BUS407 Week 10 Scenario Script: Conclusion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages To Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
- Assess the benefits of two types of development activities that would affect employee performance within a management training program.
- From the scenario, determine two effects of employee development.
BUS407 Week 10 Scenario Script: Conclusion
Slide # Scene/Interaction Narration Slide 1 Scene 1 / Deborah’s Office (Talking to the student)
Deborah: Hello!
The training session will start in fifteen minutes. I know it’s going to have a huge impact on Taormina’s call center. And it has been a great experience for us, hasn’t it?
Before you begin the training session, let’s take the time to review all the steps that helped you to develop this training.
Slide 2 Interactive Slide This slide will include 9 buttons that the students can click on to review each of the steps. Each step will cover topics covered in one week of the scenarios.
Step 1: First, you identified the problem affecting the expected performance gap. You performed a basic needs analysis and considered performance needs.
Then, you analyzed trigger events and performance gaps.
Step 2: Second, you identified specific strategies to improve Taormina’ sales performance. Taormina needs to improve its sales performance immediately. Because of this, you decided to adopt a reactive strategy approach to solve the organizational performance gap.
Step 3: Third, you reviewed the various parts of the performance model through an internal scanning process. Then, you decided to use the expectancy theory.
Step 4: Fourth, you reviewed common training topics for Taormina’s call center. Then, you conducted a person analysis to discover possible elements causing the employees’ lack of performance.
Step 5: Fifth, you defined the training objective paying attention to the desired outcome, the conditions, and the standards. Then, you had a great idea about the name of our training: Calling for Effective Communication.
Step 6: Sixth, you projected the most effective course of action. You proposed a lecture/discussion method. Using this method, we were able to control our cost, while providing interactive group discussions activities.
Step 7: Seventh, you worked through the development and implementation phases of our training program using the Experiential Learning Model.
Step 8: Eighth, you assessed the importance of evaluating training programs and reviewed the steps of the evaluation process. These steps were reaction, learning, job behaviors, and organizational results.
Step 9: Lastly, you reviewed the five key areas of organizational training. These areas are orientation training, diversity training, sexual harassment training, team training, and cross-cultural training.
Slide 3 Scene 2 / Deborah’s Office (Talking to the student)
Deborah: You are definitely a valuable asset on our team…great job! It was difficult work, but you pulled it all together. During the past ten weeks, you have been working very hard and proving your expertise. Kudos to you!
But I have a final challenge for you. Which element do you consider to be the most important when designing a training opportunity?
Slide 4 Test your Knowledge
This will be in the form of a multiple choice interaction slide with narrated feedback.
Which element do you consider to be the most important when designing a training opportunity?
Determining trigger events: Correct! Assessing the tangible or intangible barriers and occurrences that are causing another event to occur will help us in designing the right training opportunity.
Budgeting: Incorrect! Calculating our budget is important when planning the training. However, there are a variety of methods, strategies, and tools available to adjust our budget effectively.
Training Objectives: Incorrect! We need to know what issue to address before we can design a specific objective.
Evaluation Process: Incorrect! The evaluation process is the last phase of any training effort.
Determining trigger events: Correct! Assessing the tangible or intangible barriers and occurrences that are causing another event to occur will help us in designing the right training opportunity.
Budgeting: Incorrect! Calculating our budget is important when planning the training. However, there are a variety of methods, strategies, and tools available to adjust our budget effectively.
Training Objectives: Incorrect! We need to know what issue to address before we can design a specific objective.
Evaluation Process: Incorrect! The evaluation process is the last phase of any training effort.
Slide 5 Scene 3/ Deborah’s office
Deborah: Great job!
This was your last challenge, and I had total confidence in you. You are familiar with all of the steps in the training process model. And now you have a complete understanding of how to create effective training. I’m very proud of you.
I wanted you to know, I’m moving on with my career. I’ve spoken to senior management about the fantastic work you’ve done on this project for Taormina. They have decided to give you a promotion based on my recommendation. You have been promoted to Taormina’s Director of Training and Development. This was a well-deserved promotion, and I know you’ll do well.
Before you start your new position, make sure to finish up any loose ends. This includes discussions and assignments, as well as e-activities.
Bye for now and good luck with the training session…
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. The can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!