Global Economic and Business Operations
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Global Economic and Business Operations
Assessment Document 2020-21
Module Aim
This module examines business operations in the context of the global economy. One part investigates the operation of the global economy, looking particularly at international trade, the importance of multinational enterprises and foreign investment, and the growth and development of economics, especially the emerging economies of the BRIC group, among others. Other internationally important global economic issues are also examined, such as globalisation and environmental policy. In the business operations part of the module, the emphasis is on the management methods used to aid resource allocation and decision making in organisations. The nature of the operational process is examined and techniques are developed and applied in practical settings.
Module Learning Outcomes
Module learning outcomes detail the specific knowledge and understanding, cognitive and intellectual skills, practical and professional skills, and the key transferable skills that you will develop during this module. The learning outcomes for this module are detailed below. These learning outcomes will be assessed when marking your assignment.
Personal & Transferable Skills
- Engage effectively in debate and present arguments in a professional manner.
- Select and justify approaches to the analysis of organisational dynamics and apply them to produce practical improvements.
- Develop reflective practice skills in the study and analysis of global business dynamics.
Research, Knowledge & Cognitive Skills
- Describe and evaluate models of the dynamics of organisational behaviour.
- Critically evaluate alternative approaches to the modelling of global business dynamics.
- Effectively organise global business dynamics knowledge using a variety of techniques.
- Evaluate a range of approaches to the analysis of organisational dynamics models.
Professional Skills
- Understand and select from a range of key business dynamics modelling skills
Module Assessment
The assessment requirements for the module, in addition to the generic level 6 University Assessment Criteria and correct use of the required referencing format and style, include the following module specific criteria:
ICA (50% of the final mark Global Economics Part of the assessment
In-Course Assessment
Word Limit: 2000 words
Submission deadline:
You are required to answer all following questions using appropriate theories and concepts that were introduced in our lectures. Use evidence from case study articles where it is relevant.
Outline the factors in increased globalization. Discuss how these underling forces are interlinked and reinforce each other.
(40 marks)
Outline and discuss both benefits of and issues arising from trade protection. You should include the role of FDI in international trade and use evidence from case studies articles as examples to support your discussion.
(60 marks)
Important instructions:
Word limit: 2,000.
You should make use of the case study articles as supporting documents i.e. use the evidence from these articles to support your answers. You should also draw on the theories, concepts and frameworks that we covered in ‘global economics’ part of the module.
All references, quotes, paraphrasing and summaries should be cited clearly in the text (e.g. page numbers, authors, web address etc.) and sources consulted listed in the bibliography. Use a consistent referencing system, preferably Harvard.
The mark for this assignment is 50% of the final module mark.
Case Study Materials
Globalization 1.0 and 2.0 helped the G7. Globalisation 3.0 helped India and China instead. What will Globalisation 4.0 do
The contribution of Chinese FDI to Africa’s growth
The return to protectionism
The materials are attached in a separate file.
In this ICA,
Demonstrate good fundamental academic knowledge of Global Economics;
Critically analyse data using appropriate techniques;
Draw appropriate conclusions;
Present the assignment in a clear and understandable way, using the conventions appropriate to a business report with no spelling or grammatical errors.
Module Assessment Criteria ICA/ECA
Assignments will be marked in accordance with the following marking criteria:
ICA ECA Assessment Criteria Max Mark
1st Mark 2nd Mark Feedback Comments: Knowledge and understanding of Business Operations and Global Economics to be demonstrated through a clearly presented discussion of OPS MGMT and Strategy principles. 15 Knowledge and understanding of Supply Chain in Business Operations: to be demonstrated through a clearly presented description of the Supply chain of the product/service 30 Illustration and use of examples: to be demonstrated through clearly presented and accurate use of worked examples of the presented company/industry 20 Analysis, interpretation and solution of Business Operations and Global Economics: to be demonstrated through a clearly presented and accurate solution based on academic refrences, industrial reports 30 Presentation: your report should be well structured and written, be free of sentence construction and grammatical errors and include correctly formatted referencing. Analyses should be clearly and logically presented. 5 Module Assessment: Submission Guidelines
The reflective report should be submitted electronically using the ‘Assessment’ link on Blackboard. The deadline for submission is shown at the top of this document. Feedback will be provided for the purposes of guidance and to assist your learning and development. Any reference to marks is entirely provisional and subject to confirmation following University procedures. Only University Assessment Boards are able to issue confirmed, definitive marks.
The pass mark for this assessment is 40%.
Resit: If you do not reach a pass mark, you will have the opportunity to resit the module assignment by ‘making good’ your original submission using the feedback given by the marker and moderator.
Word limits and penalties for assignments
If the assignment is within +10% of the stated word limit no penalty will apply.
The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. If this word count is falsified, this will be regarded as academic misconduct.
The word count does not include:
Title and Contents page;
Reference list;
Appropriate tables, figures and illustrations.
Please note, in-text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011 p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.
If the word limit of the full assignment exceeds the +10% limit, 10% of the mark provisionally awarded to the assignment will be deducted. For example: if the assignment is worth 70 marks but is above the word limit by more than 10%, a penalty of 7 marks will be imposed, giving a final mark of 63.
Summarising and compressing the information in your assignment into the word limit is one of the skills that students are expected to acquire and demonstrate as part of the assignment process.
Page 1 of 1
PAGE
Page 2 of 6
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!