Autonomous weapon development

January 14, 2023

Autonomous weapon development

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

Autonomous weapon development

Autonomous weapons, also known as killer robots or lethal autonomous weapon systems (LAWS), are weapons that can select and engage targets without human intervention. These weapons are currently being developed by a number of countries and organizations, and have the potential to revolutionize warfare by increasing the speed and precision of engagements and reducing the risk to human soldiers. However, there are also significant concerns about the ethical and moral implications of these weapons, as well as the potential for unintended consequences and loss of control.

One of the key benefits of autonomous weapons is their ability to increase the speed and precision of engagements. With traditional weapons, human operators must select and engage targets, which can be a slow and imprecise process. Autonomous weapons, on the other hand, can select and engage targets in real-time, using advanced sensors and algorithms to identify and track targets. This can greatly increase the effectiveness of military operations, and reduce the risk to human soldiers.

Another benefit of autonomous weapons is the ability to operate in environments that are too dangerous or difficult for humans. For example, autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) can be used to search for and disarm underwater mines, and autonomous aerial vehicles (UAVs) can be used for reconnaissance and surveillance in areas with poor visibility or heavy enemy fire. These weapons can also be used in space and cyberspace, which are increasingly becoming key domains for military operations.

There are also concerns about the ethical and moral implications of autonomous weapons. One major concern is the potential for these weapons to be used to violate international humanitarian law (IHL) and human rights. For example, autonomous weapons may not be able to distinguish between civilian and military targets, or may be used to carry out extrajudicial killings. Additionally, there are concerns about accountability and responsibility, as it is unclear who would be held responsible if an autonomous weapon causes harm or damage.

Another concern is the potential for unintended consequences and loss of control. Autonomous weapons are highly complex systems that rely on advanced algorithms and artificial intelligence (AI) to make decisions. However, there is always the risk of these systems malfunctioning or being hacked, which could result in unintended or harmful actions. Additionally, there is the risk that autonomous weapons could be used in ways that were not intended by their creators, such as for cyber warfare or to target civilians.

There are also concerns about the arms race and destabilization that may result from the development and deployment of autonomous weapons. As more and more countries and organizations develop and deploy these weapons, there is the risk that they will be used in conflicts, escalating tensions and leading to an arms race. Additionally, the deployment of autonomous weapons could lead to a shift in the balance of power, with countries or organizations that have these weapons having a significant advantage over those that do not.

In conclusion, autonomous weapons have the potential to revolutionize warfare by increasing the speed and precision of engagements and reducing the risk to human soldiers. However, there are also significant concerns about the ethical and moral implications of these weapons, as well as the potential for unintended consequences and loss of control. It is important for countries and organizations to consider these issues carefully, and to work towards the development and deployment of autonomous weapons in a responsible and ethical manner.

Artificial intelligence (AI) weapons have the potential to revolutionize warfare, but they also raise significant ethical and safety concerns. Transparency is crucial in addressing these concerns, as it allows for greater oversight and accountability of AI weapon systems.

One of the main concerns with AI weapons is the potential for unintended consequences. Autonomous weapons systems, in particular, can make decisions without human input, which raises the risk of the system malfunctioning or making decisions that lead to unintended harm. Transparency in the development and deployment of AI weapons can help mitigate this risk by allowing for greater oversight of the system’s decision-making process. This can be achieved through the use of explainable AI, which allows for the system’s decisions to be traced back to the input data and the reasoning behind the decision.

Another concern is the potential for AI weapons to be used in a discriminatory or biased manner. AI systems can inadvertently perpetuate bias if they are trained on biased data, which can lead to unfair or unjust outcomes. Transparency in the data used to train and test the system can help detect and prevent such bias.

Transparency can also help ensure compliance with international law and regulations. The use of autonomous weapons systems raises questions about responsibility and accountability in the event of a malfunction or unintended harm. Transparency can help establish clear lines of responsibility and accountability, and ensure that the use of AI weapons complies with international law and regulations.

Transparency can also be beneficial for public trust and acceptance of AI weapons. The public may have concerns about the use of AI weapons, and transparency can help address these concerns by providing information about the system’s capabilities and limitations.

In conclusion, transparency is crucial in addressing the ethical and safety concerns raised by AI weapons. Transparency in the development, deployment, and use of AI weapons can help ensure compliance with international law and regulations, mitigate the risk of unintended consequences, and promote public trust and acceptance. It is important to develop transparency measures that provide oversight and accountability while also protecting sensitive information

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE	NO RESPONSE	POOR / UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.	30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.	40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.	50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).	Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.	5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.	10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.	15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.	20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors	10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors	15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.	20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever.	5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper	7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.	10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!