Astin Martin Electronics LLC Case Study
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Business Project Management
Software Project Team (YOU): JBB Software
Customer: Astin Martin Electronics LLC
RFP awarded for specific
messageservices which will be incorporated into an electronic instrument company (Astin Martin Electronics LLC) interface to electronic gauges. Topical level requirements for the software were provided. Deliverable products include:
– Systems Engineering to provide appropriate requirements decomposition
-Software Engineering to provide design/development/unit test of software
-System Test Engineering to provide component and enterprise level testing
-Quality Engineering to provide quality control through the entire development life cycle
-Management functions to include all primary functions (project management,
finance, planning & scheduling, Overhead support (contracts, engineering matrix,
etc.) Award date of May 15 and required completion date (deliverables provided)
of November 15.Astin Martin Electronics request of planned deliverables, acceptance criteria, quality plan, and work breakdown structure. These items need to be provided in an acceptable time for Astin Martin to review and approve. Astin Martin Electronics further requests other deliverables to include final software
(source and binary) which meets all approved acceptance criteria, associated design documents (system and development level) All project questions or request for project scope changes should be directed to the Astin Martin
Electronics designee (course instructor). There is no requirement relative to project tools used to generate the required data. Topical requirementsinclude:
-System Engineering: UML design artifacts for graphic widgets to display
aeronautical expanse gauges for interface testing within the technical specs
guidelines for twenty
-five different visual aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review. Design should include graphical mock-up of gauges.
4-System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software
Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System
and Enterprise level testing-Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System
Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review.
– Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the
software which meets all topical and derived requirements
-System Test Engineering: Derive sell
-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate
peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval.
-System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases.
Include appropriate level of peer review.
-System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become
available-Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks during the processes described for
System Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as
appropriate
-Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System
Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Astin
Martin Electronics acceptance of software), and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed) Approved labor rates as follows:-System Engineer I: 41.15
-System Engineer II: 47.37
-System Engineer III: 51.17-Lead System Engineer: 56.91
-Software Engineer I: 42.38
-Software Engineer II: 47.62
-Software Engineer III: 51.01-Lead Software Engineer: 58.83
-System Test Engineer I: 41.78
-System Test Engineer II: 43.62
-System Test Engineer III: 49.25
-Lead System Test Engineer: 55.25
-Quality Engineer I: 40.38-
Quality Engineer II: 47.55
-Quality Engineer III: 52.01
-Lead Quality Engineer: 59.83
-Project Manager: 91.55
(LOE–Level of Effort)-Chief Engineer: 75.41 (LOE–Level of Effort)
Approved overhead rates as follows:
-Finance:6.2% of total hours
-Planning & Scheduling:5.5% of total hours5
-Management (Contracts/Senior Management): 2.1% of total hours
-Facility: 1.2% of total hours
-HR/Staffing: 0.55% of total hours
ACTIVITY / TASK LIST BY LOWEST WBS LEVEL LEG
2.1Systems Engineering
: UML Design for Interface System Engineering: Create outline of UML and derived requirements artifacts. Software Engineering: Assist system engineering. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks 2.2
Systems Engineering: System/Software Design System Engineering: Design appropriate software components to display aeronautical expanse gauges within the technical specs guidelines for twenty – five different visual
aspects. Include appropriate level of peer review. Software Engineering: Assist system engineering. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks. 2.3
Systems Engineering: Approve design System Engineering: Derive component level requirements for Software Engineering to design, code, and unit test and System Test can provide System and Enterprise level testing. Software Engineering: Assist system engineering System Test Engineering: Derive sell-off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks. 3. 1 Software Engineering: Approve Content S/W Component Design
System Engineering: Assist software engineering Software Engineering: Provide appropriate level design artifacts from System Engineering UML design artifacts. Include appropriate level of peer review. System Test Engineering: Derive sell – off acceptance criteria. Include appropriate peer review (including System Engineering) and customer approval. 6 Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks. 3. 2 Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test System Engineering: Assist software engineering Software Engineering: Code and Unit Test software modules that execute the software which meets all topical and derived requirements. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.3.3 Software Engineering: Function Test (with actual gauges) System Engineering: Assist software engineering Software Engineering: Check the function Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks. 4.1 Test Engineering: Design Test Artifacts System Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion Software Engineering: Support with other engineers for opinion
System Test Engineering: Derive System and Enterprise Level Test Cases. Include appropriate level of peer review. Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
4.2 Test Engineering: Perform Environment Level Tests System Engineering:
Support with other engineers for opinion Software Engineering: Support
with other engineers for opinion System Test Engineering: Execute test cases as software modules become available Quality Engineering: Provide quality checks.
4.3 Test Engineering: Approve Test Services (with Customer Acceptance Criteria)
System Test Engineering: Assist Quality EngineeringQuality Engineering: Quality checks during the processes described for System
Engineering, Software Engineering, and System Test Engineering as appropriate
7 Include the following customer related reviews: Design Review (after System
Engineering completes design artifacts), Pre-Ship Review (provided prior to Astin Martin Electronics acceptance of software).
4.4 Test Engineering: Run Test on Live Environment (Customer Facility)
System Test Engineering: Assist Quality engineering
Quality Engineering: quality checks, and Final Acceptance Test (software demonstration at customer facility showing software meets all requirements as installed) installed)4.5 System Test Engineering: Deploy to Operational Environment (Customer Facility) System Test Engineering: work with customer facility team for full deployment Use approved installation instructions to deploy software into operational environment with support from customer facility team
*** Add more WBS activities as required or you deem necessary ***
Example: May want to add WBS level for Quality Engineering for derived tasks or those tasks could be incorporated in the WBS items noted above.
NOTIONAL
ACTIVITY DURATION
SCHEDULE
NotionalActivity estimated Duration
The estimated total elapsed time for how long an activity will take from starts
to finish, including associated waiting time. Also referred to as activity
resource estimated or
estimated activity resources.
Example only:
Does not reflect tasks of this assignment.
8PROJECT QUESTIONS & TASKS
1. Provide a project objective associated with the Astin Martin Electronics project. Include a list of assumptions about the project.
2. What is a work breakdown structure? What is a responsibility matrix?
Using the Astin Martin Astin Martin Electronics project activity list and activity duration schedule, reate a WBS and RAM. Work Breakdown Structure (Should provide hierarchical graph)
???
Responsibility Assignment Matrix
???
(Example
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!