ANSWER TO THE QUESTION
The cases on the two coaches’ leadership styles focus on their delivery methods. While Coach K is an aggressive leader with his eyes on the goal, Coach Knight employs subtle delivery methods which entail interacting with his players at a personal level. Mike Krzyzweski is the head coach of the men’s basketball team at Duke University. He strives to engage his players personally by employing excellent communication and by positively reinforcing his players. Bobby Knight, a veteran of the military, heads basketball at the Indiana University where he utilized aggressive techniques to get his players to toe the line. He uses a strict regimen which entails thorough discipline, and he often intimidates his players. His tactics culminated in his dismissal from his position after physically mishandling a player yet he had been warned against excessively using force. On the other hand, Coach K’s exploits and excellent demeanor were recognized through his induction into the basketball hall of fame and a new lucrative contract for the national league.
Although they both seek success for their teams, the two coaches employ varied leadership styles. Coach K is inclusive and democratic. He builds interpersonal relationships with his players which he then exploits to create trust and harmony in the team. He enjoys a close bond with his players and he even invites them over for dinner at his place. Coach K believes in the use of motivation in leadership and he employs positive reinforcement and support with his players. He believes in the inherent capacity of human nature and the benefits of transactional leadership where players are rewarded for good deeds. The servant leadership employed by Coach K prompts him to guide, motivate and offer hope, and these are the key tenets of this form of leadership (Choudhary et al., 435). Coach Knight leads his players by placing them under willful duress and pressure. He has a burning desire to achieve, consequently, he uses excessive discipline to reprimand players who do not meet his expectations. The coach motivates his players by familiarizing them with the objective of the team, which is to win. Knight believes in coercive management due to his preference for harsh methods which include verbal insults and physical abuse.
Coach K is more effective than Coach Knight because is able to work with individuals from different backgrounds by using an encompassing level of intelligence to know and relate with his players at a personal level. His transformational leadership style is effective because it shows he genuinely cares for his players, consequently, they are bound to respect him. Additionally, the warm coach-player relationship motivates Coach K’s players to perform better as they believe that they are part of a cohesive unit. Transformational leadership entails a leader’s ability to inspire through individualized consideration (Choudhary et al., 434).
The leadership styles of the two coaches have a significant effect on the morale and organizational behavior of their players. The main goal of any organization is to foster a competitive advantage (Choudhary et al., 435). In a group setting as the basketball team, power and authority are interrelated with performance and meeting organizational goals. Coach K is more successful because he leads from within. Coach Knights players believe that they are constantly being watched and the transactional leadership style that is based on rewards and reprisals can have a negative impact on organizational behavior. When organizations are placed under a lot of pressure to perform, they can end up being unmotivated as they do not understand the objectives at hand, and this can be detrimental for organizational behavior.
TO RECEIVE THE REST OF THE PAPER IN THIS PROJECT, KINDLY GO TO www.perfectacademic.com. CLICK PLACE ORDER – FILL THE DETAILS OF THE ASSIGNMENT – COMPLETE PAYMENT PROCESSING
OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS WILL HAVE PAPER IN NO TIME!
Perfectacademic.com = A Grade paper + Timely Delivery By Our Professional Writers