Building a Safer Health System and Crossing the Quality Chasm
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Building a Safer Health System and Crossing the Quality Chasm
OM002
Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.
Access the following to complete this Assessment:
Compliance Issues Worksheet
Click each of the items below to complete this assessment.
Scenario
Imagine that you are an executive with a healthcare consultancy that helps hospitals improve patient experiences by creating and implementing sustainable quality improvement programs. Consider your role as you answer the questions in this Assessment.
Prompts
An important part of your role at the consulting firm is to lead training sessions at hospitals nationwide. At the training sessions, you educate hospital administrators on the history of the quality-management movement in healthcare. Many of the individuals you train have little or no background in quality management, and you have found that leadership is more receptive to changes if they understand the history of the quality-management movement in healthcare.
- Briefly summarize the history of the quality movement, in general, to set the context for this presentation.
- Explain the influence of Deming and Donabedian (referenced in Chapter 1 of the Varkey text) in the healthcare quality-management movement.
- Describe the impact that the two reports, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System and Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, had on quality management in the healthcare system.
- Describe the role of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in the healthcare quality-management movement.
- Summarize the impact of The Joint Commission accreditation in the quality-improvement process of participating hospitals.
- Create a PowerPoint presentation to communicate the following information to your audience. (8–10 slides)
As a result of your success as a healthcare-quality consultant, you have been invited to appear as a guest on a nationally syndicated news show. The show explores the topic of quality in healthcare. The interviewer asks you, “Why is a hospital different than a nuclear power plant or a commercial airline? Why can’t hospitals achieve the same quality levels as high-reliability organizations?” Respond to the questions by explaining the challenges related to ensuring quality and safety standards in hospitals. In addition, explain how hospitals can achieve the same quality levels as high-reliability organizations. (1 page)
In your role as a healthcare consultant, administrators and executives often ask you about the differences and similarities between the major accrediting agencies. Many want to know about the DNV surveys and how they compare to The Joint Commission (JC) surveys. Prepare a 1-page document that summarizes the differences and similarities between the JC and DNV surveys. (1 page)
Your hospital has recently received deemed status recognition from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). At the same time your healthcare analytics department has presented you with the following data:
All Cause Readmission Control Chart
Does the deemed status determination alone guarantee the public that you provide quality healthcare? (1 pages)
The dean of the Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) program at your alma mater has asked you to participate in a debate on transparency in the healthcare system. As part of your preparation for the debate, prepare a 3-page paper in which you:
Address your definition of the concept of transparency in the healthcare system.
Explain the primary benefits and drawbacks of transparency in the healthcare system.
Address your opinion on whether the benefits of transparency in the healthcare system outweigh the drawbacks? Will transparency create more informed healthcare consumers, lead to more questions, or both? Explain your answer.
Review the National Patient Safety Goals (NPSG) at http://www.jointcommission.org/standards_information/npsgs.aspx. Then, read the scenarios presented on the Compliance Issues Worksheet provided, and evaluate whether a violation had occurred. Based on your evaluation, complete the worksheet as follows:
If a compliance issue occurred, identify and classify the issue in the second column of the worksheet.
If no compliance issue occurred, explain why not (in the second column of the worksheet).
For each scenario, provide a recommended course of action in the third column of the worksheet.
Examples have been provided in the first two rows of the worksheet.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!