Autonomous weapon human-machine interaction trust
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
Autonomous weapon human-machine interaction trust
Autonomous weapons, also known as lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), are a rapidly developing technology that raises significant ethical and legal concerns. One of the key issues related to the use of autonomous weapons is accountability. Accountability refers to the ability to identify and hold responsible the individuals or entities responsible for the actions of a system. This is especially important in the context of autonomous weapons, as these systems are capable of making life-or-death decisions without human intervention.
Human-machine interaction is a key aspect of accountability in autonomous weapons systems. This refers to the way in which humans and machines interact and communicate with one another. In the context of autonomous weapons, this includes the ways in which humans can control, monitor, and override the actions of the system. It also includes the ways in which the system can provide information to the human operator, such as the reasoning behind its actions.
One of the challenges of human-machine interaction in autonomous weapons systems is ensuring that the system is transparent and understandable to the human operator. This is important in order to ensure that the operator can make informed decisions about when to override the system, and to provide the operator with a clear understanding of the system’s actions.
Another important aspect of human-machine interaction in autonomous weapons systems is the ability to ensure that the system is following the rules of engagement. The rules of engagement are the guidelines that govern the use of force in a military context. They are designed to ensure that the use of force is proportional, discriminate, and consistent with the principles of distinction and military necessity. The ability to ensure that an autonomous weapon is following the rules of engagement is essential in order to maintain accountability for its actions.
One way to ensure accountability for the actions of autonomous weapons is through the use of a human-in-the-loop system. This refers to a system in which a human operator is able to monitor and override the actions of the autonomous weapon. This can be achieved through the use of a remote operator, or through the use of a human operator on-board the weapon. The human operator is able to make decisions about when to override the system, and to provide the system with additional information or instructions.
Another approach to ensuring accountability for the actions of autonomous weapons is through the use of a human-on-the-loop system. This refers to a system in which a human operator is able to monitor the actions of the autonomous weapon, but is not able to override its decisions. This approach is often used in situations where the autonomous weapon is operating in a highly dynamic environment, and the human operator is not able to react quickly enough to override the system.
In conclusion, accountability is a critical issue in the development and use of autonomous weapons. Human-machine interaction is a key aspect of accountability, and it is important to ensure that the system is transparent and understandable to the human operator, and that the system is following the rules of engagement. Ensuring accountability for the actions of autonomous weapons will be an ongoing challenge as the technology continues to evolve. The development of these technologies must be accompanied by a robust ethical and legal framework to minimize the risk of unintended consequences and ensure compliance with international humanitarian law.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
Autonomous weapon human-machine interaction trust
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!