Australian Surgery Indicator Makes the Front Page
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Case 15: Australian Surgery Indicator Makes the Front Page
The front page of the Sydney Morning Herald of February 28, 2011, carried an exclusive headlined, Thousands Hit as Hospitals Cancel Surgery (Wallace, 2011). It cited public records from NSW Health, the ministry responsible for monitoring New South Wales state health system. The records indicated that same-day surgery cancellations were occurring regularly at three times the accepted standard. Many patients showed up at public hospitals operated by area health services expecting to go into the operating room, only to be sent home after fasting and having blood samples sent to the lab. In many instances, surgeries were canceled because the hospitals did not have beds waiting for the patients after their surgeries.
The article noted that the ministrys Surgery Dashboard, a monthly snapshot of key performance indicators, sets a target of less than 2% for surgery cancellations. This is a stretch or aspirational goal, and some NSW hospitals were not meeting the previous standard of less than 5%.
The Surgical Service Taskforce developed the dashboard, and NSW Health incorporated it into its Pre-Procedure Preparation Toolkit, a guideline issued by the ministrys Health Service Performance Improvement Branch. Table 15-1 lists the key performance indicators for both state and local levels.
The guideline indicators and targets were reviewed in November 2012, and the canceled surgeries target remained unchanged.
The reporter interviewed the chair of the local Australian Medical Association hospital practice committee, who was also a medical school faculty member. He suggested that the problem was worse than indicated, because patients who wanted surgery but were never booked were not counted. He observed that the benchmark percentage was ambitious but clearly double or triple that figure is unacceptable. He called a ministry plan to add 400 public hospital beds per year insufficient.
The deputy director-general of NSW Health told the reporter that 4045% of the cancellations were for patient reasons, such as the patient not showing up or being ill on the day of surgery. He also noted that there were multiple reasons why hospitals could not accommodate surgery patientswhen trauma patients unexpectedly tied up ICU beds, for example, or when necessary supplies and equipment were not available. He noted that when the benchmark had been less than 5% nearly all the hospitals had met it, so it was raised to an aspirational level of less than 2% in 2007.
Data extracted from the monthly reports by the newspaper indicated that some hospitals were usually failing to meet the less than 5% target and few had come close to the less than 2% level on a consistent basis. The same-day cancellation rate for six of the nine local hospitals was around 4%. This suggests that almost 9,000 same-day surgeries are canceled in New South Wales each year. The deputy observed that a cancellation rate of 45% was typical of other Australian states and that 91% of elective surgeries were completed on time.
Table 15-1 Key Surgical Performance Indicators
State Level
Booked patient cancellations on the day of surgery for any reason < 2.0%
Patients canceled due to medical conditions (included above) < 1.0%
Suggested for Local Level
Patients through the preprocedure preparation process 100%
Percentage of patients processed by: Target locally determined
Telephone interview
General preadmission clinic
Multidisciplinary preadmission clinic
Average time spent by patient in preadmission clinic
General (anesthetist and nurse) 2 hours
Multidisciplinary 4 hours
Other
Patients who do not attend on the day of surgery < 0.5%
________________________________________
Source: Data from: NSW Department of Health, Guideline: Pre-Procedure Preparation Toolkit, Document GL-2007_018, 02-Nov-2007, p. 18. Accessed December 9, 2013, at www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies/gl/2007/pdf/GL2007_018.pdfReferenced
McLaughlin, C. P., & McLaughlin, C. D. (2014). Health policy analysis: An interdisciplinary approach (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!