Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Group Project
This is not more than a 20-page submission. In this assignment, students will go through the steps to set up a quantitative research study. The Instructor will divide the class into groups to complete the assignment in week 1. Each group should submit 1 topic selection in week 1, and 1 final report. This report should include qualitative and quantitative sections. Here are the main steps to perform this team project:Step #1: Topic selection: COMPARING AVERAGE ANNUAL PERCENT OF DIABETIC MEDICARE ENROLLEES AGE 65-75 YEARS HAVING HEMOGLOBIN A1c BETWEEN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.
The instructor will provide a list of topics; the team also should submit the team agreement plan with the selected topic in week 1 for the faculty feedback and approval.
Step #2: Performing Qualitative analysis
2.1. This section of the assignment is aimed at giving students an opportunity to select and analyze at least 5 articles using the ‘Review Manager 5’ tools to analyze the risk of bias for 5 selected articles following these steps:
– The methodological quality and risk of bias evaluation of the selected studies should be conducted independently by two team members, following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews (Higgins, 2011), a domain-based evaluation for each study should be done across five domains:
– Selection bias,
– Performance bias,
– Detection bias,
– Attrition bias, and
– Reporting bias.
The judgment of studies for potential bias should be indicated by assigning ‘low risk’, ‘high risk, or ‘unclear risk’, for each respective source of bias.
Reference
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. (n.d.). Retrieved July 12, 2019, from https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
2.2. Report your finding using the Bias-Tables and Bias-Plots.
Table 2. Literature Review, Table of Biases
Selection Bias Performance Bias Detection Bias Attrition Bias Reporting BiasAuthors Systematic differences between baseline characteristics of the groups that are compared. Systematic differences between groups in the care that is provided, or in exposure to factors other than the interventions of interest. Systematic differences between groups in how outcomes are determined. Systematic differences between groups in withdrawals from a study. Systematic differences between reported and unreported findings.
Author1, 2019 Y Y Y Y Y
Author2, 2019
Author3, 2019
Author4, 2019
Author5, 2019
Note: Y: Low risk, N: High risk, U: UnclearStep #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design. This is very similar to Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instructions for more details).
For this section:
3.1. Select one of the class data sets
3.2. Identify relevant variables
3.3. Indicate the statistical method you used for your analysis
3.4. Identify the statistical software your team used to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio)
3.5. Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should include:
3.5.1. Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue.
3.5.2. Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction.
3.5.3. Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section including descriptive table and plots
3.5.4. Discuss your findings
3.5.5. Discussion: for this section, compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section
3.5.6. Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your findings and LR.
Note: Make sure to submit your RStudio codes for your instructor review (for BONUS points).17 Competency Discussion Question project
Competency Discussion
Discussion Topic
For your Competency Discussion, consider how finance decisions are made where you work or at an organization with which you are familiar. Reflect on the tools that are used to determine these finance decisions. Finally, think about how these tools contribute to the decision-making process in the organization where you work or at an organization with which you are familiar.
To begin this Competency and meet your required engagement, post in the Discussion area a brief description of the organization with which you are familiar. Then describe the finance tools used to make finance decisions. Finally, explain how these tools contribute to the decision-making process.
Module 2 Pre-Assessment Submission
Assessment SubmissionNote: Although this formative pre-assessment is not graded, a submission is required before you can advance to your summative assessment.
The Module Pre-Assessment is your opportunity to practice applying module content before submitting the final Competency Assessment. In the Final Assessment, you will be asked to conduct a 5-year analysis of Jiranna Healthcares outpatient operational and financial data in order to determine whether or not it is an attractive project.
To prepare for your Final Assessment, complete the following 5-year calculations:
Net sales, operating expenses, operating income, and net income of Jiranna Healthcare.
Total profit margin, asset turnover, return on assets, and return on net worth.
Current ratio, days cash on hand, and working capital.
Debt ratio and times interest earned ratio.
Complete a DuPont analysis for each of the five most recent years.
Next, reflect on what each of the resulting data mean in terms of the:
Significance of the trend results.
Companys profitability.
Companys liquidity.
Companys long-term solvency.
Companys individual DuPont characteristics (e.g., total margin, total asset turnover & equity multiplier) and trends across the analysis period.
Finally, think about whether you would recommend purchasing Jiranna Healthcare and the rationale for your recommendation.
For this Module Pre-Assessment, create a rough draft of the 5-year analysis you conducted of Jiranna Healthcare outpaitent operational and financial data. Be sure to review the Final Assessment instructions for more information.
Note that you do not have to resubmit your Pre-Assessment to address feedback.
Module 3 Pre-Assessment Submission
Assessment SubmissionNote: Although this formative pre-assessment is not graded, a submission is required before you can advance to your summative assessment.
The Module Pre-Assessment is your opportunity to practice applying module content before submitting the final Competency Assessment. In the Final Assessment, you will be asked to complete a capital project spreadsheet based on the case study provided. You also will be asked to conduct a budgeting evaluation.
To prepare for your Final Assessment, review Capital Project Case Study and compete the capital project worksheet. Next, consider whether the project is acceptable assuming Jiranna Healthcare has a corporate policy of not accepting projects that take more than 3.5 years to pay for themselves, and assuming an 11% cost of capital. Then, review the Variance Analysis Case Study and reflect on the calculations that you conduct to answer questions regarding Jirannas profit forecast and revised projections and budgeting challenges as well as recommendations you would make for fee-for-service healthcare organizations and capitated healthcare organizations.
For this Module Pre-Assessment, create a draft of your report explaining whether the Capital Project Case Study project is acceptable and why. Then create a draft of your budgeting evaluation. Be sure to review the Final Assessment instructions for more information.
Note that you do not have to resubmit your Pre-Assessment to address fee18 Improving the Candidate Experience at Airbnb
Staffing Challenge Response
Improving the Candidate Experience at AirbnbTo improve its candidate experience, Airbnb set a goal to have job candidates walk away saying, Wow-those Airbnb people are so smart and coordinated-Im even more excited about the chance to work with them. 194 The recruiting team started by brainstorming how they wanted the hiring process to feel at each step and mapped out its ideal process from both the hiring teams and the candidates perspectives. They also benchmarked their auto-reply application messages and learned that theirs was the same boring message other companies were using. They wrote a new message that reinforced Airbnbs employer value proposition, outlined the next steps in the hiring process, and provided suggestions for what candidates could do while they waited to hear back (e.g., read the frequently asked questions on the website, watch company culture videos, etc.). 195 The recruiting team then created a variety of employer value-proposition-branded templates that could be quickly adapted by recruiters when communicating with candidates. The recruiting team was also given the responsibility to extend offer letters. This reduced the time it took for candidates to receive an offer to just a couple of days.196 They even held lunches to help employees improve and update their LinkedIn profiles because they knew candidates would be looking at them. Every week they started recognizing a recruiter who went the extra mile for a candidate, such as a hiring manager who went hiking on a Saturday to recruit a top prospect. 197 The on-site interview process was improved by giving each interviewer a distinct role ensuring that they dont ask the same questions. They also prep interviewers to help them tailor their approach to each candidate. For example, a manager might be sent a calendar interview invitation saying, Super passive candidate. Had coffee with Mike three months ago. Have been courting ever since. Need to sell. Candidates arriving for interviews are greeted with a personalized welcome note written on the white board in the interview room and are given a tour of the office to help reduce interview nerves and improve their ability to assess their fit. Rejected candidates are informed via e-mail but are invited to call for feedback if they would like. Airbnb feels that this gives the candidate time to digest the news, making the feedback conversation more productive and helping them feel more positively toward the company. After passing a certain stage of the hiring process, candidates are also given a coupon to thank them for the time they spent with Airbnb.198 The company also took steps to mitigate recruiting bias and hire more diverse employees by focusing on being objective and identifying the best candidates for the job, not just hiring the people they most wanted to hang out with. 199 The recruiting team worked with hiring managers to conduct a job analysis and identify the attributes for success in each role. After securing agreement on the right skill sets, the interview questions and scoring key were developed. Interviewers were also trained to objectively and accurately evaluate candidates. Interviewers were discouraged from looking for common passions and hobbies on a candidates resume because doing so promoted bias when they developed stronger connections based on similar interests that had nothing to do with job success. Unconscious bias training was also conducted. 200 The changes appear to be working as employee diversity has increased, 201 second-time candidates are increasing, and more friends of former candidates are applying. 202
19 HCM 320 Milestone One Template
HCM 320 Milestone One TemplateUse this template to compile important information and resources for your final project presentation.
1. Public Health Issue Topic: Identify the public health issue you will use as a basis for your final project presentation. Briefly describe why you choose this topic.
2. Economic Forces: Briefly describe some economic forces related to your public health issue.
Macroeconomic Forces:
Microeconomic Forces:
3. Key Regulation Policy: Determine economic policies or regulations that currently apply to your public health issue.
4. Benefits and Consequences: Identify the perceived benefits and consequences resulting from the legislation supporting your public health issue.
5. Impact of Regulation or Policy: Describe the economic impact resulting from the legislation supporting your public health issue.
6. References: Provide links or citations for three scholarly resources that you will use to support your ideas regarding your public health issue.
20 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Instructions
After reviewing the requirements in the final project document, explore the four focus areas identified by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
https://www.rwjf.org/en/our-focusareas.html?cid=xsh_rwjf_em
From these broad topics, identify a specific public health issue to use as the basis for your final project presentation. For example, if you are interested in mental health as a broad topic, you may narrow your focus and select healthcare for veterans as your specific topic. Using the Milestone One Template, begin to compile important information and resources that you can use to develop your presentation.21 Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare
NOTE: -THIS IS THE MAIN WORK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE. THE TOPIC IS COMPARING AVERAGE ANNUAL PERCENT OF DIABETIC MEDICARE ENROLLEES AGE 65-75 YEARS HAVING HEMOGLOBIN A1c BETWEEN MARYLAND AND VIRGINIA.
– I AM ALSO GOING TO SEND IN AN ATTACHEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT 1 & 2 SO YOU CAN HAVE A CLUE AS TO HOW TO GO ON WITH THIS WORK. THIS IS BASICALLY A GROUP WORK BUT THIS SECTION, WHICH SAYS STEP #3 IS MY PART.– I AM ALSO GOING TO SEND IN AN ATTACHMENT OF THE ENTIRE WORK INSTRUCTIONS BUT REMEMBER, THIS PART IS WHAT I NEED DONE WHICH IS THE QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS STEP #3.
– EXCELL IS THE STATISTICAL SOFTWEAR WE ARE GOING TO USE.
ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO ASK ME VIA MESSAGE. THANKS
TOPIC: Comparing Average Annual Percent of Diabetic Medicare Enrollees Age 65-75 Years Having
Hemoglobin A1c Between Maryland and VirginiaI. Quantitative Analysis
Step #3: Performing Quantitative data analysis design. This is very similar to Individual Assignments 1 and 2 (please look at the instructions for more details).
For this section:
3.1. Select one of the class data sets
3.2. Identify relevant variables
3.3. Indicate the statistical method you used for your analysis
3.4. Identify the statistical software your team used to run the statistical analysis focusing on EXCEL or RStudio (BONUS points) as the main software (you can use any other software such as SAS, STATA or SPSS, but the master-code will be available only for RStudio)
3.5. Analyze the data, state your conclusions and support them, this section should include:
3.5.1. Hypothesis or research questions with a short paragraph to discuss the issue.
3.5.2. Research Method for this section first report the table of variables, then define the variables using the example provided in step-by-step instruction.
3.5.3. Report the software and type of analysis you performed in this section including descriptive table and plots
3.5.4. Discuss your findings
3.5.5. Discussion: for this section, compare your finding with the LR (literature review) you performed in the first section
3.5.6. Recommendations: suggest a few policy recommendations based on your findings and LR.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!