Planning Effective Long-Term Strategies
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Planning Effective Long-Term Strategies
Why Raed? (it should be changed)
- Charismatic leader with strong credentials including an MBA, excellent rapport and demonstrated experience in planning effective long-term strategies for increasing customer satisfaction by adeptly communicating contracts’ terms and renewals that boosted completion of business goals; prioritized customers’ requests, ensured all requirements are met and executed negotiations to resolve time sensitive issues that gained customer loyalty.
- To be add: -sense of humor – public speaking –
I am a confident pubic speaker with a sense of humor that..
Need to make the above statement more generalize based on my career bath : you can include team leader staigey thinking and more
PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATION
- UBT – University of Business & Technology, KSA, 2021
MBA -GPA 4.62 OF 5
- Massey University, New Zealand, 2016
B.Sc. – Business, Entrepreneurship and Small Business
CORE STRENGTHS & ENABLING SKILLS (0R Core Competencies)
- Client Relationship Management
- Client Retention Strategies
- Customer Service Policy
- Insurance Management
- Management Strategy
- Operations Management
- Emotional Intelligence
- Team Leadership
- Strategic Thinking
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Bupa Arabia, Jeddah, KSA
Working as “ Relationship Manager”, August 2017 – Present
Responsibilities/Accomplishments:
- Managed the development of Design the annual of product and services innovation of the portfolio
- Managed a portfolio of 87 companies with total lives 8500 and with over 35 Millions premium
- Implementing new strategies to communicate with customers; visiting top-tier clients to build relationships and maintain current ones. Executing customer-focused approach to attract lost clients by providing outstanding customer service by working one-on-one with clients and directly solving case specific problems
- Managing client review procedures by implementing feedback strategies to understand client needs for improving services. Negotiating new effective initiatives that increase revenue while enhancing reliability
- Developing revenue generating sales plans and ensured strict execution to achieve targets by providing customer confidence and decreasing escalations and complaints
- Managing policy holders’ complaints with tact and attention to prompt customer service. Delivering superior customer service and provided members with value and security in all lines of property, casualty and life insurance
- Developed a new Corporate Strategic Planning methodology and coordinated all related activities
Major Achievements:
- Led a team of 7 professionals to identify revenue potential and optimization as key drivers of future portfolio strategy.
- Achieved goals for maintaining 96% client retention.
- Quarter 3 SME star
- Successfully provided excellent customer service to insurance policy holders; achieved high customer satisfaction ratings
i.e. consistently scored outstanding
- Delivered presentation that raised awareness for Bupa Value, work ethics and behavior and motivated team to achieve targets.
- Contributed in strategically accelerating the project’s handover process between new business and relationship department to avoid any miscommunication or delay that lead to an increased customer satisfaction
Nasco International Insurance Group, Jeddah, KSA Worked as “Account Executive”, March 2017 – August 2017 Responsibilities/Accomplishments:
- Strategically formulated effective sales targets and action plans; critically researched, identified and developed qualified leads, prepared and presented persuasive presentations about products and services
- Critically assessed customer feedback and ratings in terms of their nature and severity of complains. Utilized opportunities to deepen client relationships while facilitating decision making and conflict resolution
Major Achievements:
- Significantly enhanced sales funnel by increasing contact list from 240 to 1200 contacts by utilizing multiple channels
Pyramid Plasterers Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand
Worked as “Business Development Manager – Part Time”, June 2014 – July 2016
Responsibilities/Accomplishments:
- Manage a team of 17 employees lead all day to day operations.
- Reviewed financial statements and ensured effective allocation of financial resources. Evaluated existing business performance and engaged in research gather informative data about customer trends. Assessed outcome of new business opportunities; identified unique offers to attract new clients
- Utilized up-to-date business acumen to assess quality of market research for better understanding of useful information, competitors and business practices; provided cost-effective recommendation to achieve goals and objectives
Major Achievement:
- Proposed and established new branch of the idea of assigning responsibility of site cleaning to interns.
Additional Experience:
- Worked in Saudi Airlines as “Customer Services Supervisor” from November 2006 – May 2008
- Worked as “Contracting Coordinator /Administrator” at Deem Co. for Contracting, Jeddah, KSA from 2005 – 2006
- Worked as “Sales Supervisor” at Al-Jawhra Kitchen Furniture Store, Jeddah, KSA from 2003 – 2004
- Project Management Certificate (2021)
PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATES
- Impactful Sales Presentations, Informa (2019)
- Customer Relationship Management, Leap to Success (2018)
- Principle of Selling Skills, Leap to Success (2017)
- Insurance Foundation Certificate Exam (IFCE), (2017)
- Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) – Basic Practitioner / Master Practitioner (2016)
- Principle of Selling Skills, Leap to Success (2017)
- Insurance Foundation Certificate Exam (IFCE), (2017)
- Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) – Basic Practitioner / Master Practitioner (2016)
Special Interest
- Writing: Author of an Arabic book call “ Yes For Pain”
- Public speaking
- Reading: very interesting about Management, Startup, Business development and self help Literature.
- Scuba Diving Instructor
- Hiking, fishing, camping
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!