of the CEO. The CEO has a lot of responsibilities within the organization and should be fairly compensated. Frontline employees are only responsible for the job they have been assigned, but the CEO is responsible for everything and everyone within the organization. The success and failures are depending on the decisions the CEO make for the organization; they are compensated for the successes of the organization and penalized for the failures the organization may experience. The role of the CEO is very important and a competitive compensation package has the potential to hire a CEO that will move the organization forward.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!