Business Network in Development Mode
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Business Network in Development Mode
Lab 2
Writing chaincode
V2.2
Introduction
Now that you have a running business network, you can write, install, and run smart contracts, called chaincode, to interacts with your blockchain. Chancode makes up your blockchain application and provides the only way for users to read from, and append to, the blockchain.
In this lab you’ll examine several chaincode files, run the sample chaincode presented in your textbook, and run tests on the chaincode to assess its functionality.
Lab Deliverables:
To complete this lab, you must create a Lab Report file and submit the file in iLearn. The Lab Report file must be a Microsoft Word format (.docx), and have the filename with the following format:
BLCN532_SECTION_STUDENTID_LASTNAME_FIRSTNAME_Lab02.docx
- SECTION is the section number of your current course (2 digits)
- STUDENTID is your student ID number (with leading zeros)
- LASTNAME is your last name
- FIRSTNAME is your first name
To get started, create a Microsoft Word document (.docx) with the correct filename for this lab. You’ll be asked to enter text and paste screenshots into the lab report file.
NOTE: All screenshots MUST be readable. Use the Ubuntu Screen Capture utility (see the lab video.) Make sure that you label each screenshot (i.e. Step 2.1.3) and provide screenshots in order. For commands that produce lots of output, I only want to see the last full screen when the command finishes. Provide FULL screenshots, NOT cropped images.
SECTION 1: Running chaincode
Step 1.1: Launch the sample trade network in development mode
First, you’ll start your sample business network in development mode (note the ‘-d’ option).
- Open PowerShell
- PS %HOME%> cd vagrant\hyperledger
- PS %HOME%\vagrant\Hyperledger> vagrant up
- Login to your Linux VM (userid: vagrant password: vagrant) and open a Terminal window.
- $ cd $GOPATH/src/trade-finance-logistics/network
- $ ./trade.sh up -d true
- $ date
- Create a screenshot of the results of steps 5 – 7 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
Step 1.2: Compile the chaincode
Next, you’ll use a different PuTTY connection to compile and run the chaincode.
- Open a new Terminal window.
NOTE: This is the SECOND Terminal CONNECTION for screenshots in later steps.
- $ cd $GOPATH/src/trade-finance-logistics/network
- $ docker exec -it chaincode bash
NOTE: If you get an error in step 3, go to your other Terminal app, shutdown the trade network, then re-start it.
- # cd trade_workflow_v1 (Note the new prompt)
- # go build
Step 1.3: Run the chaincode
Now you can run the chaincode you just compiled.
- # export CORE_PEER_ADDRESS=peer:7052
- # export CORE_CHAINCODE_ID_NAME=tw:0
- # ./trade_workflow_v1 (This is a server process, so you won’t get a prompt back.)
Step 1.4: Install and run the chaincode on the channel
- Open a New (3rd) Terminal window.
- $ cd $GOPATH/src/trade-finance-logistics/network
- $ docker exec -it cli bash
- # peer chaincode install -p chaincodedev/chaincode/trade_workflow_v1 -n tw -v 0
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 4 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- # peer chaincode instantiate -n tw -v 0 -c ‘{“Args”: [“init”,”LumberInc”,”LumberBank”,”100000″,”Wooden Toys”,”ToyBank”,”200000″,”Universal Freight”,”ForestryDepartment”]}’ -C tradechannel
- # peer chaincode invoke -n tw -c ‘{“Args”: [“requestTrade”,”trade-12”,”50000″,”Wood for Toys”]}’ -C tradechannel
NOTE: the command in step 7 doesn’t copy-paste well. You’ll just have to type it.
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 7 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- # peer chaincode invoke -n tw -c ‘{“Args”: [“getTradeStatus”,”trade-12″]}’ -C tradechannel
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 9 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- In the SECOND Terminal window (the one you opened in step 1.2), create a screenshot of the results of step 9 and paste that screenshot into your Lab Report File.
SECTION 2: Reviewing chaincode source code
Step 2.1:
- Open a New Terminal window.
- $ cd $GOPATH/src/trade-finance-logistics/chaincode/src/github.com/trade_workflow_v1
- $ gedit tradeWorkflow.go
- Follow the source code development process in the textbook, starting with the “Creating a chaincode” section.
- Find the Invoke() method in the editor. (Make sure the line starts with “func”.)
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 5 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- Find the requestTrade() method in the editor. (Make sure the line starts with “func”.)
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 7 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- Find the getTradeStatus() method in the editor. (Make sure the line starts with “func”.) You invoked this method in the previous section (Step 1.4.9).
- Scroll down to the end of the getTradeStatus() method. You should see the string “Query Response:” in the next-to-last line in the method. This is the code that prints the trade status.
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of step 10 and paste it into your Lab Report File.
- Exit gedit
Section 3: Testing chaincode
Step 3.1: Test the chaincode
- $ cd $GOPATH/src/trade-finance-logistics/chaincode/src/github.com/trade_workflow_v1
- $ gedit tradeWorkflow_test.go
- Find the method that tests ShipmentInitiation.
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) that shows the other methods (should be 7) the current method invokes to test its functionality. (You can find this information in a program comment. Comments start with two forward slashes. Look for lines that start with “//”.) Paste that screenshot into your Lab Report File.
- Exit gedit
- $ go test
- $ date
- Create a screenshot (in the current Terminal window) of the results of steps 6 and 7 and paste that screenshot into your Lab Report File.
Section 4: Wrapping up
Now that you have compiled, installed, run, and tested your chaincode, you need to properly shutdown your business network.
- Press CTRL-C in the SECOND Terminal window to return to the # prompt.
- Type exit at the # prompt (in all Terminal windows except the first one) to exit docker.
- $ ./trade.sh down -d true
- Exit from your Linux sessions
- $ exit
- In Windows PowerShell, shut down your Hyperledger virtual machine:
- PS %HOME%\vagrant\Hyperledger> vagrant halt
- Create a snapshot (NOT A SCREENSHOT) of your Ubuntu VM in VirtualBox. This allows you to easily restore to this point if you ever need to “undo” subsequent steps and return to a known point.
- PS %HOME%\vagrant\Hyperledger> vagrant snapshot save EndOfLab02
You should have 10 screenshots in your Lab Report File. Save your file and submit it in iLearn as a file attachment for the Lab 2 assignment.
Congratulations! You have complete lab 2.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!