BUSI 770 Strategic Thinking in Decision Making Essay

BUSI 770 Strategic Thinking in Decision Making Essay

Description/Paper Instructions

BUSI 770 Strategic Thinking in Decision Making Essay

BUSI 770, Strategic, Thinking, Decision, Making, Essay

Overview A critical skill at the doctoral level is the ability to conduct scholarly research guided by clearly articulated questions that address a specific issue or problem. For this literature review, your research will be guided by the following three Research Questions:

1. How do individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making?
2. What are the newest directions in the process of strategy development and execution?
3. How can my academic discipline, as a function within the organization, impact the process of business strategy development and execution? The first two questions are explored from a broad business perspective, while the third question gives you the opportunity to change your frame of reference to your specific business specialization.

The purpose of this research project is for you to create a scholarly piece of doctoral level research and writing which conforms to current APA format. Competency in the current APA format is required of all Business graduates of Liberty University, as set forth by policy of both the Graduate Faculty and the Administration.

What are we looking for in this literature review? A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area and sometimes information in a particular subject area within a certain time period. This literature review will be more than just a simple summary of information from various sources as it will include an organizational pattern that combines both a summary and synthesis of information.

Please keep in mind that a summary is a re-encapsulation of the important information found in the source, while a synthesis is a re-organization and combining of that information to present a more complete picture. Finally, the literature review will evaluate the sources and advise the reader of the most pertinent or relevant points.

Are there differneces between between plagiarism, paraphrasing, and quoting? Paraphrasing is when you take a source or someone else’s idea and say it in your own words or even combine the ideas of several authors as well as your own. When you paraphrase, you will still give the author credit through the use of an in-text citation connected to the idea as well as a reference at the end of the paper.

On the other hand, a direct quote from a source has quotation marks around the quote or if 40 words or more, it must be set in block quotation format. You can refer to the APA guide for more information on this. Plagiarism is when the writer simply copies the words directly from the source without giving credit with an in-text citation and a reference. Plagiarism is not permitted.

BUSI 770 Literature Review Instructions Liberty University School of Business

30 Apr 2018 Page 2 of 3

At the doctoral level, you should be relying almost exclusively on the use of paraphrasing to allow synthesis of the original author’s views with your own. A direct quotation should only be used in this literature review (or most other documents you will produce) when paraphrasing would change the author’s intended meaning. In other words, you should only use a quotation when it is the only way to convey what the author intended to convey.

Literature Review Outline Instructions: Your outline will include a minimum of 2 levels of indentation below each Research Question. Introduction Level 1 – RQ1 Level 2 – Sub heading 1 Level 2 – Sub heading 2 Etc. Level 1 – RQ2 Level 2 – Sub heading 1 Level 2 – Sub heading 2 Etc. Level 1 – RQ3 Level 2 – Sub heading 1 Level 2 – Sub heading 2 Etc. Conclusion This is a scholarly document and must be submitted in APA format.

You must paste your text directly into the message window in Blackboard and attach a word document (.docx). Literature Review Outline – Due Sunday of Week 6 by 11:59pm (Eastern Time) Literature Review Instructions:

• Follow the outline generated in Week 6 updated to include any feedback from your

instructor.

• Minimum of 24 pages not including introduction and conclusion
• No less than 8 pages addressing each research question
• Minimum of 18 sources not including course texts
• No less than 6 sources for each research question
• 1 inch margins, Double Spaced, Maximum of 12 point font
• APA 6th ed. Format to include APA Cover Page, Abstract, Table of Contents, and

Reference Section

BUSI 770 Literature Review Instructions Liberty University School of Business

30 Apr 2018 Page 3 of 3

You will have an opportunity to submit your Literature Review to SafeAssign for evaluation. A matching score of more than 20% in the content area of the paper will not receive a passing grade. A well written and properly paraphrased Literature Review should score 10% or below.

Keep in mind that it is expected that headings and references will be the same so they are not included in the content that is evaluated. Note: The SafeAssign evaluation process can take up to 24 hours so plan that into your schedule! You must paste your text directly into the message window in Blackboard and attach a word document (.docx). Literature Review – Due Friday of Week 8 by 11:59pm (Eastern Time)

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!