AI weapon human-machine interaction safety

January 14, 2023

AI weapon human-machine interaction safety

Order ID	53563633773
Type	Essay
Writer Level	Masters
Style	APA
Sources/References	4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order	5-10 Pages

Description/Paper Instructions

AI weapon human-machine interaction safety

Autonomous weapons, also known as lethal autonomous weapons systems (LAWS), are military systems that are capable of selecting and engaging targets without human intervention. These weapons raise important ethical and legal questions about the use of force and the relationship between humans and machines. One of the key concerns is trust in the human-machine interaction of autonomous weapons.

Trust in autonomous weapons systems is crucial for their effective use in military operations. Without trust, commanders may be hesitant to use these systems, and the military may not receive the full benefits of their capabilities. However, building trust in autonomous weapons systems is a complex and challenging task.

One of the main challenges in building trust in autonomous weapons is ensuring that the systems are reliable and safe. Autonomous weapons must be able to make decisions that are consistent with the laws of armed conflict and international humanitarian law. They must also be able to identify and avoid civilian targets, and they must be able to operate in a way that minimizes the risk of unintended harm. Ensuring that autonomous weapons are reliable and safe requires extensive testing and evaluation, as well as ongoing monitoring and maintenance.

Another challenge in building trust in autonomous weapons is ensuring that the systems are transparent and explainable. Autonomous weapons must be able to provide clear and transparent information about their decision-making processes, so that commanders and other stakeholders can understand how and why the systems are making the decisions they are making. This is particularly important in cases where the systems may be making decisions that are controversial or have serious consequences.

A third challenge in building trust in autonomous weapons is ensuring that the systems are accountable. Autonomous weapons must be able to be held accountable for their actions, so that commanders and other stakeholders can be held responsible for the decisions they make. This requires clear and transparent reporting mechanisms, as well as clear and transparent legal frameworks for dealing with the consequences of autonomous weapons’ actions.

Finally, in building trust in autonomous weapons, it is important to ensure that the systems are trustworthy. Autonomous weapons must be able to operate in a way that is consistent with the values and principles of the military, and they must be able to operate in a way that is consistent with the values and principles of society. This requires ongoing dialogue and engagement between the military, other government agencies, civil society, and other stakeholders, to ensure that the systems are being developed and used in a way that is consistent with the values and principles of society.

In conclusion, building trust in autonomous weapons systems is a complex and challenging task. It requires ensuring that the systems are reliable and safe, transparent and explainable, accountable, and trustworthy. However, by addressing these challenges, we can build trust in autonomous weapons systems, and ensure that these systems are used in a way that is consistent with the laws of armed conflict, international humanitarian law, and the values and principles of society.

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE	NO RESPONSE	POOR / UNSATISFACTORY	SATISFACTORY	GOOD	EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking.	30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking.	40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete.	50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points).	Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper.	5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6^th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper.	10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6^th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources.	15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources.	20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6^th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors	10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors	15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage.	20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points)	Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper.	3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6^th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6^th edition requirements whatsoever.	5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6^th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper	7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment.	10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6^th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.

GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!