Word Length:500-700words
TaskRequirements:The‘CaseScenario’onthetopicof‘BusinessStructures’
Assignment Topic -Case Scenario (Business Structures)
Warwick and Sunny are two friends from University want to set up a college. Both will provide some start up capital. Warwick says that he trusts Sunny. They want the least risky business structure. What advice would you give to Warwick and Sunny on the best business structure for them. Consider also whether the type of industry that Warwick and Sunny are looking at impacts your advice.
Additional Comment:
Studentsarerequiredto‘gobeyond’thePrescribedTextbookandto use additional Library resources to support your answers.
Use of Resources
You are required to use a range of legal resources in addition to the textbooks including at least two (2) textbooks and four (4) Online Legal Resources; as supporting evidence for the arguments, analysis and discussion of the two Assignment questions.
CRITERIA USED TO GRADE THIS TASK
See Separate Marking Guide for detailed marking criteria and allocation
SUBMISSION DETAILS
Submissions must be uploaded online via the Turnitin Drop Box
FEEDBACK AND RETURN OF WORK
Feedback and marks will be provided via the LMS within two weeks of submission
Assessment Task 2 | Essay Business Structures) | |||||
Criteria | HD (80% – 100%) | Distinction (70% – 79%) | Credit (60% – 69%) | Pass (50% – 59%) | Fail (31% – 49%) | Fail Minus (0% – 30%) |
Criterion 1 Clear Identification and Analysis of at least four (4) key issues involving Business Structures using examples from the Case Study and provision of detailed advice and recommendations for the most suitable Business structure for the establishment of the ‘Hospitality and Tourism’ business. |
Excellent identification and analysis of at least four (4) key issues using examples from the Case Study Detailed provision of both advice and recommendations for the most suitable Business structure for the establishment of the ‘Hospitality and Tourism’ business. |
Very good identification and analysis of three (3) key issues using examples from the Case Study Detailed provision of both advice and recommendations for the most suitable Business structure for the establishment of the ‘Hospitality and Tourism’ business. |
Good identification and analysis of three (3) key issues using examples from the Case Study Provision of advice and recommendations for the most suitable Business structure for the establishment of the ‘Hospitality and Tourism’ business. |
Satisfactory identification and analysis of two (3) key issues using examples from the Case Study Some provision of advice and recommendations at a superficial level for the most suitable Business structure for the establishment of the ‘Hospitality and Tourism’ business. |
Addresses only some of the requirements set out in the question. Referencing Guide shows multiple errors and inconsistencies. |
Addresses few or none of the requirements set out in the question. Referencing Guide are not followed correctly. |
Criterion 2 Assignment demonstrates a discussion of the processes and requirements of Business Structure in the formation of a new business as they relate to the Case Study examples |
Excellent comprehension and discussion of the processes and requirements of Business Structure in the formation of a new business and excellent use of examples from the Case Study | Broad comprehension and a very good discussion of the processes and requirements of Business Structure in the formation of a new business and excellent use of examples from the Case Study | Sound comprehension and discussion of the processes and requirements of Business Structure in the formation of a new business and examples are cited from the Case Study. | General comprension of the topic and discussion of the processes and requirements of Business Structure in the formation of a new business andsome usage of examples from the Case Study | There is little evidence of a logical structure, the text lacks coherence. The meaning of the text is difficult to make out and vocabulary is somewhat limited and repetitive. Professional or academic terminology is often not relevant and/or correctly used. An objective and dispassionate tone is used throughout. Many grammatical or spelling errors. |
Did not meet the Criteria. |
Criterion 3 Assignment demonstrates exceptional critical reflection and insightful analysis, demonstrating comprehensive knowledge of relevant theories and concepts. | Exceptional critical reflection and insightful analysis, demonstrating comprehensive knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. | High level of critical reflection and analysis, demonstrating broad knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. | Good level of critical reflection and analysis, demonstrating broad knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. | Satisfactory level critical reflection and analysis, demonstrating general knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. | Lack of critical reflection and analysis, demonstrating incomplete knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. | No critical reflection or analysis, demonstrating little or no knowledge of relevant theories, debates and/or concepts. |
Criterion 4 Writing is fluent and lively. Correct spelling and grammar throughout. Sources are correctly referenced.. |
Writing is fluent and lively. Correct spelling and grammar throughout, with the occasional minor error. Sources are correctly referenced. |
Writing is fluent and interesting. Correct spelling and grammar throughout, with the occasional minor error. Sources are correctly referenced. |
Writing is fluent but not always interesting. Mostly correct spelling and grammar throughout, with minor errors and the occasional major error. Sources are referenced. |
Writing is fluent but not always interesting. Mostly correct spelling and grammar throughout, with minor errors and the occasional major error. Sources are referenced. |
Writing is disjointed. Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect. Sources are not referenced. |
Writing is disjointed. Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect. Sources are not referenced. |