Ethical Issues in Combating Domestic Terrorism
Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages Description/Paper Instructions
Ethical Issues in Combating Domestic Terrorism
Complete a 5–7 page research paper, excluding the title and reference pages. You can choose any aspect of domestic terrorism in America covered to date. However, you must choose a very specific issue that you will argue for or against (i.e. your thesis) as you comprehensively argue the key issues and their impact on American society (citizens, law enforcement, government officials, policies, etc.) Use examples to support your choice and position on the subject. You must cite and reference at least seven (7) scholarly sources within your paper.
My title for the research paper is “Ethical Issues in Combating Domestic Terrorism” I have included the Annotated Bibliography as well.
Abstract
With the ever changing use of technology by law enforcement, some of which are procured from the military, a growing debate over public policy and ethical values has emerged. Specifically regarding the use unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), commonly referred to as drones, to kill U.S. citizens targeted as terrorists. Although the proliferation of drones used for surveillance purposes continues to be a contentious issue throughout the United States, the specter of weaponized drones, as used by the military presents a new ethical debate concerning American’s civil liberties versus national security. (Greenwald, 2013)
Annotated Bibliography
Bjelopera, J. (2013). The Domestic Terrorist Threat: Background and Issues for Congress (CRS Report for Congress). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
The report explains the complexities and ambiguities that surround the process of dealing with domestic terrorists. Apparently, the American criminal justice system and national security agencies have no standard definition for domestic terrorism. This has previously led to domestic terrorists being prosecuted under other laws other those meant for terrorists. This lack of clarity provides room for the mistreatment of domestic terrorists or handling them with too much leniency. Consequently, it places the people mandated to drive counterterrorism efforts in an unnecessary dilemma. The report also gives a true picture of how damaging domestic terrorism can be to the country.
Brooks, R. A. (2011). Muslim “Homegrown” Terrorism in the United States: How Serious Is the Threat? International Security, 36(2), 7-47. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00055
This article takes an extensive look at the threat posed by Muslim Americans as potential domestic terrorists. Apparently, immediately after 9/11, no one considered them a threat. However, by the time Osama bin Laden was killed, this perception had changed. They were seen as a possible threat to national security. The change of perception came with a few changes including closer scrutiny, which essentially amounts to profiling. The message this article carries is that counteracting domestic terrorism without violating rights and liberties is a tough call. It brings out the dilemma that confronts law enforcers in dealing with domestic terrorism.
Field, A. (2016). Ethics and entrapment: Understanding counterterrorism stings. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-17. doi:10.1080/09546553.2016.1213721
This article focuses on sting operations usually conducted by security agencies against terrorists. These operations often entrap innocent people, leading to the loss of innocent lives. Critics consider this unethical, and recommend a change to this approach to counterterrorism or the use of other approaches. The key question is whether killing a few innocent people along with a dreaded terrorist or several terrorists is justifiable. From the perspective of security agencies, such collateral damage is permissible if the terrorist is considered very dangerous and difficult to locate. This ethical dilemma is one of the many that counterterrorism agencies deal with almost every time they carry out sting operations. Since sting operations are a counterterrorism strategy applicable to both international and domestic terrorism, this article bears relevance to the ethics of combating homegrown terrorism.
Gaines, L. K., & Miller, R. L. (2018). Criminal Justice in Action: The Core (9th Ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
This book serves a critical introductory role to the field of criminal justice. It uses the best tools and techniques available to make its message vivid and riveting. Its scope of coverage within the boundaries of criminal justice is extensive. It gives elaborate explanations on all the possible carrier paths available in the field of criminal justice. Additionally, it highlights the ethics surrounding each these career paths. For instance, a case in which an FBI agent is interrogating a domestic terrorist is highlighted to bring out the element of ethics in domestic counter-terrorism. It is a good resource because it brings the criminal justice system’s perspective and manner of handling domestic terrorism to the table and asks important questions in the process.
Jackson, B. A. (2009). The challenge of domestic intelligence in a free society: a multidisciplinary look at the creation of a U.S. domestic counterterrorism intelligence agency. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
This book focuses on the virtually everything to do with domestic terrorism. Its scope goes as far as the immediate post-WW II era, giving a solid history of this societal ill and America’s efforts to combat it. The book covers both domestic terrorism and counterterrorism extensively. This makes it one of the best resources available on America’s domestic terrorism and the government’s efforts to curb it. The ethical aspect of domestic counterterrorism has been explored adequately under the subject of security versus liberty. This makes the book an all-rounded resource for matters on domestic terrorism.
McCulloch, & Pickering, S. (2009). Pre-crime and counter-terrorism. British Journal of Criminology, 2009(49), 628-645. doi:doi:10.1093/bjc/azp023
The article is wary of a growing trend in the counterterrorism landscape. Apparently, there has been a paradigm shift from post-crime criminal justice processes to pre-crime counterterrorism, which in itself sounds prudent. However, there has been a blurring of the boundaries between criminal justice and national security, which is dangerous. The bundling together of the two, mostly driven by the desire to pre-empt terrorist attacks, seems to have given states the mandate to employ their coercive abilities both internally and externally. This shift is a source of concern because states tend to use too much force when pre-empting possible terrorist attacks, leading to a violation of people’s rights. The article’s primary concern is to demonstrate that although society is warming up to this approach, it is laced with unlawful activities that create an ethical dilemma.
Mullikin, A., & Rahman, S. S. (2010). The Ethical Dilemma Of The Usa Government Wiretapping. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 2(4), 32-39. doi:10.5121/ijmit.2010.2403
Wiretapping was introduced and accepted by Americans in the wake of the 9/11 attacks. Over the years, it has been bogged down by controversy over its ethical soundness and legality. Although it does not focus exclusively on domestic terrorism, wiretapping is a counterterrorism strategy used to combat both domestic and cross-border terrorism. The article thus explores one of the most emotive ethical issues surrounding counterterrorism, making a perfect resource for counterterrorism research.
References
Bjelopera, J. (2013). The Domestic Terrorist Threat: Background and Issues for Congress (CRS Report for Congress). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Brooks, R. A. (2011). Muslim “Homegrown” Terrorism in the United States: How Serious Is the Threat? International Security, 36(2), 7-47. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00055
Field, A. (2016). Ethics and entrapment: Understanding counterterrorism stings. Terrorism and Political Violence, 1-17. doi:10.1080/09546553.2016.1213721
Gaines, L. K., & Miller, R. L. (2018). Criminal Justice in Action: The Core (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Greenwald, G. (2013). Domestic drones and their unique dangers. The guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/mar/29/domestic-drones-unique-dangers
Jackson, B. A. (2009). The challenge of domestic intelligence in a free society: a multidisciplinary look at the creation of a U.S. domestic counterterrorism intelligence agency. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
McCulloch, %., & Pickering, S. (2009). PRE-CRIME AND COUNTER-TERRORISM. British Journal of Criminology, 2009(49), 628-645. doi:doi:10.1093/bjc/azp023
Mullikin, A., & Rahman, S. S. (2010). The Ethical Dilemma of The USA Government Wiretapping. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 2(4), 32-39. doi:10.5121/ijmit.2010.2403
RUBRIC
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper. GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
CLICK ON THE LINK HERE: https://www.perfectacademic.com/orders/ordernow
Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!