Accountant’s Treatment for The Investment in Aim Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Accountant’s Treatment for The Investment in Aim Assignment
Below are extracts of equity and reported profit the financial statements of Hull plc (Hull) and two entities in which Hull has made investments during the year ended 31 December 2021: At 31 December 2021: Hull Step Arm Equity and Liabilities £’000 £’000 £’000 £1 Ordinary shares 6,000 5,000 2,000 Share premium 2,000 – – Retained Earnings 7,540 2,900 580 Total Equity 15,540 7,900 2,580 Profit after tax for the year ended 31 December 2021 (from income statement): 7,440 2,160 280
The accountant for Hull has prepared draft consolidated financial statements but is unsure of their accuracy and has asked you for advice. You have found out the following: 1. Investment in Arm: On 1 July 2021, Hull paid £900,000 in cash to acquire 30% of the ordinary shares of Arm when Arm’s retained earnings was £440,000.
The accountant has included this as a simple investment at a cost of £900,000 in the consolidated financial statements. 2. Investment in Step: On 1 May 2021, Hull acquired 55% of the ordinary shares of Step when the retained earnings of Step stood at £1.46m. Consideration comprised cash of £3.0m and a share exchange based on 1 share in Hull for every 2 held by shareholders of Step. Hull’s shares had a market value of £2.20 at that time.
There was no movement in Step’s shares during the year. Hull had not accounted for the share exchange in the above extracts. The accountant had (incorrectly) worked out goodwill as follows: Incorrect Goodwill calculation: £’000 £’000 Cash 3,000 NCI (45% x 6,460) [NCI’s share of net assets] 2,907 Ordinary Shares 5,000 5,907 Retained earnings (at acquisition) 1,460 Net assets at acquisition (6,460) Incorrect Goodwill (bargain purchase) (553) On 1 May 2021 fair values (not included in the calculations above) were: a) Non-controlling interest (NCI) had a fair value of £4.5m b) One of Step’s buildings had a fair value £1.2m higher than the carrying value, and its useful life was 20 years (with no residual value). Depreciation is charged by month.
Required:
- a) Explain, with workings, why the accountant’s treatment for the investment in Aim is not correct and how it should be accounted for in Hull’s consolidated statement of financial position and in Hull’s consolidated income statement.
- b) Explain, with workings, why the accountant’s negative goodwill calculation (above) indicates that it is likely to be incorrect, and how goodwill should be accounted for in accordance with IFRS 3, using the full goodwill method incorporating fair values provided. Include all corrections required (for example, as journals) and provide a reworked calculation for Goodwill under IFRS 3.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!