A charismatic leader and Organizational Change
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
A charismatic leader and Organizational Change
Chapter Fifteen Organizational Change
443
Chapter Fifteen Organizational Change
A charismatic leader. A visionary leader. A demanding taskmaster (which might be good or bad leadership). People have described the leadership of Steve Jobs in many ways, and with considerably divergent attitudes toward that leadership. These diverse views illustrate that leadership is multidimensional; it exists in many ways and forms. Furthermore, people are not necessarily effective leaders from all of these perspectives. This chapter explores leadership from the five perspectives that are apparent in the huge volume of leadership literature: competency, behavioral, contingency, transformational, and implicit.2 In the final section, we also consider cross-cultural and gender issues in organizational leadership. But first, we learn about the meaning of leadership and shared leadership.
What Is Leadership?
A few years ago, 54 leadership experts from 38 countries reached a consensus that leadership is about influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members.3 This definition has two key components. First, leaders motivate others through persuasion and other influence tactics. They use their communication skills, rewards, and other resources to energize the collective to achieve challenging objectives. Second, leaders are enablers. They arrange the work environment—such as allocating resources and altering communication patterns— so employees can achieve organizational objectives more easily.
Leadership is one of the most researched and discussed topics in the field of organizational behavior. Google returns a whopping 724 million web pages that mention either “leader” or “leadership” (24 million of them have one of these words in the title). Google Scholar lists 173,000 journal articles and books that have one or both words in the title. Amazon, the online retailer, currently lists more than 55,000 printed leadership books. As Exhibit 12.1 illustrates, the number of leadership books and materials added to the U.S. Library of Congress catalog has grown exponentially over the past half-century. Why does the topic of leadership command so much attention? Possibly because leadership
– 7336 – 3054 1711 1240 146 130 223 358 346 446 774 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Number of books and other materials with “leader” or “leadership” in the title or citation cataloged by the U.S. Library of Congress and currently listed by decade that the item was published or produced. The U.S. Library of Congress is the world’s largest library.
EXHIBIT 12.1 Filling the U.S. Library of Congress with Leadership Books and Materials
1900-09 1910-191920-29 1930-39 1940-49 1950-59 1960-69 1970-79 1980-89 1990-99 2000-09
8000
350
The Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station is the largest nuclear power plant in the United States, producing enough electricity to serve 4 million people in California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Along with extensive technical and team-related training, Palo Verde Nuclear’s 3,000 employees learn about the company’s leadership model, which emphasizes safety, operational focus, long-term productivity, and cost-effectiveness. The overarching principle of that leadership model is: “Every employee is a leader, regardless of title or position.” In other words, the company encourages shared leadership, whereby everyone is expected to serve as a leader to fulfill the company’s key objectives.4
does make a difference to an organization’s effectiveness. Furthermore, we are awed by individuals who influence and motivate others beyond expectations to build commitment to a better future.
1
Chapter Twelve Leadership in Organizational Settings
Part Three Team Processes 351
350
Part Three Team Processes
leadership
Influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members.
SHARED LEADERSHIP
As part of its employee engagement initiative, Rolls-Royce Engine Services in Oakland, California, involved employees directly with clients, encouraged weekly huddles for information sharing, and accepted employee requests for less micromanagement. Employees at the aircraft engine repair facility not only experienced higher levels of engagement and empowerment; they also accepted more leadership responsibilities. “I saw people around me, all front-line employees, who were leaders,” says a machine programmer at the Rolls-Royce Oakland plant. “They weren’t actually leading the company, but they were people you would listen to and follow. We didn’t have titles, but people had respect for what we did.”5
Rolls-Royce Engine Services has moved toward greater shared leadership, in which employees throughout the organization informally assume leadership responsibilities in various ways and at various times.6 Shared leadership is based on the idea that leadership is plural, not singular. It doesn’t operate out of one formally assigned position, role, or individual. Instead, employees lead each other as the occasion arises. Shared leadership typically supplements formal leadership. However, WL. Gore & Associates and Semco SA rely almost completely on shared leadership because there is no formal hierarchy or organizational chart.7 In fact, when Gore employees are asked in annual surveys “Are you a leader?” more than 50 percent of them answer “Yes.”
shared leadership
The view that leadership is broadly distributed, rather than assigned to one person, such that people within the team and organization lead each other.
The late John Gardner, the former U.S. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare who introduced Medicare and public broadcasting, wrote more than two decades ago that the “vitality” of large organizations depends on shared leadership.8 Employees across all levels of the organization need to seek out opportunities and solutions to problems rather than rely on formal leaders to serve these roles. Gardner observed, for example, that successful teams consist of individuals other than the formal leader
EXHIBIT 12.3
Know yourself
Be yourself
2
Chapter Twelve Leadership in Organizational Settings
Part Three Team Processes 354
Authentic Leadership
► Engage in self-reflection »Receive feedback from
trusted sources • Understand your life
story
> Develop your own style
- Apply your values
■ Maintain a positive core self-evaluation
Furthermore, leaders have practical intelligence. Cognitive intelligence is assessed by performance on clearly defined problems with sufficient information and usually one best answer. In contrast, practical intelligence is assessed by performance in real-world settings, where problems are poorly defined, information is missing, and more than one solution may be plausible.20 • Emotional intelligence. Effective leaders have a high level of emotional intelligence.21 They are able to perceive and express emotion, assimilate emotion in thought, understand and reason with emotion, and regulate emotion in themselves and others (see Chapter 4).
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!