Children Mental Health Treatment Program Essay
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Children Mental Health Treatment Program Essay
Week Three Discussion
Student’s name
Instructor
Course
Date
Children Mental Health Treatment Program
Program goal
Mental health issues are recognized as a serious problem and a major public health concern. With mental health issues becoming more prevalent in the younger population, we must continue our efforts to bring awareness and fight against mental health disorders. Children’s mental health treatment program ensures children’s mental wellness is achieved. There are vital visionary goals under which the program operates with:
- Establishing a therapy environment that is centered on cooperation, respect, and acceptance.
- The treatment program provides required support and information to prevent complications of early childhood mental health development.
- Encouraging and supporting social wellness of the child and the family.
- Support the return to health development and behavior.
- Raise awareness and educate families with children at risk of developing mental health problems or social-emotional challenges.
- Provide the care and experiences that children need.
Evaluation question
Young people find a variety of hurdles to getting treatment for mental health issues. Stigma and shame are as difficulties recognizing symptoms (low mental health literacy) and a desire for self-reliance. Therefore, the research question for this discussion is, “how does the prevalence of stigma and shame in children with mental health problems affect the overall goal of children’s mental health treatment programs in developing solution-based approaches? This is a common topic in both qualitative and quantitative research.
Evidence
Mental illness is stigmatized in the public eye and in the minds of those who suffer from it. In the current study, stigma and embarrassment about getting assistance are the most significant obstacles to obtaining care for mental health problems in qualitative and quantitative investigations (Brown, 2020).
Data collection
For this research, stigma, embarrassment, mental interventions, and participants are key variables that the researcher needs to determine how they interdependently relate to each other to develop evidence-based mental interventions for children.
Adult Opiate Abuse Treatment
Program goal
There is a range of goals that adult opiate abuse treatment programs attempt to reduce the prevalence of opioid abuse, addiction, and misuse. For example, the program is driven by demands of reducing drug-associated health problems and social demand reduction and reducing violence and crimes associated with opioid use in the community (Carew & Comiskey, 2018). The program aims to educate and raise awareness the adults about the health complications associated with opioids, such as dependence, heart conditions, and respiratory problems, to discontinue their use.
Evaluation question
The research question guiding the researchers about opioid use, addiction, and overdose is to develop a communication strategy in the society that educates and raises awareness through social campaigns. As a result, the study seeks to understand the impact of increasing the use of social media technologies in amplifying public health messages concerning the prevention of opioid treatment.
Evidence
The intervention strategies of opioid use, misuse, and addiction should be reinforced with existing community resources and prevention messages that should be through digital technologies and other settings like homes, community organizations, and healthcare facilities (Choi et al., 2019). In addition, evidence demonstrates that opioid use should be regulated with established government policies, professional groups, and encourage through community organizations. The developed communication strategy helps set a navigating platform within the ongoing program.
Data collection
Data collection methods and analysis will be pre-tested with diverse targeted participants to maintain effectiveness before dissemination. Using questionnaires also, researchers will test messages collected from non-target participants when there is cause to think that this group will produce unintended adverse outcomes.
References
Brown, J. (2020). Engaging with parents in child and adolescent mental health services. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 41(2), 145-160.
Carew, A. M., & Comiskey, C. (2018). Treatment for opioid use and outcomes in older adults: a systematic literature review. Drug and alcohol dependence, 182, 48-57.
Choi, N. G., DiNitto, D. M., Marti, C. N., & Choi, B. Y. (2019). Adults who misuse opioids: Substance abuse treatment use and perceived treatment need. Substance abuse.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!