Assessment of the Workplace Environment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Assessment of the Workplace Environment
Examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, which may be found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Examine the Workplace Assessment Template.
Consider the results of your Discussion post in terms of your assessment of workplace civility and the response you received from coworkers.
Choose and read one or more of the following articles from the Resources section:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski are all members of the Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski families (2011)
‘Clark’ is a (2018)
‘Clark’ is a (2015)
Griffin and Clark are a couple (2014)When you hire me, I’ll send you these resources and a template.
The Task (about 3-6 pages):
Part 1: Examining the Workplace (1-2 pages)
For this Module’s Discussion, go over the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed earlier.
Describe the findings of the Work Environment Assessment you conducted at your place of business.
Identify two items about the results that surprised you, as well as one belief you had prior to doing the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the Assessment’s findings mean for the health and civility of your workplace.
Reviewing the Literature (Part 2) (1-2 pages)Describe the principle or notion given in the article(s) you choose in a few sentences.
Explain how the article(s)’ theory or notion connects to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how the idea outlined in your chosen article(s) could be used by your organization to promote organizational health and/or generate stronger work teams. Give instances and be specific.
Part 3 (12 pages): Evidence-Based Strategies for Developing High-Performance Interprofessional TeamsRecommend at least two ideas for addressing any flaws found in your Work Environment Assessment that are supported by the research.
Recommend at least two solutions to support the successful practices identified in your Work Environment Assessment.Part 1 of the rubric is an accurate, detailed, and completed Work Environment Assessment Template.
The responses properly and completely summarize the findings of a Work Environment Assessment conducted at a workplace.
The responses accurately and clearly identify two surprising aspects of the data, as well as describe in detail at least one preexisting belief that was validated throughout the evaluation.
The responses properly and thoroughly describe what the assessment’s findings say regarding a workplace’s health and civility.
Part 2: The comments must accurately and completely describe the topic or notion given in the chosen article.
The comments fully and clearly describe how the theory or concept offered in the article relates to the Work Environment Assessment results.
The comments accurately and clearly explain how an organization could use the concepts discussed in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or work teams.
The responses are thoroughly supported by specific and extensive examples.
Part 3: The responses clearly and comprehensively offer at least two options for addressing any inadequacies identified in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses provide detailed recommendations for at least two tactics that can be used to support the effective practices identified in the Work Environment Assessment.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!