AI weapon control
Order ID |
53563633773 |
Type |
Essay |
Writer Level |
Masters |
Style |
APA |
Sources/References |
4 |
Perfect Number of Pages to Order |
5-10 Pages |
Description/Paper Instructions
AI weapon control
Autonomous weapons, also known as “killer robots,” are a new and rapidly developing technology in the field of military defense. These weapons are designed to select and engage targets without human intervention, using artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to make decisions on their own.
The use of autonomous weapons raises a number of legal and ethical concerns. On the legal side, there are questions about the responsibility for the actions of these weapons and how to hold individuals or organizations accountable for their use. On the ethical side, there are concerns about the loss of human control over the use of deadly force and the potential for these weapons to perpetuate or even exacerbate existing conflicts.
To address these concerns, a number of organizations and governments have called for a ban on the development, production, and use of autonomous weapons. The United Nations has established a Group of Governmental Experts (UN GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems to examine the issue and make recommendations for future action.
One of the main arguments for a ban on autonomous weapons is the lack of human control over the decision-making process. With traditional weapons systems, humans are involved in the targeting and engagement process, allowing for a degree of oversight and accountability. Autonomous weapons, on the other hand, operate on their own, with no human intervention. This means that there is no one to hold accountable if something goes wrong or if the weapon causes unintended harm.
Another argument for a ban is the potential for these weapons to perpetuate or exacerbate existing conflicts. Autonomous weapons have the ability to operate 24/7, without the need for human operators to rest or sleep. This could lead to an increase in the number of strikes and the intensity of conflicts, making it more difficult to bring them to an end.
Additionally, some argue that the use of autonomous weapons could lead to a “slippery slope” towards greater automation and the eventual elimination of human decision-making in warfare. This could fundamentally change the nature of warfare and potentially lead to a more violent and destructive world.
On the other hand, some argue that autonomous weapons could actually make warfare less destructive and more humane. These weapons could potentially make it easier to comply with international humanitarian law (IHL) by reducing the risk of human error and increasing the precision of strikes. Additionally, some argue that the use of autonomous weapons could reduce the number of casualties among military personnel and civilians.
Despite these arguments, the majority of states and international organizations call for a complete ban on autonomous weapons, including the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots, a coalition of non-governmental organizations.
In conclusion, the development and use of autonomous weapons raise a number of legal and ethical concerns. While some argue that these weapons could make warfare more precise and less destructive, the majority of states and international organizations call for a ban on their development, production, and use. The UN GGE on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems continues to examine the issue and make recommendations for future action.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE |
NO RESPONSE |
POOR / UNSATISFACTORY |
SATISFACTORY |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. |
30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. |
40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. |
50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. |
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). |
Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. |
5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. |
10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. |
15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. |
20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. |
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors |
10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors |
15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. |
20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. |
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) |
Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. |
3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. |
5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper |
7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. |
10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. |
|
|
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
|
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!! |
|
|
AI weapon control
PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!