psychological construct of an individuals
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
psychological construct of an individuals
Running head: STANDARDIZED TESTS 1
STANDARDIZED TESTS 8
Standardized Tests
Capella University
Standardized Tests
Introduction
Psychology tests are techniques of accurately measuring the aspects associated with people’s problems. There are different types of tests available in psychology profession. These tests determine the psychological construct of the individuals. The instruments assess different factors including the interests, mental conditions such as anxiety, attitudes, intelligence, aptitude, achievement and personality. This representation considers a specific category of tests and examples of tools used in the case. The focus lies in personality. The tests involved are Revised NEO Personality Inventory, HEXACO Model of Personality Structure and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). These tools are compared and contrasted across the paper.
Element 1
The Revised NEO Personality (NEO-PI-R) is an instrument developed to measure the big five personality traits as outlined in the five factor model. The traits include conscientiousness, extraversion, openness to experience, neuroticism and agreeableness. Each of the traits has six subcategories. The inventory has a total of 240 items and is useful for both adults and children. The test can be used by doctors, educators, counselors, psychiatrists and psychologists in evaluation of mental state of individuals (Buros Center, 2019).
The HEXACO model evaluates personality dimensions and theoretical interpretations. It measures six personality dimensions which are emotionality, openness to experience, agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness and honesty-humility. The inventory has sets of 60, 100 and 200 questions. The test can be self-administered through accessing and filling out the questionnaire (Revolvy, 2019). MMPI is utilized in assessment of adult psychopathology and personality. The instrument bases the testing across ten scales. These are depression hysteria, hypochondriasis, psychopathic deviate, paranoia, masculinity or femininity, psychastenia schizophrenia, hypomania and social introversion. The test is comprised of 567 questions which are developed on true-false basis. There is a shorter version consisting of 338 questions in the same structure. This inventory is mainly used in the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders. It is also used to assess the mental stability of people joining critical professions (Mental Help, 2019).
Element 2
NEO-PI-R examines the five core personality traits which make it essential in assessing psychological state of individuals. The subcategories and the items included in the test ascertain that important facets of captured. The test is highly reliable and has significant internal consistency therefore it is quite suitable for the purpose. The aspects tested are basic parts of mental state evaluation which means the tool is well equipped to serve its objective. This revised version has made it more applicable in psychology. The aspects involved in the test ensure that it is appropriate for children, adults, persons with learning problems or employees (Big Five, 2019).
HEXACO model covers the same features as NEO-PI-R thus they display similar suitability in the psychological tests. The difference is in the addition of honesty-humility factor. This provides an extra dimension that provides basis of assessing the personality of individuals. The ease of administration of the test is vital in usability of the instrument (HEXACO, 2019). MMPI covers several elements of mental issues which puts the tool in a position to effectively assess psychological problems. It is very useful due to the high clinical reference that the methodology has. The fact that it is effective in dealing with mental illness and also in workplace situations means that is highly reliable (MMPI, 2019).
Element 3
NEO-PI-R uses 240 items and three other validity items which is extensive. The simplicity of the test is important to its effectiveness as children from 6th grade and above are able to discern the questions. Use of different forms helps in reaching more definitive test outcomes. It mainly uses self-reports for adults men and women but there are also observer reports which supplement the self-reported information. The 5-likert scale provides feasible outcomes from measurement of psychological factors. The questionnaire provides an effective way of collecting information. T scores are calculated from normative data collected (Maples-Keller et al, 2019)
HEXACO model has each domain with specific scales for measurement of the scores for the different dimensions. The HEXACO-60 scales show low correlations between scales and have high internal consistency levels. Self-reports and observer reports show high correlation which proves the reliability of the tests. The elements in HEXACO enhance the understanding of specific phenomena beyond the 5-factor model. The test encompasses all core factors impacting mental health in a comprehensive manner (De Vries et al, 2016)
The use of true-false questions presents a simple format in application of MMPI. The questions cover all areas imaginable on issues of mental capacity in relation to personality.. MMPI utilizes different forms of the test which expands the scope of the tool. Each of the scales used features distinct questions which are user-oriented. Validity scales provide an instrument for gauging the representativeness of the test results as they evaluate the accuracy and honesty (Sellbom, 2019).
Element 4
The revised NEO test a self-report which does not require skills apart from having the capacity to read and understand the questions. There is no qualification in this case. The observer report however requires expertise. The user-qualification depends on the specific professional putting the tool to practice. Self-report users can access the questions through online administration which uses easy questions. The level of qualification is A for the self-reported tests. This contains guidelines for children participation and also provides basic intervention guide and materials. The observer reports require level C qualification which entails graduate level training. This level of education gives the professionals the appropriate skills to apply in practice of using NEO tests (Maples-Keller et al, 2019)
The HEXACO model uses the same methods and elements as the revised NEO tests thus they share details in consideration of levels of skills knowledge and training. HEXACO has self-reports and observer reports. The latter does not require training while the observer reports require training. The administration of the MMPI tests requires knowledge on the appropriate use of the tests selection administration and interpretation of results. The participants in the test only need to understand the questions which places the group in Level A user qualification. The experts in administration require training and certification which qualifies for Level C (Sellbom, 2019; De Vries et al, 2016)
Comparison
All the tests incorporated use of series of questions to construct the psychological profiles of individuals. Each had different number of questions which were established according to the dimensions of the specific tests. The components of MMPI entailed close-ended questionnaires while HEXACO model and NEO tests included open-ended questions. HEXACO and NEO are more aligned as they feature components of five factor model. Differences exist in the subcategories that are developed for the tests and the inclusion of honesty-humility in HEXACO (Sellbom, 2019; De Vries et al, 2016)
Important aspect of the tests is that they are generally self administered even though professional administration is at times used. NEO and HEXACO both have self-reports and observer reports. There are significant similarities between these two tests. MMPI is applied in different forms which include MMPI-2 for adults and mmPI-2-RF. All of these tests have the complete version with all the necessary components and shorter versions with fewer questions and shorter period of completion. All the tests have been developed to adequately assess the mental state of people. Evaluation of the tests has show that they are very suitable in checking the psychological properties of people’s personality. NEO and HEXACO are defined by related user qualification levels given that they share some of the main parts of psychological testing. MMPI stands alone in terms of the process and elements of the implementation of the test (Maples-Keller et al 2019; De Vries et al, 2016)
The test of choice is HEXACO. This has advantages of being able to assess and predict some phenomena which are available in the big-five model. The addition of honesty-humility makes it more complete compared to the revised NEO tests. HEXACO tests are more prominent in their use therefore it presents the suitable focus for the project. The way that the test is used promotes evaluation of personality variables which other tools have failed to effectively do. The tests are an interesting assessment instrument to cover.
References
Big Five. (2019). BigFive personality test. Retrieved from https://bigfive-test.com/
Buros Center. (2019). The reviewed in the Mental Measurement Yearbook series. Retrieved from https://buros.org/tests-reviewed-mental-measurements-yearbook-series
De Vries, R. E., Tybur, J. M., Pollet, T. V., & van Vugt, M. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and human behavior, 37(5), 407-421.
HEXACO. (2019). The HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised. Retrieved fron http://hexaco.org/hexaco-online
Maples-Keller, J. L., Williamson, R. L., Sleep, C. E., Carter, N. T., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Using item response theory to develop a 60-item representation of the NEO PI–R using the international personality item pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60. Journal of personality assessment, 101(1), 4-15.
Mental Help. (2019). Psychology testing: Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhelp.net/psychological-testing/minnesota-multiphasic-personality-inventory/
MMPI. (2019). MMPI Practice test online. Retrieved from https://www.mmpionline.com/the-mmpi-questions/
Revolvy. (2019). Psychological testing. Retrieved from https://www.revolvy.com/folder/Psychological-testing/161434
Sellbom, M. (2019). The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Assessment of personality and psychopathology in the twenty-first century. Annual review of clinical psychology, 15, 149-177.
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!