Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Art History
Art 100 ASSIGNMENT SHEETChoose just 1 (one) numbered comparison only!
Indicate your class on your paper (SECTION 17785 or 17792)
FIND AND READ THE TEXT UP TO CHAPTER OF THE ASSIGNMENT!
READ ALL ASSIGNMENTS CAREFULLY BEFORE WRITING IN FRONT OF A GOOD QUALITY PICTURE OF THE CHOSEN ASSIGNMENT!
WRITE ABOUT THE PIECE AS AN EXAMPLE OF THE PERIOD STYLE SPECIFIED!
Read your notes, the relevant chapters in the text and display your understanding of ideas from class and the book. UNDERSTAND & DEFINE the STYLE BEFORE and WHEN you write!
Record the NAME, ARTIST, COUNTRY/CULTURE and the PERIOD STYLE of the work.
SPELL ART WORDS CORRECTLY-ALWAYS SUPPORT AND FULLY EXPLAIN ALL IDEAS!
1.COMPARE: FRENCH GOTHIC Chartres Cathedral begun 1134, 1194 with its pointed ribbed groin vaulting, stained glass, verticality, love of detail, connection with courts of the Kings WITH
ITALIAN GOTHIC Florence Cathedral begun 1296 (both Chap 7) with its Domed crossing, Ancient Roman- Style horizontal solidity, simple Geometry, Compartmentalization.
Compare and contrast these important examples of FRENCH (Northern) and ITALIAN gothic styles.
2. (FLORENTINE) EARLY ITALIAN RENAISSANCE Masaccio “Holy Trinity” Chap 8
Describe and enumerate ALL 5 principles of EARLY RENAISSANCE
painting as presented in the STUDY SHEET- DEFINE, explain, describe how Masaccio presents each of these 5 ideas in this fresco painting.
3. COMPARE: FLORENTINE HIGH RENAISSANCE Leonardo DaVinci “Last Supper”1495 Chap 9 (See the 7 principles of High Renaissance painting, study sheet)
WITH
VENETIAN HIGH RENAISSANCE Tintoretto “Last Supper”1594 (do principles apply?)
Two High Renaissance treatments of the same subject separated by a century. The symmetry, simplicity, balance and rational clarity of the Florentine Leonardo, and flickering brushwork depicting emotive, unbalanced complexity in the Venetian Tintoretto- while Leonardo shows the table frontally in one point perspective, parallel with the picture plane, Tintoretto moves the table diagonally, shooting it into deep space- what effect do these differing conceptions have?
4. FLEMISH BAROQUE Peter Paul Rubens ‘Elevation of the Cross” 1610 Chap 10
Describe and enumerate ALL 5 principles of BAROQUE painting as presented in the study sheet- DEFINE, explain, describe how Rubens presents each of these 5 ideas in this flamboyant painting.
5. COMPARE: FRENCH ROCOCCO Fragonard “The Swing” 1766 Chap 11 This painting reflects the 18th century Rococco aristocratic taste for an art of pure pleasure- feminine soft pastel blues and pinks, evident brushwork, erotic frivolous subjects all painted with effortless ease.
WITH
FRENCH NEOCLASSICAL Jacques-Louis David “Oath of the Horatii” 1784 Chap 11
David helped begin the French Revolution with this work, intended as a revolutionary statement- DIFFERENT as possible from Royal tastes- showing masculine hard muscles, hard stone, subject reflecting self sacrifice for the state, in an archeologically correct Greco- Roman style- clear and balanced, frontal as in bas-relief, highly finished, labor intensive and without visible brushstrokes.
ALL WORKS ASSIGNED ARE IN YOUR TEXTBOOK (I’m using 2ND ED)
USE THESE TO FIND BETTER QUALITY PICTURES ON GOOGLE IMAGES!
Question 1
image8.jpg
Pg 190,Chapter 7, (7-5,6)
image2.jpg
Pg. 213, Chapter 7 (7-36)
Question 2
image3.jpg
Pg. 237, Chapter 8 (8-23)
Question 3
image4.jpg
Pg. 257 Chapter 9 (9-3)
image5.jpg
Pg 276 Chapter 9 (9-25)
Question 4
image6.jpg
Pg. 304 Chapter 10 (10-17)
Question 5
image1.jpg
image7.jpg
Pg 323 Chapter 11 (11-4) Pg. 332 Chapter 11 (11-15)
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!