CJMS 630 FINAL EXAM – Seminar in Security Management
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
The final exam must include this cover sheet with the student’s name and the date as well as the following statement: Honor Pledge
This exam is my own work. I received no assistance from any other individual, commercial entity, or unauthorized source.
Suspected violations of the academic integrity policy of the University of Maryland
University College will be processed in accordance to the Procedures for Handling
Charges of Alleged Academic Dishonesty outlined in Policy 150.25 – Academic
In typing my name following the word ‘Signature’, I intend that this certification will have the same authority and authenticity as a document executed with my hand-written signature.
Signature: [Insert your name here]
Date: [Insert date here]
3
CJMS 630 FINAL EXAM – Seminar in Security Management
Instructions:
1. Each question is worth 20 points. This exam is worth 25% of the final grade.
2. Each answer should be a minimum of 2 pages, double – spaced with one-inch margins. State your assumptions. Please do not repeat the question as a part of your answer; it’s not necessary.
3. Draw your answers from course readings, session notes (lectures), discussions, exercises and your personal insights. Students may use any academic resource and industry resources, so long as they are properly cited and referenced. Students cannot receive personal assistance from anyone.
This exam should be scanned using Turnitin.com. and the percentage should be included on the cover page.
Post your answers in the Assignment Folder on or before _ 11:59 pm (EST) , XXXXXXXX (Sunday Night). Do not submit WPS files – turn in only DOC files.
Question 1.
What elements would you include in providing a layered security system for a three-building corporate campus that includes a five-story building housing, which is the headquarters office for a major pharmaceutical company in the following scenario? (HINT – start by identifying what you believe are the critical assets and their locations and work from there . . .) (Assume that there have been “Moderate” threat’s made against this company – however not too specific- employees are worried, and executives somewhat cautious in their daily activities.) There have been major protests in and around the facility, however only a few arrests have been made.
The campus is located adjacent to a river that flows into Chesapeake Bay and sits on ground 8 feet above sea level. The building is in a suburban location, sited on approximately five acres adjacent to an interstate highway ramp. Parking is included within the campus boundary and approximately 750 employees are present daily, plus approximately 50 visitors. The loading docks can be accessed from the parking lot via side roads.
Building 1 contains the headquarters offices and is where all of the company’s executives work; all field administrative operations (human resources etc.) are coordinated from this building. Building 2 is where sensitive research is conducted (scientist, and research) and computer – information technology is coordinated. Building 3 has what may be considered as the overflow operations for the company; sensitive training (laboratories), conference rooms and storage. The computer room is in the basement of Building 2 essentially to provide a cool operating environment. The storage facilities hold equipment and supplies used to maintain the grounds.
See the map below for the company. Light poles are indicated by the “+” symbol.
Question 2.
Your security firm is hired to provide recommendations for crime prevention for a renovated three four story 50-year-old brick apartment buildings located in Detroit, Michigan. Each building has twenty apartments priced in the upper-middle class range. There is a fairly large overflow parking lot exposed to the city streets. Each apartment is afforded one parking slot in a garage under the building.
This apartment complex is part of a project to renovate the near downtown area and it is placed in an area where there is significant amount of crime about a quarter mile away. The adjacent streets have old businesses, some empty buildings, liquor store, a couple of bars and a popular corner café.
There will be a green landscaped buffer area that extends fifty yards all around the apartment complex to a new sidewalk; an exact landscape plan has not been furnished until you provide your ideas.
However, there are several large old oak trees and mature purple and white flowered lilac shrubbery that has been preserved on the campus kept from a portion of an old inner city park.
1. In your security plan what would you recommend in terms of crime prevention and target hardening security measures for this new residence complex?
2. Explain the security measures recommended in terms of critical assets considering likely threats, vulnerabilities, risks and crime theories.
3. Consider also what must be done prior to any recommendations being made.
4. Note your opinions, and what options may be available for the client to consider. E. What are your recommendations?
5. Describe an appropriate security and risk assessment for this scenario.
Question 3.
As a security consultant you are asked to review a recent armed robbery and rape case that happened on State University, USA, associated with the athletic complex. The crime happened at night when Doris Franklin finished her late work out for the gymnastic team. She showered and dressed and ready to leave she noticed the last evening bus left at 10 PM. She just missed it.
The janitor told her she would have to leave the building because he had to lock up the complex. She told him the bus had left and she did not want to walk back to the dorm in the dark and asked if she could call the campus police? He agreed and even stayed with her while she made a call to the campus police.
She called the campus police and asked for an escort. The campus police said they could have a campus security officer come by in about 20 minutes if she could wait. She agreed.
She told the janitor and he had her leave the building and wait immediately in front.
After 30 minutes Doris got tired of waiting so she started to walk back in the direction of the dorm when a car approached her, two males brandished a weapon, at gunpoint forced her into the car, stole her purse and she was later raped twice at another location. Fortunately, she was not killed, during the incident and was left severely hurt on the roadside.
The security officer showed up 35 minutes after the call and could not find her. He had stopped for a coffee at McDonald’s before coming. He left the athletic building never calling in the fact she had not been escorted. The procedure is that security must always report the outcome of escort service in terms of person, time of pick up, when the person was safely delivered to their dorm and mileage.
The campus police and security said they are not responsible since Doris chose to leave and not wait for the escort. The security officer was somewhat delayed arriving, however, he picked up his coffee at a drive-through window and had already missed his break since they were short a security officer.
What are the premise liability issues in this case? As a security consultant, what are your findings?
Question 4:
You are a newly appointed administrator of a large public school district that has been experiencing high crime rates among the student population, both on and around campus buildings and facilities. Thefts of property, vandalism and assaults are reported on a daily basis.
The local PTA is upset that the school district has not addressed these problems adequately in the past, and now it appears that these longstanding problems are out of control.
Recently, two students were shot in the hallway of the local high school during an altercation between two rival groups of gang members. Some students have reported observing drug transactions occurring in the bathrooms and in the parking lots, before, during, and after school hours.
Your job is to develop a short-term and long-term strategy to effectively deal with these problems. As with most public agencies, your school system is operating on a very limited budget, so you must choose your interventions wisely.
Assume that there are no programs in place to effectively deal with these problems, but the PTA wants answers now! According to the evidence, which programs work, and which programs do not appear to work? Which ones would you consider using?
Consider the pros and cons of whatever program/procedure you suggest or implement.
Question 5:
You are the appointed leader/supervisor of a group representing the office of a newly appointed Chief of Police for a large city experiencing high crime rates, which have been directly associated with gun violence on the street. (All of you are considered by the public as being police executives, and are equally responsible for the powers of the Chief of Police.) Street-level violence within the community has existed for years but the numbers of reported robberies, burglaries, murders, assaults, and theft have become increasingly prevalent in more recent times.
The mayor’s office and various members of the community are demanding “answers” because you were hired to help reduce these types of crimes based on your expertise in the policy-making process.
In order to make a difference in overall crime rates, you must address all serious issues relating to crime and its prevention. You have to address the crime problems mentioned above, but what does the research tell you?
Your job is to develop a short-term and long-term strategy to effectively deal with these problems. As with most localities, the various agencies working within your jurisdiction are operating under tight budgets, so you must choose your interventions wisely. Assume there are no programs in place to deal with the challenges that you are now facing. (You may want to consider what security tools you should, or may what to use in your evaluation.)
Due Date Nov 7, 2021 11:59 PM Hide Rubrics
Rubric Name: Assignment Rubric
Print Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group names in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method. You can give feedback on each criterion by tabbing to the add feedback buttons in the table. Criteria
Exceeds Expectations
Meets Expectations
Approaching Expectations
Below Expectations
Criterion Score
Content
20 points
Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in-depth analysis and evidence of original thought.
Main points are well developed with high quality and relevant resource support.
Student displayed exemplary critical thinking as evidenced by response to questions and support from relevant resources.
Points Possible: 18-20
17.9 points
Content indicates synthesis of ideas, analysis and evidence of original thought.
Main points are developed with quality and support from relevant resources.
Student displayed good critical thinking as evidenced by response to questions and support from relevant resources.
Points Possible: 16-17.9
15.9 points
Content indicates some development of ideas, analysis and evidence of original thought.
Main points contain some quality and are supported by some relevant resources.
Student displayed some critical thinking as evidenced by limited/incomplete response to questions and some support from relevant resources.
Points Possible: 14-15.9
13.9 points
Did not fulfil one or more requirements for this assignment.
Points available D: 12-13.9
Points available F: 0 -11.9
Score of Content,/ 20Criterion score has been overridden
Format/Grammar/Spelling/Timeliness
10 points
Student followed APA format correctly (Cover page, in text citations and reference page)
Student followed all format directions for this assignment
Student had no more than 1 grammar or spelling error
Student submitted assignment on time
Points available: 9-10
8.9 points
Student mostly used APA format correctly but does have one or more errors (Cover page, in text citations and reference page)
Student mostly followed all format directions for this assignment but has 1 or more errors.
Student submitted assignment on time
Points available: 8-8.9
7.9 points
Student did not follow APA format correctly and has more than one error (Cover page, in text citations and reference page)
Student mostly followed the format directions for this assignment but has more than 2 errors.
Student submitted assignment on time or within 2 days of the deadline passing
Points available: 7-7.9
6.9 points
Did not fulfill format/grammar/spelling/timeliness expectations for this assignment
Assignment was 5 or more days past due.
Points available D: 6-6.9
Points available F: 0-5.9
Score of Format/Grammar/Spelling/Timeliness,/ 10Criterion score has been overridden
Rubric Total ScoreTotal
Score of Assignment Rubric,/ 30Criterion score has been overridden
Overall Score
Overall Score
Exceeds Expectations – Equivalent to an A27 points minimum
Meets Expectations – Equivalent to an B24 points minimum
Approaching Expectations – Equivalent to an C21 points minimum
Below Expectations – Equivalent to a D or an F0 points minimum
Bottom of Form
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!