Big Data Analytics Case Study Discussion
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Big Data Analytics Case Study Discussion
Subject: Big Data Analytics
Q1. Please read the below paragraph and write your opinion. You have any suggestions?
Note: 100 words with intext citation and references please.
Technological advances have led to the generation of huge amounts of data that has to the creation of big data concepts to define large amounts of data that is unmanageable. For meeting future as well as present social needs such as healthcare provision new approaches for the data organization to get meaningful information is necessary (Pries & Dunnigan, 2016). The ability to detect patterns and transform big volumes of data into actionable information for decision-making is needed. Big data is currently being used in healthcare to provide solutions.
Big data analysis is complex because it requires a combination of electronically captured information. Unstructured data does not have a predefined structure such as audio files, images, and video recordings are unorganized that require more processing. The data is also challenging in searching for it and indexing by first establishing its relevance which is also difficult (Sharda et al., 2017). Data can be used to predict both current and future trends.
Some of the questions that can be helpful in data collection from the patients can be;
- What medical history do you have?
- What medications do you take both prescription and non-prescription?
- What is your history of alcohol and smoking history?
Q2. Please read the below paragraph and write your opinion. You have any suggestions? Note: 100 words with intext citation and references please.
The terms ’unstructured’, ‘semi-structured’, and ‘structured’ often come up when discussing about data analytics. Structured data is data that has been transformed into an understandable format, usually by following a nicely defined data model. The data model is able to map raw data into pre-defined fields. SQL databases, with all the rows and columns, is a great example of structured data.
Structured data is oftentimes quantifiable. Semi-structured data is somewhere between structured data and unstructured data. It has some consistent characteristics, but it doesn’t have enough rigidity to fit into a relational data model. We can attach organizational properties to semi-structured data to make it more manageable.
Unstructured data is data that shows up in its raw, unprocessed form. Qualitative data represents a good portion of the unstructured data. These data typically is hard to organize into pre-defined data models. NoSQL databases are more suited to manage unstructured data.
In the context of the DIKW model, structured data & unstructured data need to come together in order to be extracted into useful information. In the case of a healthcare clinic, both quantitative data and qualitative data can come in handy. The unstructured, qualitative data is equally important for diagnosing as quantitative health measurements, if not more.
Not everything about a person’s health condition is quantifiable, otherwise doctor’s jobs would become extinct. A doctor’s brain is like a supercomputer, it automatically processes any unstructured data, and then turns it into descriptive information, then extracts it into useable knowledge, and eventually into forward-looking wisdom.
Subject: Internship
Q3. Please read the below paragraph and write your opinion.
Note: 100 words with intext citation and references please.
The company I work for was originated in China and only started doing business in US since recent years. It is a different perspective than the companies that were exposed to diversity environment since foundation. Increase diversity and have team mebers from differnt background is benefitial for a healthy work environment is something my employer is reaching for. The most common challenges we face with diversity is the language barrier. Most of our teams are located in China and a large portion of our clients speaks very little English. Many documentations are only available in Chinese as well. Thus any new recruit we hire, we would have to pair them with someone who speaks Chinese, and they are getting their trainning from this person while all the documents are being translated as we use them. This is very challenging to both the Chinese team members and the recruits who don’t speak Chinese. We use a lot of automatic translations to address the communication, yet there are still meetings hosted by engineers who don’t speak English at all. My company is trying to approach this method by hiring more people who speaks English and with in-depth background with the technology we use. Also we are inviting all the team members to produce more documentation translations so we can help new recruits who don’t speak Chinese. It is slow but a moving progress, and my employer feel optimistic about future diversity.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!