Career Planning Based On Brain Dominance And Thinking Styles
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Career Planning Based On Brain Dominance And Thinking Styles
Assessment1 Self-Assessment
Complete the “Career Planning Based on Brain Dominance and Thinking Styles” self-inventory and consult the list of careers best suited to your primary thinking style. Then post a new thread to this discussion board that addresses the following:
- What were your scores in each of the four modes?
- Based on the numerical scores you received, what is your primary thinking style? What is your secondary preference?
- According to the self-assessment, what are the characteristics associated with your primary thinking style? Do you agree or disagree with these characteristics? Explain.
- What are some of the career choices suited to your thinking style? Would you be interested in pursuing any of these careers? Why or why not?
- Are there any careers listed for which you know you are not suited? Explain.
This posting, consisting of a minimum of 4 full paragraphs(at least 500), must include chapter ideas and concepts to support your answers. Please make certain to cite any outside sources used.
Example
Career Planning Based on Brain Dominance and Thinking Styles
My scores in each of the four modes were as follows:
Total points for A: 66 (primarily represent the left-brain mode)
Total points for B: 62 (primarily represent the right-brain mode)
Total points for C: 61 (primarily represent the right-brain mode)
Total points for D: 61 (primarily represent the left-brain mode)
Based on the numerical scores I received, my primary thinking style is A (left brain). Left brain thinkers are logical, use reasoning, serious, knowledgable, and organized. My secondary preference is B (right brain). Right brain thinkers are imaginative, creative, insightful, intuitive, humorous and playful.
According to the self-assessment, the characteristics associated with my primary thinking style are problem solving attributes of people who are characterized as analytical, logical, rational, and critical and who are talented in technical or quantitative areas. I would agree with this assessment. I love order and organization. I enjoy planning. Every January, my husband and I will hold a goals meeting and strategize all the items we want to acquire or accomplish for the year. At this time, we also assess what we accomplished last year and what we didn’t and find out why we didn’t and move that item to this year. We also assess our goals for 5 and 10 years. We also have a goals meeting with our kids and create story boards. They cut out pictures from magazines and paste them on poster board and write out what they want and how they are going to obtain it over the next year. They create SMART goals for themselves. I think this creates vision for them and helps to makes their individual goals more realistic.
Some of the career choices suited to my thinking style are personnel/ organizational, development, entrepreneurship, and marketing/advising. I am interested in all of these career choices and feel I have some experience in these areas with my current job. I enjoy writing business plans and creating action plans for what I want to accomplish for the year. I record monthly goals in a Day-Timer. I have a meeting with my managing broker each year to go over my career goals and do a last year assessment. We strategize what I can be doing better and what items are a waste of time and what things I can do to introduce into my business plan. Currently, I have a land project going on which requires tremendous planning and organizing.
There were a few careers listed that I would not be suited for. I don’t think I would enjoy library science or anything to do with arts and design. I have never been artistic with drawing or painting.
Assessment 2 Legal/Ethical Challenge assignment
Read the Chapter 6 Legal/Ethical Challenge “Should Companies Be Pressured to Recruit Females for Boards of Directors?” on p. 198-199.
Answer the question, “Where do you stand on this issue?” using the options included at the end of the assignment, in a 2-3 page essay (excluding cover page, attachments, etc.), double-spaced, using 12-point font and 1-inch margins. (at least 600words)_
Keep in mind that, while there are no “absolutely correct” answers for these questions, this is not an opportunity for opinion alone. Grading will reflect your reasoning and critical thinking skills, your ability to integrate what you have assimilated from material presented in the textbook and other learning materials, the clarity of your response and its appearance.
Please remember that, if your paper integrates information from published sources and/or you build on the work of others, you must be careful not to plagiarize. You can find information about plagiarism at the Plagiarism.org website; a link to this website has been provided under the “Resources” tab in the main menu of the course. Please also see the rubric posted under the “Resources” tab in the main menu of the course for additional guidelines on grading.
Assessment 3 M07
Leadership has many forms. Discuss the type of leader you work best with and discuss why you enjoy this type of leadership. Also discuss the type of leadership that you find hardest to work with. Discuss what type of leader you are. NOW….can leadership be taught or are you born with it? Defend your answers.
Your initial discussion should be at least 400words.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!