Canons of Classical Rhetoric Assignment
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Canons of Classical Rhetoric Assignment
Instructions
This exam consists of five essay questions. Your answer for each question should be a well
written, developed, and organized essay that fully addresses each component of the exam
questions. Follow the rules of formal writing: write in complete sentences, and do not use
any inappropriate language, textspeak, or emojis.
There is no minimum or maximum length for exam answers. Your answers will be graded
on how accurately and completely they answer the exam questions. A good general rule of
thumb is to write about 1-2 pages for each exam question.
Type your exam in a MS Word document. Use standard formatting (12-point Times New
Roman font, double spaced, 1-inch margins) and be sure to number your answers. When
you have completed your exam, submit it as an uploaded MS Word document.
Important Exam Rules:
You may consult your notes, textbook, and any other course materials as you
prepare your answers.
Your answers must be written in your own words—no quoting from or copying full
phrases and sentences from the textbook, course materials, or any other source
unless otherwise noted in the exam question.
Reminder: SafeAssign will automatically check your submitted file for any
evidence of plagiarism. Answers copied in whole or in part from other
sources will result in an exam grade of zero and will be submitted to the
university as an honor code violation.
You have until 11:59 PM (Central) on the due date to submit your exam. Late submissions
are accepted, but the standard late penalty (25% per day after the deadline) will apply.
Answer all 5 Questions:
imagine that you have been tasked with creating a multimedia campaign to promote
MSU to high school seniors. Identify and explain the specific strategies you would
use to meet each of the 5 objectives for persuaders.
What are the 5 canons of classical rhetoric? Explain each. Then, rank the canons
from least important to most important for persuaders in a media age. Be sure to
fully explain your reasoning for the ranking and support your argument with
original examples (not those already discussed in class or in the textbook).
Explain the 5 TARES standards for ethical persuasion. Using original examples (not
those already discussed in class or in the textbook) to support your claims, create an
argument for which standard you believe to be the most important in the media age
and which you believe to be the least important in the media age.
Explain the 4 biases of news coverage that may prevent accurate information from
reaching the public. Then, read the news article included at the end of this document
(Jack Healy’s “Underwater in the Las Vegas Desert, Years after the Housing Crash”).
To what extent does this article exhibit the 4 biases? Be sure to support your
analysis with specific examples from the article. As you are supporting your analysis
with specific examples, you may quote from the news article if you would like to
point to specific language used by the author.
Explain the 3 components of attitude formation. Then, select one of the issues listed
below and analyze how each of the 3 components contributes to your attitude about
that issue.
Issues (select one):
- Censorship
- Texting while driving
- Cloning
- Outsourcing
- Environmentalism
- Community service
article asked for towards the end is found on this link: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/03/us/las-vegas-2008-housing-crash.html?_r=0
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!