Older Adults Patient Education Issues Essay and Interview
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Older Adults Patient Education Issues Essay and Interview
Healthcare workers utilize patient education to improve health outcomes and ease self-management. According to Perez-Ruiz & Desideri (2018), health education promotes the patient’s capacity to perform self-care since they gain more knowledge and skills. This paper seeks to describe the effect of patient education on care by use of a patient’s experience. To collect relevant information about this influence, the author interviewed an elderly man by the name of Mr. B. Mr. B is 55 years old who explained his experiences regarding the effect of patient education on healthcare.
Mr. B is African American whose physical examination reveals a gait problem due to recurrent joint and big toe pains since two years ago. He has been on treatment for gout and his condition is improving. Regarding patient education, the author recognizes that health information shared to a patient by healthcare providers equips them with skills and knowledge (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). Besides, the author understands that the patient education sessions should be meaningful to the patient by responding to their needs and worries. Karimi Moonaghi et al. (2016) highlight that the practice of skills taught and the application of gained knowledge improve self-care efficacy and well-being since a patient can manage conditions as taught.
Interview
Mr. B affirmed that a patient educator provides detailed information about gout and self-management during the treatment. He informed the author that he was advised to decrease alcohol intake and possibly quit its intake to minimize chances of relapse. The patient affirmed that healthcare professionals advised him to avoid red meat in diet, organ meat such as liver, and alcohol. Mr. B expressed his appreciation of the warmth and enthusiasm during the health education sessions (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). The patient informed the author that nurses in the care facilities would provide entertainment sessions, which helped him enjoy and avoid concentrating on his pain. Aung et al. (2017) recommend that patient education sessions should be interactive, enthusiastic, responsive to client’s needs, and motivated to improve care outcomes.
Mr. B said that he received detailed health education from a nurse and physician who instructed him to take his medications at the right time and as prescribed. Besides, the patient affirmed that healthcare workers urged taught him development, associated health problems, and treatment of gout. Mr. B informed the author that he was put on “medications to reduce pain and swelling”, which are anti-inflammatory drugs to manage the joint disorder (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). According to Abishek & Doherty (2018), proper patient education promotes correct adherence to anti-inflammatory especially corticosteroids whose overdose may cause adrenal insufficiency, osteoporosis, and muscle wasting.
Mr. B expressed his opinion that the healthcare providers who handled him during the treatment were fair and respectful. He argued that the care providers were not restrained by his old age during. “They handled me as my children would and cheerfully interacted with me”, said Mr. B (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). Perez-Ruiz & Desideri (2018) highlight those meaningful interactions with patient is significant in promoting patient satisfaction and overall heath outcome. Mr. B expressed his admiration for all care providers to respect each patient despite their age and address individual needs (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). The patient was particularly interested in how the nurses would encourage him to own up the treatment plan by engaging him in decision-making.
The patient reported that his wife and daughter were the caregivers who helped him throughout the illness and treatment time. They appreciated their support and sincere encouragement to follow healthcare instructions. Mr. B affirmed that the support offered by his family was immense. He expressed the contentment that his family provided during his illness. According to the patient, family care and love provided to him eased his pain and kept him optimistic (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021). Abishek & Doherty (2018) reveal that information shared during education with a patient should be shared to responsible family members or caregivers. Informed caregivers would ensure empathy and correct adherence to treatment plan.
Mr. B could access assistance services for food, medication, and transportation, which were made available by his family. He informed the author that her daughter made orders for food and stocked some foodstuffs in the kitchen. Besides, Mr. B affirmed that the choices of foodstuffs coincided with healthcare providers’ instructions (Y. Borja, personal communication, August 07, 2021).. The patient also listed the chosen foodstuffs, which included fresh fruits, vegetables, low-fat yogurt, fish, chicken, eggs, and whole grains. Ndosi et al. (2016) recommend the restriction of food with high purine content help prevent gout and arthritics attacks.
References
Abhishek, A., & Doherty, M. (2018). Education and non-pharmacological approaches for gout. Rheumatology, 57(suppl_1), i51-i58. https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/57/suppl_1/i51/4762104?login=true
Aung, T., Myung, G., & FitzGerald, J. D. (2017). Treatment approaches and adherence to urate-lowering therapy for patients with gout. Patient preference and adherence, 11, 795. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5403120/
Karimi Moonaghi, H., Emami Zeydi, A., & Mirhaghi, A. (2016). Patient education among nurses: bringing evidence into clinical applicability in Iran. Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria, 34(1), 137-151.
Ndosi, M., Johnson, D., Young, T., Hardware, B., Hill, J., Hale, C., … & Adebajo, A. (2016). Effects of needs-based patient education on self-efficacy and health outcomes in people with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicentre, single blind, randomised controlled trial. Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 75(6), 1126-1132. https://ard.bmj.com/content/annrheumdis/75/6/1126.full.pdf
Perez-Ruiz, F., & Desideri, G. (2018). Improving adherence to gout therapy: an expert review. Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 14, 793. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5939914/
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!