Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan

NSG4029 Leadership in a Diverse Society Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan Instructions and Assignment Details

Introduction: Complete the Leadership Assessment Tools. Analyze the data from these tools. Develop plan for self-improvement per the instructions.

Mind Tools: https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newLDR_50.htm

MACH-IV: https://openpsychometrics.org/tests/MACH-IV/

Objectives

1. Analyze leadership concepts, skills and decision-making strategies in professional practice.
2. Compare and contrast leadership and management.
3. Discuss the influence of nursing leadership styles on decision-making.

4. Identify nursing leadership strategies regarding effective commination, conflict management, negotiations, delegation, supervision, and utilization of staff.

Reading and Resources Necessary for the Assignment

Porter-O’Grady, T. & Malloch, K. (2016). Leadership in nursing practice. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Read chapter 1 and 2.

Instructions

1. Read the Assigned readings.
2. Complete the assigned leadership assessment tools.
3. Develop a short paper suing the criteria listed below.

4. Submit to the Assignment to Week 2 area: Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan by the posted due date.

Assignment Content Parts – See Template

1. Content Area 1: APA Cover

2. Content Area 2: APA Introduction
   1. Include a 3 sentences including the purpose statement of the assignment.
3. Content Area 3: Summary of Self-Assessment Tool Results
   1. Complete the tools the self-assessment tool results.
   2. In paragraph form, summarize the results.
4. Content Area 4: Analysis and Reelection

1. After reflecting on the results of the assessment tools, identify two area of leadership you would like to grow and develop that will enhance your professional nursing practice.
2. Explain how these two areas will support your professional development.

1. Consider how your personal and professional experiences have influenced the development of your leadership skills and abilities.

5. Content Area 5: Evidence-Based Leadership Plan

1. Describe at least one evidence-based strategies to improve each area of leadership described in your paper.

6. Content Area 6: Conclusion
   1. Include a 3-4 sentences summarizing the major points and purpose of the paper.
7. Content Area 7: References

1. All references must be listed on a new page and in alphabetical order by author last name. All references listed must be cited.

Submit: Submit approximately 2 pages of content in paragraph format plus one APA cover page and one page of APA references. Use Level 1 and Level 2 APA headings to demonstrate organization.

1. Papers longer than 3 pages of content will not be graded after the end of page 3.

2. The completed assignment must include an APA title page. References must start on a new page, the final page of the assignment. Two references are required. Do not cite or reference the assigned assessment tools.

3. Upload the completed assignment to the BrightSpace in Microsoft Word by the due date.

4. You may be required to submit the actual sources or articles used as references or submit the assignment for plagiarism detection such as turnitin.com.

Grading: Each assignment will be graded per the syllabus using the following rubric:

Assignment Grading Rubric

Assignment 1 Leadership Assessment and Improvement Plan

Today, leadership assessment plays a critical role in the formulation of a leadership development plan. This is because it enables a corporation to appraise the aptitudes of its managers in different positions and their efforts to lead teams and projects. Furthermore, leadership assessment helps in guiding the career goals of organizational leaders. Consequently, this promotes the performance of such leaders in the organization, which also promotes the overall success of an organization. The Machiavellian Personality Test (MACH-IV) and the Mind Tools assessment framework are highly effective leadership assessment tools that can be employed to promote the leadership skills of nursing leaders in the healthcare profession.

Summary of Self-Assessment Tool Results

The Mind Tools assessment framework details the set of essential tools that are required by an exceptional leader, to be a valued and outstanding contributor in his/her organization. Additionally, from the personal assessment using the framework, the score attained was sixty-six out of a possible one hundred. On the other hand, aMACH-IV testis an assessment tool that can be employed to describe the personality of a leader in an organization. In this case, the personal assessment of the MACH-IV test revealed a personal score of six-eight out of a possible one hundred.

Analysis and Reflection

            The high score of sixty-six in the Mind Tools assessment illustrates that I understand my role as a communicator. That is both in sending and receiving messages from and others. Also, from the score, I can anticipate problems, and I can devise effective ways of communicating them. Moreover, I can inspire followers to take action through effective communication, and I have a high emotional intelligence when dealing with others. On the other hand, the score of sixty-eight in the MACH-IV score is considered to be a high MACH.  In this case, the score explains my personality because I use a detached and calculating approach in my interaction with others.

            Furthermore, I am more manipulative and in most cases, not easily understood. Nevertheless, I am very persuasive to others and highly successful in attaining the desired goals. Moreover, in a leadership position, I tend to be calm, and I always tend to exploit the vulnerability of followers to achieve the desired objectives. Furthermore, as a high MACH, I tend to flourish in the face-to-face settings. Additionally, I tend to thrive in situations where emotions hold very minimal value towards goal attainment. Ultimately, I always try to do whatever it takes to achieve the desired objectives, irrespective of the methodology employed.

Evidence-Based Leadership Plan

So as to promote my role as a nursing leader, an appropriate leadership plan will have to be implemented. The plan will be executed with a defined timeline of six weeks. In the first half of the leadership plan implementation period, I will reinforce my communication skills as a leader through taking a communication improvement education short course. The importance of good communication by clinical leaders can be supported by an evidence published by research done by Ennis et al. (2013). The research identified good communication to be an important attribute of the clinical leadership of nursing (Ennis et al., 2013). Through effective communication, a nursing leader can communicate to all personnel in the organization pertaining how to coordinate their efforts to secure the organization’s objectives (Porter-O’Grady &Malloch, 2016).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the MACH-IV and the Mind Tools assessment framework are highly effective leadership assessment tools that can be employed to promote the leadership skills of nursing leaders in the healthcare profession. The high scores of sixty-six in a Mind Tools assessment tools represents a leader with effective communication skills. On the other hand, a high MACH of sixty-eight characterizes a leader’s personality with attributes of being detached and calculating when making organizational decisions. Also, a high MACH leader is immensely persuasive to others and highly successful in attaining the desired goals. Furthermore, a high MACH leader tends to thrive in situations where emotions hold very minimal value towards goal attainment. Ultimately, he tends to do whatever it takes to achieve the desired objectives, irrespective of the methodology employed.