An artificial Intelligence System Promoting Financial Institutions
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
FinTech: An artificial Intelligence System Promoting Financial Institutions
Students Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Professor
Date
Page Break
FinTech: An artificial Intelligence System Promoting Financial Institutions
The interaction between the internet and business has opened new opportunities for efficiency in business operations. Other sections of business operation, like sales and marketing, have embraced the use of technology. For example, most sales are currently carried out online; however, most financial services fail to acknowledge the potential of financial technologies in their development and evolution. According to a statement by the governor of the Bank of England, the FinTech revolution will bring democracy to financial services (Carney, 2017). The governor went on to say that the new technology will give consumers variety and allow small and medium-sized enterprises to access credit. The current inquiry is interested in the growth of FinTech and the opportunities and challenges it presents to the market. According to Shim and Shin (2016), China has been greatly impacted by the growth of FinTech and has seen its implication first-hand in the market. As such, a focus on China will play a significant role in shedding light on the implications of FinTech to financial services.
Research Questions
1. How do FinTech intermediaries help bring additional liquidity to the market?
2. How does FinTech promote democracy in financial services?
3. Is there a development of new regulations to support FinTech?
Discussion
FinTech has gained attraction in fast markets like China. However, the development and adaptation of FinTech solutions have been slow and rigid due to challenging regulations (Philippon, 2016). Despite the regulations, FinTech has managed to improve democracy in the market by allowing small businesses to access loans easily. According to a recent study that sought to discuss the FinTech ecosystem, it was found that there was an increase of 62% in FinTech ventures across the globe between 2016 and 2017 (Lee & Shin, 2018). The data indicates that there is a widespread adaptation of FinTech technologies to aid in the growth of financial service in China. According to a study that sought to examine the implications of FinTech in the case of a Chinese Youth Microloan startup, it was found that FinTech solutions played a significant role in allowing small companies to find a niche in the highly regulated financial market (Leong, Tan, Xiao, Tan, & Sun, 2017). The high adaptation of FinTech solutions in China indicates that the technology presents a wider range of opportunities for the financial market to develop.
FinTech is also associated with increasing liquidity in the market. For example, Chinese startups have been advantaged with the opportunity to access small loans from online financial institutions, allowing these young companies to grab a niche for themselves in the otherwise restricted financial market. FinTech is playing a significant role in increasing liquidity in the Chinese market because online technologies share huge amounts of information in the form of big data that improves transparency in business. The interconnectedness of FinTech solutions increases transparency and promotes security to both clients and vendors.
Methodology
The study will employ a mixed-method technique. The qualitative part will make use of empirical literature review to draw information relevant to the current line of inquiry. It will focus on sources that have been published within the last five years to maintain the relevance of the study regarding current trends, considering technology is dynamic and changes daily. The quantitative part will employ the analytical survey, where questionnaires will be used to collect data from relevant stakeholders in the financial sector. The two approaches will provide a holistic investigation in finding answers to the given research questions.
Expected Results
From an evaluation of the current data on FinTech solutions, it is expected that most studies will point to a positive contribution of financial technologies to the market. It is projected that the autonomy of FinTech systems will promote democracy and increase liquidity in the market.
Page Break
References
Carney, M. (2017, January). The promise of Fintechsomething new under the sun. In?Speech at Deutsche Bundesbank G20 Conference, by Bank of England Governor Mark Carney, January 25th.
Lee, I., & Shin, Y. J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges.?Business Horizons,?61(1), 35-46.
Leong, C., Tan, B., Xiao, X., Tan, F. T. C., & Sun, Y. (2017). Nurturing a FinTech ecosystem: The case of a youth microloan startup in China.?International Journal of Information Management,?37(2), 92-97.
Philippon, T. (2016).?The fintech opportunity?(No. w22476). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Shim, Y., & Shin, D. H. (2016). Analyzing Chinas fintech industry from the perspective of actor-network theory.?Telecommunications Policy,?40(2-3), 168-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.11.005
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!